Advanced Search Results

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 30, 30(1), 35 and 45; Architects Act (Professional Misconduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulations 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 78; Right to Information Act (RTI); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rule 35(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

as the Conduct Regulations. These have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972. Nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the notice for hearing have respondent … No. 2 forwarded the complaint to the petitioner for filing the statement of defence in the matter within 40 days. The petitioner filed his reply on 21st November, 2007, denying all the allegations. It was further pointed

Ar. Vijay Garg and Vs. Ar. P. Satheeshkumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Election

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 3(3), 5, 5(2), 6(2) and 6(3); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR2009Mad135

the election to fill up the five vacancies in the second respondent Council under Section 3(3)(a) of the Architects Act, 1972 among the Members of the Indian Institute of Architects, Chennai.3. In their writ petitions, the writ petitioners have … are also the members of the Indian Institute of Architects. Pursuant to the notice issued by the respondents 4 and 5/who are the appellants herein, the writ petitioners have filed their nominations for the posts of Members

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … application of mind such decisions must be assumed to be reasoned orders.; 4. The petitioner himself suppressed the fact that he was working as a … S.B. Wad, J. (1) In this petition, under Section 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the order of the Council of Architecture passed on October

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … of the Act as a person whose W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 4 of 11 name is entered in the register maintained under Section 23

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … of the Act as a person whose W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 4 of 11 name is entered in the register maintained under Section 23

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated

All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Council of Architecture ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Section 3(3)(b); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2(g), 10; Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Section 35

1. A short but interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of Section 3 (3) (b) of the Architects Act, 1972 (AA) arises for consideration in this writ petition. 2. The Petitioner, All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), … to the COA to accept the nominations made by the AICTE by its letter dated 11th October 2006. 4. On 27th June 2007 while directing notice to issue in this petition this Court passed the following interim

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … standard 10+2 CBSE examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting

S. Borappa and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, Urba ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 25 and 37; Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 3(L)

Reported in : ILR2003KAR5127; 2004(2)KarLJ425

of Section 3, which states that: 'A person having experience in Architecture', Further he placed reliance on the Architects Act, 1972. The 'Architect' is defined under sub-section (a) of Section 2 as: 'Architect' means a person whose name is