Advanced Search Results

Lt. Col. Pandappa Kotagi vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to:a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that Sections 14, 21, 30 and 33 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, insofar as they are interpreted or applied so as to exclude or substantially restrict the exercise of jurisdiction … 30 merely provides that, against a decision of the AFT, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court and Section 33 excludes the jurisdiction of civil courts in respect of service matters once the AFT had come into being.25.

Soudamini Vs. Kunhathi

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(3)KLT96

and other retirement benefits. S.14 of the Act deals with the authority and jurisdiction vested on the authority. Armed Forces Tribunal, that it alone is competent to decide any question relating to the service matter of a military personnel. … The Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition as per S.33, 34, 35 of Armed Force Tribunal Act, 2007. No interim relief is (sic) such relief can be granted. The suit is also dismissed. Hence no such … Navy Act, 1957 and Air Force Act, 1950 Sub-s. (2) of that section makes the Act applicable to the retired personnel governed by the aforesaid

Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal will have the jurisdiction to decide the matter relating to DGQA. Relying on Section 3(o)(iv) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the appellant submits that his case is squarely covered by the said provision. The appellant who is subject … Act, 2007.24. The appellant, who has appeared in-person has further relied on two provisions namely, Section 27 and Section 33 of the Army Act, 1950, which are extracted as below:- “27. Remedy of aggrieved officers.-- Any officer who

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

or Sub-section (2) of Section 31.Chapter VI of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 deals with miscellaneous matters. Section 33 deals with exclusion of jurisdiction of civil courts; Section 34 deals with transfer of pending cases. Section 35 … take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of Armed Forces Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the … appeal may be preferred by him to that Court under section 30 or sub-section (2) of section 31."11. Section 33 excludes the jurisdiction of Civil Courts. Section 34 deals with transfer of pending cases before any court including

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(xv) Section 24 of the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 (49 of 2005); (xvi) Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (55 of 2007); (xvii) Section 37 of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 (19 of … (C) No 1098 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No 1129 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No 33 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No 205 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No 467 of 2018

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

had put to challenge, by way of an Original Application, made under Sections 14 and 15 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, in the Regional Bench, Guwahati, the legality, validity and sustainability of the Court of Inquiry, the charge-sheet, which … by General Court Martial had already commenced and had made much progress. 33. Considering the fact that the impugned order, dated 20-11-2012, passed by the … details of the call records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an

Balwant Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Jagraj Singh (No. 14412115k) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against an order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. It is submitted that in view of Articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, Article 33 of the Constitution … view of Articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, Article 33 of the Constitution of India as well as Section 13 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007, this Court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

R. Magesh Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Its Secretary to the Government ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai