Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: architects act 1972 section 6 · Page 1 of about 385 results (0.066 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 2013

Premendra Raj Mehta and ors Vs. National Building Construction Corp. L ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

Sharma, Advs for Council of Architecture CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Section 37(1) of the Architects Act, 1972 reads as under:37. Prohibition against use of title. (1) After the expiry of one year from the date … the order of the Supreme Court in Sai Chalchitra Vs. Commissioner, Meerut Mandal & Ors. (2005) 3 SCC 683.In the said case the grievance of the petitioner before the High Court was against grant of license to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2009

Ar. Vijay Garg and Vs. Ar. P. Satheeshkumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-2009

Subject : Election

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 3(3), 5, 5(2), 6(2) and 6(3); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR2009Mad135

the election to fill up the five vacancies in the second respondent Council under Section 3(3)(a) of the Architects Act, 1972 among the Members of the Indian Institute of Architects, Chennai.3. In their writ petitions, the writ petitioners have … date specified in the notice.(2) In the case of a vacancy under Sub-section (2) or Sub-section (3) of Section 6 or any other vacancy, the President shall notify the Central Government as soon as possible the occurrence of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1980

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors. Vs. Ram Kumar Bhardwaj and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-02-1980

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 2(25)

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT283

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) The respondents are registered as architects under the Architects Act, 1972 and practice assuch in the Union Territory of Delhi. They filed two writ petitionschallenging the power of the … architects. We have, thereforee, to see for such provisions in thebye-laws. Bye-laws 6, 9 and 10(2) of the Building Bye-laws. 1959refer to the licensed architects … licensed under theprovisions of this Act as an architect, draughtsman,engineer, plumber, surveyor and town planner'.Since the definition of section 2(25) contemplates that a licensedarchitect or a licensed draughtsman is to be a person who is licensedunder the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 16 2017

The Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction C ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-2017

Subject : Education

for engaging the services of foreign architects is in contravention of the provisions of Section 37(1) of the Architects Act, 1972. The petitioner, therefore, seeks a direction to the respondent No.4 to establish an institutionalized system and lay down … Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860 as a voluntary organization of Architects to W.P.(C) 4111/2017 Page 1 of 6 encourage study of Architecture and to elevate the standard of architectural practice as well as to promote the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2000

Akshaya JaIn Vs. Airports Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-10-2000

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1086; 2000(3)ARBLR563(Delhi); 87(2000)DLT330; 2000(55)DRJ183; 2000(3)RAJ256

was also informed by the petitioner that the Council of Architecture which is a statutory body under the Architects Act, 1972 was involved in selecting the best design in the competition for the project of Civil Aviation Training Centre. … ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an arbitration petition, on behalf of the petitioner, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') seeking the appointment of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2005

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope … of recruitment was altered as follows : '40% by direct recruitment and 60% by promotion' and the promotion was from the posts of Draughtsman/Architect Officers.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2015

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2015

Subject : Education

rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2001

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-22-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]116TAXMAN418(Bom)

under article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners who are Associations of tax practitioners, Chartered Accountants and architects challenge the constitutional validity of section 116 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998. The Act envisages service … persons providing service are liable to recover tax and pay the same to the Central Government under section 68 of the Act. The service tax was introduced by the Finance Act, 1994. The ambit of the Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2011

All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Council of Architecture ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-2011

Subject : Education

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Section 3(3)(b); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2(g), 10; Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Section 35

1. A short but interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of Section 3 (3) (b) of the Architects Act, 1972 (AA) arises for consideration in this writ petition. 2. The Petitioner, All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), … the present writ petition. This application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti to both the parties." 6. It is submitted by Mr. Jatan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the AICTE that the stand taken by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2015

Balbir Verma Vs. The Indian Institute of Architects and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-2015

Subject : Election

office of an elected member of the Council of Architecture (the Council), as per Section 6(1) of The Architects Act, 1972 (the Act) is of three years from the date of his election or until his successor has been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial