Advanced Search Results

Meghana A.P. Desai (Smt.) and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 - Sections 44 and 140; Goa, Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning (Planning and Development Authorities) Rules, 1977 - Rule 13

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR377

clearly flows from the Statement of Objects and Reasons for the Bill submitted for the passing of the Architects Act, 1972, that Engineers are not forbidden from designing plans for buildings and that the design, supervision and construction of … and elaborating the above grounds, Mr. M.S. Usgaonkar, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, first contented that section 44 of the aforesaid Act does not permit the Government to frame rules as a result of which the

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated

Utpal Bose and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 414, 414(3) and 599;; Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1977 - Section 378;; Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 23, 25, 27, 29, 44, 44(2), 47 and 123;; Constitution of India - Article 246;; Bidhan Nagar Building Rules - Rule 50;; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 502

Reported in : AIR1991Cal48

was an upsurge of under-qualified persons describing themselves as architects and resulting in unsafe work of construction. The Architects Act, 1972 was engrafted in the Statute Book to provide for the registration of architects so as to eradicate the … so as to eradicate the unqualified and under-qualified persons taking upon the responsibility in that regard as architects.2. Section 25 of the Act of 1972 provides that a person shall be entitled, on payment of a fee … Book under S. 27 of the Act and in terms of S. 44 the Central Government has been authorised to make rules for all or

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

Service 65(5). architect means any person whose name is, for the time being, entered in the register of architects maintained under section 23 of the Architects Act,1972 (20 of 1972) and also includes any commercial concern engaged … business" has the meaning assigned to it in clause (g) of section 3 of General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 (57 of 1972); Taxable Service 65(16)(c) to a policy holder, by an insurer carrying on general insurance business,

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration”

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration”

Bank of Baroda vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration”

The Karnataka Bank Ltd vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration”

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … that provides for “Provisional Offer of Seat and its Confirmation” prescribes the following conditions in paras 42 and 44:-"“XVII PROVISIONAL OFFER OF SEAT AND ITS CONFIRMATION42 A candidate who has been allocated a seat is allowed to

G. Sathyavelu Vs. G. Pramila Devi and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

determined by the court. This provision is only an extension of the privilege given to such shareholders by section 44, paragraph 2 of the Transfer of Property Act, and is an application of a well-known rule which obtains … feasibility of partition of the suit property in terms of the decree passed in O.S.6933/08. Mr. Dyappa, an architect, was appointed as commissioner by the court. He has submitted a report stating that it is not feasible