Advanced Search Results
Sikand Construction Co. Vs. State Bank of India
Delhi
Oct-27-1978
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20
ILR1979Delhi364
architects referred to in the contract is a partnership firm it is deemed to have been dissolved under Section 42 of the Partnership Act on the death of one of the partners. It is admitted that Mr. Sathe … The respondent bank made payment of Rs. 48,355.29 p. as per its letter No. 583, dated 11th July, 1972 to the petitioner who is alleged to have accepted the same under protest. On 12th March, 1973, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency (Nta) Department of High Ed ...
Delhi
Aug-19-2019
Right to Information
to the effect: NOTIFICATION "COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE New Delhi, The 12th February, 2019 (STATUTORY AUTHORITY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972) F. No.CA/12/2019/Regulations.-In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (e), (g), (h), and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section … respondent No.1 i.e., the National Testing Agency published its Information Bulletin for the W.P.(C) No.8307/2019 Page 1 of 42 First Attempt of the JEE (Main) on 1.9.2018 and clause 3.1. thereof spelt out the eligibility for admission
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhakar Balkrishna Vernekar and Another Vs. Madhav V. Joshi and Othe ...
Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panaji
Mar-27-2014
Arbitration
compensation for deficiency of service by the carrier, in view of the provisions of the Carriage by Air Act, 1972 read with the Warsaw Convention, as the National Commission could be considered a Court within the territory of … and/or interpretation of the same, the dispute shall be referred to the architect of the project appointed by the vendor/builder and such architect would function … 52(V)(v) of Accounts Officer, Jharkhand, supra. Therefore, the complainant having approached the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum established under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003, is now precluded from coming back to the Fora under the C.P. Act,1986.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...
Delhi
Oct-31-2019
Education
examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … Business Rules that provides for “Provisional Offer of Seat and its Confirmation” prescribes the following conditions in paras 42 and 44:-"“XVII PROVISIONAL OFFER OF SEAT AND ITS CONFIRMATION42 A candidate who has been allocated a seat is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChief Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax Vs. M/s Safari Ret ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2024
Service Tax
from any of the following, namely:- (i) an architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or (ii) a chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or (iii) a licensed surveyor of … or services or both made Civil Appeal No.2948 of 2023 etc. Page 42 of 91 during the financial year 2017-18, the details of which have … issues which broadly arise in this group of matters concern clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of Civil Appeal No.2948 of 2023 etc. Page 1 of 91 the Central Goods and Services Tax
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahipal Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-05-2016
Land Acquisition
action and punishes the concerned advocate if he is guilty of any misconduct etc. Reference was made to Architects Act, 1972, Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, Company Secretaries Act, 1980, Pharmacy Practice Regulations, 2015, Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct Etiquettes … in this judgment, and to draw proceedings against him for professional misconduct. 42. Under the Rules of this Court, the contemnor shall not be permitted … ….Appellant VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh ....Respondent JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the judgment and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Consolidated Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Glaxo Laboratories (India) ...
Mumbai
Mar-25-1976
Arbitration
(1976)78BOMLR441
and godowns at their factory premises at Thana. The defendants appointed Messrs. Pheroze Kudianavala and Associates as their architects. The R.C.C. Designs for the said work was prepared by Mr. Kuton J. Dubash of DUBON Engineering Company, … of water during the monsoon; and by their letter dated March 7, 1972, the plaintiffs wrote to Mr. Pheroze Kudianavala:This is to remind you to … others, Clause 23, relating to removal of improper work and materials; Clause 42, relating to the matters to be finally determined by the architect, and … New Consolidated Construction Company Limited, filed on November 6, 1973, a petition tinder Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, praying: (a) that it may be declared that there was an arbitration agreement between them and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-24-1973
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(1)(f), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 19(6), 20, 20(2), 21, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3), 22(4), 23, 24, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 26, 26, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 31, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31(2A), 31(2B), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(5), 31(6), 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31B, 31C, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(4), 33, 34, 35, 35, 37, 38, 39, 39(B), 39, 39, 39(C), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46(1), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 56(1), 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 62, 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 73, 73(1), 73(2), 74, 75, 75(1), 75(4), 76, 76(2), 77(2), 79, 83, 83(2), 85, 85(1), 88, 89, 100, 102(1), 103(1), 103(3)
AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1
of Article 31(C) cannot be sustained.644. The last matter for determination is the validity of the 29th Amendment Act, 1972. The challenge is only against the inclusion of two Acts, namely, the Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act 1969 … Initiative and Referendum Act [1919] A.C. 935 the position briefly was that the British North America Act 1867, Section 92, head I, which empowered a Provincial Legislature to amend the Constitution of the Province, "excepting as regards … observed by Holmes J. in Towne v. Eiser. 215 U.S. 418 at 425 "A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged; it is the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Apr-09-2014
Service Tax
whose name is, for the time being, entered in the register of architects maintained under section 23 of the Architects Act,1972 (20 of 1972) and … business" has the meaning assigned to it in clause (g) of section 3 of General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 (57 of 1972); Taxable Service 65(16)(c) to a policy holder, by an insurer carrying on general insurance business, … under Section 32(1) of the Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981. It is his submission that the provisions of Section 42 of the Major Port Trust Act cannot be equated to the provisions of the Section 32 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAurobindo Pharma Limited Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-04-1998
Property
Andhra Pradesh Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 59(1); Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Zoning Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 12; Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Multi-storied Buildings Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 19; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 428, 429, 452, 453, 454, 456, 461, 462, 463, 586, 589, 596, 675, 676, 676-E, 677, 678, 679 and 679(1 and E); Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Buildings Rules, - Rules 3 and 18; Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, 1979 - Sections 3; Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 3, 208, 229 and 230; Andhra Pradesh Town Planning Act, 1920 - S
1998(5)ALD647; 1998(5)ALT580
by the Government was extensively published and discussed at various Fora, meetings were held with all groups like Architects, Builders Fora, Floor Leaders, Elected Representatives etc. The draft policy was also placed on the Floor of the … may consider necessary for carrying out the purposes of this Act.' 2. The Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Buildings) Bye-Laws, 1972 Section 80 which deals with the power of Government to exempt Buildings, reads as under: 'The Government either suo-motu … building regulations and notices regarding erection of buildings, while referring to Section 428 which deals with the notice to be given to Commissioner, of intention
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »