Advanced Search Results

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been … authority in service matters. Section 15 deals with jurisdiction, powers and authority in matters of appeal against court-martial. Section 16 deals with re-trial. Section 17 deals with powers of Tribunal on appeal under Section 15. Section 18 deals

Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Service

Matched in: Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Balkrishna Ram Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

heard by the High Court. 2 3. The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT for short) was constituted under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), enacted with the purpose of constituting an AFT to adjudicate disputes and … the Armed Forces. Chapter III of the Act, deals with the jurisdiction, power and authority of the Tribunal. Section 14(1) of the Act which is relevant reads as follows:­ “14. Jurisdiction, powers and authority in service matters. … large majority of cases involve an interpretation of Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution. To hold that the Tribunals have no power to

Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Union of India & Ors., S.L.P. (Civil) C.C. No.3709/2011 dated 07.03.2011 and on Section 22 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.11. The concept of pension has been explained time and again by the Supreme Court and we may again

Ashit Kumar Mishra vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and issues raised by the petitioners is a ‘service matter' as defined in Section 3 (o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (Act). The petitioners have an alternative remedy as per the Act and should move the Armed Forces Tribunal … which distinguish resignation and voluntary retirement, albeit in Shahsikala Devi versus Central Bank of India & Ors., (2013) 16 SCC260 it has been observed that the expression retirement could be read to mean termination of service by

Depinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

of 2013 - 2- ordered by the learned Tribunal in view of provisions of Section 16 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. The order of the learned Tribunal has been assailed to the limited extent that re-trial of the petitioner

Chittur Vettaikkorumakan Kavu Kshethra Committee vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … Senior Government Pleader and the learned Standing Counsel for Cochin Devaswom Board would point out the provisions under Section 16 of Kerala Land Conservancy Act, 1957, whereby an order in the nature of Ext.P17 is appealable before the

Geethakumari vs 1. Kuttumukku Devaswom Represented by the Devaswom Off ...

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … one passed in Ext.P8 appeal, i.e., Appeal No.11698 of 2019, which was one filed by the petitioner under Section 16(1)(b) of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act, challenging Ext.P1 order dated 06.06.2019 of the 4th respondent Special Tahsildar.6. Section

Davis vs Kuttumukku Devaswom

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … one passed in Ext.P12 appeal, i.e., Appeal No.11272 of 2019, which was one filed by the petitioner under Section 16(1)(b) of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act, challenging Ext.P1 order dated 06.06.2019 of the 4th respondent Special Tahsildar.6. Section

Prakasan vs Kuttumukku Devaswom

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … one passed in Ext.P8 appeal, i.e., Appeal No.11273 of 2019, which was one filed by the petitioner under Section 16(1)(b) of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act, challenging Ext.P1 order dated 06.06.2019 of the 4th respondent Special Tahsildar.6. Section