Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 39 · Page 1 of about 196 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 08 2019

Randhir Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-08-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

can be considered on merits by a tribunal, with the coming into force of the Armed Forces Tribunals Act, 2007.” 5 11 In a review petition5 filed by the Union of India, the earlier judgment was clarified on … & Ors Respondent(s) Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J JUDGMENT12 Admit. This appeal arises from a judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal at its Chandigarh Regional Bench dated 7 December 2015. The appellant was enrolled on 29 October 1996 in … the Court under Section 116 in respect of SCM. Further, under Rules 39 and 40 of the Rules, CO of the accused, or of the … law, it was urged that having due regard to the provisions of Section 120 of the Army Act 1950 and the decision of this Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2011

C. Rajan Vs. the Union of India, Rep by Its Secretary to Government an ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2011

Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Jul-12-2011

Subject : Service

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 05 2016

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Vishav Priya Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-05-2016

Subject : MRTP

weigh with the High Court of Delhi but that factor would stand modified with the enactment of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 which came into force on and with effect from 16.02.2008. He further submitted that Note 5 below Section … states that earlier two red ink entries had been made against the petitioner.(i) for absence without leave under Section 39(a) of the Army Act; and (ii) for committing act prejudicial to good order and military discipline (consuming liquor)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2011

S. Ramachander Vs. the Union of India, Represented by Chief of Army an ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Aug-10-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2014

Sher Amir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Decided on : Jan-09-2014

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2010

Nb Sub C.K.Yogesan Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

Decided on : Jul-08-2010

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been … who are to be treated as public servants; Section 38 provides protection of action taken in good faith. Section 39 provides that the Act in question has overriding effect; Section 40 deals with the power to remove difficulties;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2013

Shiv Karan Mishra, Naib Subedar Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Jun-28-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2012

Naib Subedar R.M. Bandyopadhyay Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2012

Subject : Education

was not promoted, he challenged the action of not promoting him by filing an O.A No.20/2010 before the Armed Forces Tribunal, Calcutta Bench seeking the grant of the promotion to the rank of Subedar with effect from 1st January, … proximity of Delhi. The petitioner at the material time in the year 2007 was, therefore, posted as Education JCO in Headquarter 9 Artillery Brigade, Meerut. … wrongly advised that the two days of unaccounted period could regularized after trial for absence without leave under Section 39 of the Army Act. In this regard, reliance was placed on the AEC Records Panchmarhi dated 28th March,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial