Advanced Search Results

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 30, 30(1), 35 and 45; Architects Act (Professional Misconduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulations 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 78; Right to Information Act (RTI); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rule 35(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

as the Conduct Regulations. These have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972. Nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the notice for hearing have respondent

Kum. Khayti Girish Purnima Kulkarni Vs. College of Architecture and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Regulation 4 of the Minimum Standard of Architecture Education Regulation, 1983 as ultra vires Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972 (for short, `the Act of 1972') and to quash and set aside the same. 3. Briefly stated, the

Council Of Architecture Vs. The Academic Society Of Architects (tasa)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Regulations was that the Regulations required the prior approval of the Central Government under Section 45 of The Architects Act, 1972, (in short referred to as ‘the Act’) before they are implemented and that no such prior approval was

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency (Nta) Department of High Ed ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

1972) F. No.CA/12/2019/Regulations.-In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (e), (g), (h), and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section 45 read with Section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972 (20 of 1972), the Council of Architecture, with the … to the effect: NOTIFICATION "COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE New Delhi, The 12th February, 2019 (STATUTORY AUTHORITY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972) F. No.CA/12/2019/Regulations.-In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (e), (g), (h), and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … shall be promoted to higher class only if he has scored minimum 45% marks in each theory head and 50% marks in each sessional /

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … buildings as long as he does not style himself as an architect.” 45. Even though both Mr. Bhagat and Mr. Nath have strenuously contended that … rendered by those to whom the Act applies. He submits that the expression „architect‟ has been defined under Section 2(a) of the Act to mean a person whose name is for the time being entered into the

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … unless he has the requisite qualifications and experience and is registered under the Act.11. Coming to the Regulations, Section 45 of the Act empowers the Council, with the approval of the Central Government, to make regulations to carry

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … unless he has the requisite qualifications and experience and is registered under the Act.11. Coming to the Regulations, Section 45 of the Act empowers the Council, with the approval of the Central Government, to make regulations to carry

Silicon Graphics Systems (India) P. Ltd. Vs. Sterling and Wilson Elect ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

of limitation during which a claim could be raised to be hit by Section 28 of the Contract Act, 1972. He accordingly submitted that the minority Award holding that the claim was barred by limitation was contrary to … clearly the relief sought. All the necessary information was available in Exhibit 45. The facts were set out in the chronology of events but could … in terms of Clause 98.1 of the contract, the Respondent was bound to inform the Petitioner or their Architect within 28 days, i.e., within 6th April 1999 in the case of the DG sets contract and within