Advanced Search Results

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope interference

S. Borappa and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, Urba ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 25 and 37; Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 3(L)

Reported in : ILR2003KAR5127; 2004(2)KarLJ425

of Section 3, which states that: 'A person having experience in Architecture', Further he placed reliance on the Architects Act, 1972. The 'Architect' is defined under sub-section (a) of Section 2 as: 'Architect' means a person whose name is … an architect registered under this Act.'Further, there is a prohibition against the use of title of Architect under Section 37 of the said Act. In view of the said mandatory provisions of the Central Act, if there is

Girish Mistry, Chairman, Indian Institute of Architects Vs. State of G ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 37; Architects (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulation 1; Gujarat Housing Board Act, 1961 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR2001Guj16

Architectural Consultancy Firm.2. Short facts which are relevant to dispose of this petition are as under :3. The Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Architects Act') has been enacted by the Parliament which provides for Council of … the register maintained under the Act. It is for the Council to prescribe minimum standard of architectural education. Section 37 of the Architects Act prohibits use of title unless he is a registered architect. Section 37 of the

Indian Institute of Architects Vs. A.P. Health and Medical Housing and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 37

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD20

arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as well as the provisions of the Architects Act, 1972 ('the Act'). 2. The first respondent is a Government of Andhra Pradesh Enterprise engaged in the development of … the Act, no person can use the title as architect and that any person contravening the provisions of Section 37(1) of the Act is liable for punishment on first conviction with fine which may extend to Rs.500/- and

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … is registered under the Act. The Legislation is generally on the same line as similar Act in other countries.'Section 37 of the Act prescribes that after the expiry of one year from the date and pointed under sub

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … of „architect‟ or its derivatives or using the same in their name. In this regard, he relies on Section 37 of the Act, which categorically prohibits any person other than a registered architect from using the title and

Premendra Raj Mehta and ors Vs. National Building Construction Corp. L ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Sharma, Advs for Council of Architecture CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Section 37(1) of the Architects Act, 1972 reads as under:37. Prohibition against use of title. (1) After the expiry of one year from the date

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed

Rajinder Kumar vs.council of Architecture & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

public notice whereby it was stated that the Council has been receiving complaints regarding the violation of the Architects Act, 1972 (hereafter ‗the Act‘) by foreign architects, consulting firms and others by way of hiring foreign architects to provide … by way of hiring foreign architects to provide architectural services, without following the due procedure in terms of Section 37 of the Act. The said public notice further stated that several Indian architects have been working as local