Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 29 · Page 1 of about 368 results (0.106 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2018

n.n. Godfred . Vs. Union of India and Ors.( for Respondent No. 2

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

OTHERS RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT INDU MALHOTRA, J.1. The present Civil Appeal has been filed under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 to challenge the judgment and order dated February 25, 2010 passed by the Principal Bench of the Armed … was submitted that Submarine Pay was a component of their “pay”, and not an “allowance”. 1.5 On March 29, 2005 Respondent No.3 rejected the representation stating that Submariners and Aviation Sailors were categorized under the group “Other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2026

Union of India vs Lt Col Mukul Dev

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

all powers of the High Courts of the country before transfer of proceedings to the Tribunal on the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 coming into force except for the powers under Article 226 W.P.(C) 12769/2024 Page 12 of 39and 227 of … considered relevant by the Larger Bench to the issue in question inclusive of the scope and ambit of Section 29 of the AFT Act, 2007 for effecting compliance/execution of the orders of this Tribunal”B. The Impugned Order6. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2013

Jugbir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-08-2013

Subject : Education

into account for his pensionary benefits.5. The petitioner filed an application dated 09.11.2010 under Section 29 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 seeking directions to the respondents to ensure time bound compliance of the order dated 17.11.2009.6. In the meantime,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been … to transfer cases from one Bench to another. Section 28 provides that the decision should by majority and Section 29 deals with execution of order of the Tribunal. Sections 21 and 22 of the Act being relevant are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2014

L/D Clerk Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Feb-13-2014

Subject : Education

case does not fall within the definition of 'Service Matters' as defined under Section 3 (o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 2007') as it the impugned order passed in summary Court … by the coordinate bench of this Court in SBCWP No.2215/2002-Ex-Sp. P.R. Yadav Vs. U.O.I. & Ors. decided on 29.11.2012, and in SBCWP No.436/2003- Ex. Havaldar Clerk Poonam Singh Chauhan Vs. U.O.I. & Ors., decided on 03.05.2013, transferring

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2014

Present : Mr.O.P.Gaba Advocate for the Petitioner. Vs. Gurmail Singh E ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-01-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal was whether the petitioner's OA was within the period of limitation prescribed under Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007?. The Tribunal proceeded on the premise that even if the limitation period were to be counted from the … by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Region Bench at Chandimandir, whereby his Original Application challenging the communication dated 29.07.2009 has been dismissed being barred by limitation. In order to appreciate the controversy, the facts may be noticed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

(xv) Section 24 of the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 (49 of 2005); (xvi) Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (55 of 2007); (xvii) Section 37 of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 (19 of … but I think this aspect of the article should be borne in mind.‖18 The amendment was however negatived. 29 Article 110 of the Constitution defines a Money Bill for the purposes of the Chapter. A Bill is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2013

Shrikant Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2013

Subject : Education

2011, he had filed a petition being O.A.No.81/2011 before the Armed Forces Tribunal under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 for quashing the order directing him to demit office in the afternoon of 23rd February, 2011 as he … 1975 batch as the only officer of the 1975 had retired in the rank of Colonel on the 29th of February 2008. For the reason that there was no officer for the 1975 batch, the Selection Board

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

had put to challenge, by way of an Original Application, made under Sections 14 and 15 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, in the Regional Bench, Guwahati, the legality, validity and sustainability of the Court of Inquiry, the charge-sheet, which … details of the call records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an … Air Force Station, was invited to Headquarters, Eastern Air Command, Shillong, on 29.06.2012, for a farewell dinner. The petitioner travelled by air from Dibrugarh to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2018

Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-18-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal will have the jurisdiction to decide the matter relating to DGQA. Relying on Section 3(o)(iv) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the appellant submits that his case is squarely covered by the said provision. The appellant who is subject … extensively quoted by this Court and after quoting Paragraph 26 of the judgment, following was stated in Para 29:- “29. Thus, the Court in G.S. Grewal case clearly held that merely because the respondent is subjected to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial