Advanced Search Results

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … using any name, style or title containing the word “architect”, and Clause 38 of the same prohibited unregistered persons from practicing the profession of architecture. … rendered by those to whom the Act applies. He submits that the expression „architect‟ has been defined under Section 2(a) of the Act to mean a person whose name is for the time being entered into the

Mahipal Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

action and punishes the concerned advocate if he is guilty of any misconduct etc. Reference was made to Architects Act, 1972, Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, Company Secretaries Act, 1980, Pharmacy Practice Regulations, 2015, Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct Etiquettes … of contempt, if the Bar Council fails to take action, this Court could invoke its appellate power under Section 38 of the Advocates Act[7].. In a given case, this court or the High Court can prevent the contemnor

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Mahesh Vadilal Gandhi and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 18, 23(1A) and 23(2); Bombay Building Repair and Reconstruction Board Act, 1969 - Sections 40(3)

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR419

sale Deeds marked as Exhibit C-1 to C-3 and S-1 to S-4. M/s. Sykes Patkar and Divecha, wellknown Architects of city of Bombay submitted their report dated 1st September 1973 (exhibit 'C-4') on behalf of claimants in … the Board, the Government and the Collector of Bombay since about January 1972. Proceedings for acquisition of plots and buildings in whatever condition concerning L.A.R. … said plots of land with the buildings in whatever condition they existed as contemplated under sub-section (3) of section 38 of the Bombay Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board Act, 1969. The Government of Maharashtra provisionally approved the draft

Dharmarth Trust Jandk Jammu and ors.Vs. Dinesh Chander NandA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order VI Rule 17

is, for the time being, entered in the register of architects maintained under section 23 of the Architect Act, 1972 and also includes any person engaged in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, in rendering services in the … services. (c) On 16.10.1996, the Respondent served a legal notice to the Trust claiming compensation amounting to Rs. 38,77,263.75 towards professional charges including interest thereon for various projects. After not getting any reply from the Trust, after

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

authority, from any of the following, namely:- (A) architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; (20 of 1972.) or (B) chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or (C) licensed surveyor … due consideration of the same, it recorded the following findings in para 38:­ “38. A perusal of the aforesaid guidelines would indicate that after making … of by this common judgment. Civil Appeal (Diary No.24399 of 2020) 2. Delay condoned. 13. This appeal under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, ‘the Act 1944’), as made applicable to the service

Manoj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN177

University, Jodhpur on 05.10.2004.6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for his registration as an Architect under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972) vide his application dt. 03.12.2004 to the Indian Council of … not dwell on this issue any further.20. This takes us to notice relevant provisions of the Act of 1972. Section 2 is the definition clause and it defines recognised qualification under Sub-clause (d) as under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means … law does not call for declaration of equivalence or recognition any more. 38. In the light of the aforesaid pronouncement, if Entry 1 in the

Sikand Construction Co. Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi364

the respondent bank for the work actually done up-to that date. M/s. Master, Sathe and Kothari were the architects with respect to the said contract in terms of Article 3 of the Articles of Agreement dated 27th … Rs. 48,355.29 p. as per its letter No. 583, dated 11th July, 1972 to the petitioner who is alleged to have accepted the same under … Sultan Singh, J. (1) This is a petition pending since April, 1975 under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing of the arbitration agreement contained in Contract dated 27th April, 1965, relating to construction of

Federal Republic of Germany Vs. S. Dey and Associates and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 18, 19 and 31

Reported in : AIR1976Cal291

Road, Alipore, Calcutta, at agreed rates and specifications under the supervision of M. M. Bilaney & Co., the Architects and Consulting Engineer (hereinafter referred to as the said Architects).4. Subletting or assigning the contract without the written … A purported award made by one R.P. Banerjee on the 28th August, 1972 should be set aside;(b) The respondent S. Dey & Associates or its … of the Federal Republic of Germany has made this application under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 praying, inter alia, for orders that(a) A purported award made by one R.P. Banerjee on the 28th … General of the Federal Republic of Germany has made this application under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 praying, inter alia, for

Aurobindo Pharma Limited Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 59(1); Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Zoning Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 12; Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Multi-storied Buildings Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 19; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 428, 429, 452, 453, 454, 456, 461, 462, 463, 586, 589, 596, 675, 676, 676-E, 677, 678, 679 and 679(1 and E); Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Buildings Rules, - Rules 3 and 18; Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, 1979 - Sections 3; Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 3, 208, 229 and 230; Andhra Pradesh Town Planning Act, 1920 - S

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD647; 1998(5)ALT580

by the Government was extensively published and discussed at various Fora, meetings were held with all groups like Architects, Builders Fora, Floor Leaders, Elected Representatives etc. The draft policy was also placed on the Floor of the … may consider necessary for carrying out the purposes of this Act.' 2. The Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Buildings) Bye-Laws, 1972 Section 80 which deals with the power of Government to exempt Buildings, reads as under: 'The Government either suo-motu