Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: architects act 1972 section 39 · Page 1 of about 94 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 27 2003

Rajashree Bokade and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-27-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 3 and 23(3); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10; Nagpur University Act, 1974 - Sections 39 and 40; Minimum Standard of Architectural Education Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj571

regulations committed by them. Noorder as to costs. Constitution - renewal - Sections 3 and 23 (3) of Architects Act, 1972, Section 10 of All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, Sections 39 and 40 of Nagpur University Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1992

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Mahesh Vadilal Gandhi and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-24-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 18, 23(1A) and 23(2); Bombay Building Repair and Reconstruction Board Act, 1969 - Sections 40(3)

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR419

1171/(2).77417(a)--H.R.C. dated 4th September 1972. In exercise of the powers conferred on the Government under sub-section (3) of section 39 of the said Act, the Government of Maharashtra, sanctioned draft scheme submitted by the Board in respect of … sale Deeds marked as Exhibit C-1 to C-3 and S-1 to S-4. M/s. Sykes Patkar and Divecha, wellknown Architects of city of Bombay submitted their report dated 1st September 1973 (exhibit 'C-4') on behalf of claimants in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1976

New Consolidated Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Glaxo Laboratories (India) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-1976

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR441

and godowns at their factory premises at Thana. The defendants appointed Messrs. Pheroze Kudianavala and Associates as their architects. The R.C.C. Designs for the said work was prepared by Mr. Kuton J. Dubash of DUBON Engineering Company, … of water during the monsoon; and by their letter dated March 7, 1972, the plaintiffs wrote to Mr. Pheroze Kudianavala:This is to remind you to … Clauses 2, 7, 9, 17, 23, 30(a), (b), (c), (d), (f) and 39 hereof and as to the exercise by him under Clause 12 of … New Consolidated Construction Company Limited, filed on November 6, 1973, a petition tinder Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, praying: (a) that it may be declared that there was an arbitration agreement between them and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 2018

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2018

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … rendered by those to whom the Act applies. He submits that the expression „architect‟ has been defined under Section 2(a) of the Act to mean a person whose name is for the time being entered into the … & Ms. Rupam Sharma, Advs. for Intervener in C.M. No.14122/2013. + W.P.(C) 3975/2012 & C.M. Nos.4055/2013 & 15336/2017 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR ........ Petitioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2026

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-01-2026

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” … following judgments:-(i) Commissioner vs. Larsen and Toubro Limited - 2016 (44) STR 391 (Guj); - 11 -(ii) Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2026

Bank of Baroda vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-01-2026

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” … following judgments:-(i) Commissioner vs. Larsen and Toubro Limited - 2016 (44) STR 391 (Guj); - 11 -(ii) Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2026

The Karnataka Bank Ltd vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-01-2026

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” … following judgments:-(i) Commissioner vs. Larsen and Toubro Limited - 2016 (44) STR 391 (Guj); - 11 -(ii) Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2026

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-01-2026

such authority, from any of the following, namely:--(A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or(B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(C) licensed surveyor of the respective local body … The respondents issued the impugned show cause notices interalia contending that by virtue of the provisions contained in Sections 66B, 65B(44) and (51), 66E(e) and Section 67 of the Finance Act, 2012 and the definition of “consideration” … following judgments:-(i) Commissioner vs. Larsen and Toubro Limited - 2016 (44) STR 391 (Guj); - 11 -(ii) Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Bhayana Builders (P)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2024

M/S Rohan Corporation India Pvt Ltd vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-10-2024

authority, from any of the following, namely:-(i) an architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972;or(ii) a chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or(iii) a licensed surveyor of the respective local … that not only the physical property but also the rights and - 39 - benefits arising out of such property are recognised as immovable property. … of the petitioner together with interest. Learned Senior Counsel would elaborate his submissions as hereunder:(i) In terms of Section 9(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, GSTis attracted on supply of goods or services or both and viewed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

A.Dharmakeerthi vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

FLOOR AND REPLACEMENT WITH FLOOR SLAB BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED ANNEXURE-D TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE CONDITION OF ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE, NEW DELHI SPECIFYING ARCHITECTS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ND EXCEPTS ANNEXURE E TRUE COPY … issued by the Corporation. CWs3 to 10, 12, 13, 33 to 37, 39 to 43 and 45 and 54 are the official witnesses of the … 7th accused in C.C.No.3 of 2020 arising from Crime No.3/2009/SIU-1 of VACB, SIU-I, Thiruvananthapuram for offences punishable under section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) and section 120B of the PC Act, 1988.2. The crux of the prosecution allegation is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial