Advanced Search Results

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

had put to challenge, by way of an Original Application, made under Sections 14 and 15 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, in the Regional Bench, Guwahati, the legality, validity and sustainability of the Court of Inquiry, the charge-sheet, which … details of the call records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an … before us, as the petitioner in this writ petition, made under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is a decorated officer of

“having Heard the Learned Counsel for the Parties We Are of the Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

six months prior to the invocation of jurisdiction of the Tribunal in view of Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (for short ‘the Act’).which prescribes six months of limitation for invoking the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The petitioner

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been … procedure. Section 21; Section 21 specifically provides the application not to be admitted unless other remedies are exhausted. Section 22 deals with limitation for entertaining application. Section 23 deals with Procedure and powers of Tribunal. Section 24 deals

Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Service

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Union of India & Ors., S.L.P. (Civil) C.C. No.3709/2011 dated 07.03.2011 and on Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.11. The concept of pension has been explained time and again by the Supreme Court and we may again

Subedar Raj Bahadur Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Kamla Devi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Baldev Singh and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Era Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Ex-10329400-L Gdsm Sreenivasa Reddy vs Union of India

Court : Chennai

Application filed before theTribunal is not maintainable, due to the limitation period prescribed under Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. The petitioner was discharged from service on 31.07.2001, and his appeal was rejected on 13.10.2005. However, the Original