Advanced Search Results

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors. Vs. Ram Kumar Bhardwaj and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 2(25)

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT283

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) The respondents are registered as architects under the Architects Act, 1972 and practice assuch in the Union Territory of Delhi. They filed two writ petitionschallenging the power of the … We have, thereforee, to see for such provisions in thebye-laws. Bye-laws 6, 9 and 10(2) of the Building Bye-laws. 1959refer to the licensed architects as … licensed under theprovisions of this Act as an architect, draughtsman,engineer, plumber, surveyor and town planner'.Since the definition of section 2(25) contemplates that a licensedarchitect or a licensed draughtsman is to be a person who is licensedunder the

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … has challenged the order of the Council of Architecture passed on October 9, 1979, refusing the registration to the petitioner as an Architect, under Section … S.B. Wad, J. (1) In this petition, under Section 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the order of the Council of Architecture passed on October

Indian Institute of Architects Vs. A.P. Health and Medical Housing and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 37

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD20

arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as well as the provisions of the Architects Act, 1972 ('the Act'). 2. The first respondent is a Government of Andhra Pradesh Enterprise engaged in the development of … State Board. The School Tribunal constituted under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Act cannot entertain appeals filed under Section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established and administered by the Cantonment Board. Teacher employed in

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … Attempt of JEE (Main), 2019 Paper-2 were declared on 31.1.2019, wherein the percentile score of the appellant was 99.2676875 and the results of the Second Attempt of the JEE (Main) Paper-2 were declared on 14.5.2019, wherein his

Utpal Bose and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 414, 414(3) and 599;; Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1977 - Section 378;; Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 23, 25, 27, 29, 44, 44(2), 47 and 123;; Constitution of India - Article 246;; Bidhan Nagar Building Rules - Rule 50;; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 502

Reported in : AIR1991Cal48

was an upsurge of under-qualified persons describing themselves as architects and resulting in unsafe work of construction. The Architects Act, 1972 was engrafted in the Statute Book to provide for the registration of architects so as to eradicate the … so as to eradicate the unqualified and under-qualified persons taking upon the responsibility in that regard as architects.2. Section 25 of the Act of 1972 provides that a person shall be entitled, on payment of a fee … made applicable in the absence of any written contract to the contrary'. 9. Incidentally it is to be noted at this juncture that the Calcutta

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope

Premendra Raj Mehta and ors Vs. National Building Construction Corp. L ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Sharma, Advs for Council of Architecture CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Section 37(1) of the Architects Act, 1972 reads as under:37. Prohibition against use of title. (1) After the expiry of one year from the date

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Versus NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION & ORS. + W.P.(C) 9702/2016, CM APPL. No.38834/2016 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHETECTS Versus .....Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS .....Petitioner

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Versus NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION & ORS. + W.P.(C) 9702/2016, CM APPL. No.38834/2016 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHETECTS Versus .....Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS .....Petitioner

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … of clearing the academic examination in its entirety in the same year. 9. There cannot be any dispute about the proposition that the Regulations made