Advanced Search Results

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

had put to challenge, by way of an Original Application, made under Sections 14 and 15 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, in the Regional Bench, Guwahati, the legality, validity and sustainability of the Court of Inquiry, the charge-sheet, which … that ‘if the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant had sufficient cause for not making the application under Section 21 of the AFT Act, the Tribunal shall not admit such an application. Similarly, Section 32 confers power to

Col Sunil Dhir Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

Lt. Col. Pandappa Kotagi vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to:a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that Sections 14, 21, 30 and 33 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, insofar as they are interpreted or applied so as to exclude or substantially restrict the exercise of jurisdiction … challenge to Sections 21, 30 and 33 of the AFT Act. Signature Not Verified Page 10 of 1221. Section 21 only requires an applicant, who approaches theTribunal, to do so after exhausting other remedies available to him. This

Jagraj Singh (No. 14412115k) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against an order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. It is submitted that in view of Articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, Article 33 of the Constitution … view of Articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, Article 33 of the Constitution of India as well as Section 13 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007, this Court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. … service he was inflicted with five red ink entries dated 25.10.1997, 09.8.2000, 21.12.2000, 12.7.2001 and 26.9.2001; besides, one black ink entry dated 10.09.2007. A show

Malati Sardar Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

subject matter of dispute was not covered by the definition of “service matters” under Section 3(o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 and on that ground, it was held that the Armed Forces Tribunal had no jurisdiction in the matter. … the civil court. The Tribunal could follow the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). Having regard to Section 21 CPC, objection of lack of territorial jurisdiction could not be entertained in absence of any prejudice. Distinction was

Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

entertaining and deciding the application filed under Section 19 of the Act in complete disregard and mandate of Section 21 of the Act dealing with limitation.16. In the facts of the present case, the learned Armed Forces Tribunal … v. Union of India & Ors., S.L.P. (Civil) C.C. No.3709/2011 dated 07.03.2011 and on Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.11. The concept of pension has been explained time and again by the Supreme Court and we may again

Ex-10329400-L Gdsm Sreenivasa Reddy vs Union of India

Court : Chennai

Application filed before theTribunal is not maintainable, due to the limitation period prescribed under Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. The petitioner was discharged from service on 31.07.2001, and his appeal was rejected on 13.10.2005. However, the Original … 2025:MHC:612IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Ex-10329400-l Gdsm Sreenivasa Reddy S/o Venkata Reddy, Aged

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

business of the Tribunal among its Benches.Chapter IV of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 deals with procedure. Section 21; Section 21 specifically provides the application not to be admitted unless other remedies are exhausted. Section 22 deals … take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been

3398223 M Sep Jagjit Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Era Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi