Advanced Search Results

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope interference by Courts in

All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Council of Architecture ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Section 3(3)(b); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2(g), 10; Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Section 35

1. A short but interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of Section 3 (3) (b) of the Architects Act, 1972 (AA) arises for consideration in this writ petition. 2. The Petitioner, All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), … AICTE on the COA from the years 1990-1993 and 2003-06. It is pointed out that in terms of Section 35 of the Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 (COA Rules) one of three members of Disciplinary Committee of the

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … for more than 5 years prior to 27th April, 1974.'The petitioner has also prayed for a declaration that Section 35 and 37 of the Act violate Article 14 and 19(l)(g) of the Constitution and are, thereforee, unconstitutional. (2)

S. Borappa and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, Urba ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 25 and 37; Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 3(L)

Reported in : ILR2003KAR5127; 2004(2)KarLJ425

of Section 3, which states that: 'A person having experience in Architecture', Further he placed reliance on the Architects Act, 1972. The 'Architect' is defined under sub-section (a) of Section 2 as: 'Architect' means a person whose name is … time being entered in the register'. He also placed reliance on Section 14 read with Section 25 and Section 35 and 37 of the said Act and also the Annexure-B which is the public Notice issued by the

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 30, 30(1), 35 and 45; Architects Act (Professional Misconduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulations 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 78; Right to Information Act (RTI); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rule 35(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

as the Conduct Regulations. These have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972. Nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the notice for hearing have respondent … view to show his eligibility for appointment to the post of Principal.14. The Disciplinary Committee as contemplated under Section 35 of the Council of Architecture Rules 1973 consists of three members, as provided under Rule 35(l)(a). The Council

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … profession of an architect or use the title and style of 'architect' or its derivatives.13. Placing reliance on Section 35, Mr. Nath contends that the provisions of this section in itself show that any reference in any law

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed

Mahipal Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

action and punishes the concerned advocate if he is guilty of any misconduct etc. Reference was made to Architects Act, 1972, Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, Company Secretaries Act, 1980, Pharmacy Practice Regulations, 2015, Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct Etiquettes … enrollment of a person as an advocate. Only other relevant provision under which action could be taken is Section 35 for proved misconduct. It is further stated that though the High Court directed the Bar Council of Uttar

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency (Nta) Department of High Ed ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

to the effect: NOTIFICATION "COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE New Delhi, The 12th February, 2019 (STATUTORY AUTHORITY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972) F. No.CA/12/2019/Regulations.-In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (e), (g), (h), and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section … of Senior School Certificate Examination or equivalent with Mathematics as a subject of examinations at the 10+2 level” 35. Vide notification No.F.No.C/1/2017/Regulation, Regulation 4(1) was amended on 29.5.2017 and sub regulations (1) and (2) of Regulation 4