Advanced Search Results

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been … and other members. Section 8 deals with term of the office. Section 9 deals with resignation and removal; Section 10 deals with salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Chairperson and other members. Section 11

Jagraj Singh (No. 14412115k) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against an order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. It is submitted that in view of Articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, Article 33 of the Constitution … contemplated an opportunity to show cause against the contemplated discharge. Paragraph 567 of the Artillery Records Instructions 2000 (Section 10) under the heading ‘Discharge, Retirement and Dismissal may also be noticed. The same read as under:- ARTILLERY RECORDS

Randhir Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

can be considered on merits by a tribunal, with the coming into force of the Armed Forces Tribunals Act, 2007.” 5 11 In a review petition5 filed by the Union of India, the earlier judgment was clarified on … & Ors Respondent(s) Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J JUDGMENT12 Admit. This appeal arises from a judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal at its Chandigarh Regional Bench dated 7 December 2015. The appellant was enrolled on 29 October 1996 in … and upwards, and three months if such officer is below that rank.” 10 These provisions were interpreted in the decision in Ex-Havildar Ratan Singh (supra). … law, it was urged that having due regard to the provisions of Section 120 of the Army Act 1950 and the decision of this Court

Hindhu Aikya Vedi, Chittur Taluk Vs THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … Gordon Grant and Co. [1935 AC 532] and Secretary of State v. Mask and Co. [AIR 1940 PC 105]. It has also been held to be equally applicable to enforcement of rights and has been followed by

Davis vs Kuttumukku Devaswom

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … No.A3/11272/2019, before the 3rdrespondent Sub Collector, which was dismissed by Ext.P14 orderdated 17.08.2020. Hence this writ petition.3. On 10.11.2020, when this writ petition came up foradmission, this Court admitted the matter on file. The learned Standing Counsel

Sh. Raj Kumar M.E.-i Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Armed Forces Tribunal Act which came into force, the writ petition was transferred under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 to its Principal Bench and it was registered in the Armed Force Tribunal as T.A.No.252/2009, titled as „Raj … and circumstances. 2. Brief relevant facts to comprehend the controversies are that the petitioner joined the Navy on 10th July, 1981 as a Metric Entry Recruit (MER). He was posted on various ships on various dates. For

Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal will have the jurisdiction to decide the matter relating to DGQA. Relying on Section 3(o)(iv) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the appellant submits that his case is squarely covered by the said provision. The appellant who is subject … where the punishment of dismissal is awarded; (iv)any other matter, whatsoever, but shall not include matters relating to- 10 (i)orders issued under section 18 of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) sub- section (1) of section

Ashit Kumar Mishra vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and issues raised by the petitioners is a ‘service matter' as defined in Section 3 (o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (Act). The petitioners have an alternative remedy as per the Act and should move the Armed Forces Tribunal … of the High Court under article 226 and this Court under Article 32 WP(C).No.7219/2016 & connected matters Page 10 of 13 though cannot be circumscribed by the provisions of any enactment, they will certainly have due regard

Prakasan vs Kuttumukku Devaswom

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … Pattayam/Purchase Certificate; and a writ, order or direction to stay all further proceedings of eviction and recovery of 10 cents of land/property comprised in Survey No.211/2 of Vilvattom Village from the possession of the petitioner, in obedience

Malati Sardar Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

subject matter of dispute was not covered by the definition of “service matters” under Section 3(o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 and on that ground, it was held that the Armed Forces Tribunal had no jurisdiction in the matter. … R. DAVE ]. …………..….………………………………..J.[ ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ]. NEW DELHI JANUARY5 2016 ----------------------- [1]. (2014) 7 SCC303[2]. (2013) 10 SCC136[3]. (2009) 2 SCC244[4]. AIR1954SC34