Advanced Search Results

Balbir Verma and ors. Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Section 30(2); ;All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987; ;Architects (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulation 2(1)

prohibit the Council from proceeding with any hearing or enquiry against the petitioners under Section 30(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.2. The order dated 26th May 2006 passed by this Court set outs succinctly the issues raised in the

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … frame syllabus of the courses of study under its purview. Under section 30(1) of the said Act, the Academic Council of the University is the

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 30, 30(1), 35 and 45; Architects Act (Professional Misconduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulations 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 78; Right to Information Act (RTI); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rule 35(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

eligible along with 4 other candidates. The petitioner had disclosed that he has a Ph.D. from Ashwood University.Under Section 30 of the Architects Act, 1972, if on receipt of a complaint made to it, the Council is of … as the Conduct Regulations. These have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972. Nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the notice for hearing have respondent

All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Council of Architecture ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Section 3(3)(b); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2(g), 10; Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Section 35

1. A short but interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of Section 3 (3) (b) of the Architects Act, 1972 (AA) arises for consideration in this writ petition. 2. The Petitioner, All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), … Act 1987, the AICTE was established by a Resolution of the Government of India by a Notification dated 30 th November 1945. The Council of Architecture (COA), Respondent No. 1 herein, is constituted under Section 3 (1)

Brig Rajinder Singh (Retd) vs National Stock Exchange and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Petitioner’s fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution and Section 30 of the Architects Act, 1972; b. Issue an appropriate writ directing Respondent No. 1 to admit the Claim made by the Petitioner vide

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as "CA Act"). Sections 29, 30 and 33 of the Advocates Act, which specifically prohibit persons, other than … rendered by those to whom the Act applies. He submits that the expression „architect‟ has been defined under Section 2(a) of the Act to mean a person whose name is for the time being entered into the

Akshaya JaIn Vs. Airports Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1086; 2000(3)ARBLR563(Delhi); 87(2000)DLT330; 2000(55)DRJ183; 2000(3)RAJ256

was also informed by the petitioner that the Council of Architecture which is a statutory body under the Architects Act, 1972 was involved in selecting the best design in the competition for the project of Civil Aviation Training Centre. … ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an arbitration petition, on behalf of the petitioner, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') seeking the appointment of … The petitioner was able to complete the work with due diligence on 30th April, 1997 and the said project was awarded JITA Award-1999 for 'Excellence

Sanjay Gupta Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Its Chief Secretary

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

intent and purport, they are in the construction business.971. The profession of the architects are governed by the Architects Act, 1972. It is expected that they would not commit any professional misconduct. Their ability and competence is not in … matter was referred to the Delhi Legal Aid and Advice Board. Para 30 of the order reads thus: “30. Before we part with this topic, … They enjoyed great clout with the concerned authorities.481. They have singularly failed to comply with the provisions of Section 54 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and Rule 47A of the Indian Electricity Rules, 1956.482. The Organizers had

Minor S. AswIn Kumar, Rep. by His Father and Natural Guardian Mr. P. S ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Commisionerate of Higher Education Act, 1986; Andhra University Act, 1926; Architects Act, 1972; Architectural Regulation, 1983; Central Acts; Constitution of India - Schedule 7 - Articles 14, 14(2), 15(4), 15(5), 30(1), 162, 245, 245(1), 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 254, 254(1) and 254(2); Constitutional amendment Forty-second Amendment Act, 1976; Dentists Act, 1948; Electricity Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107 and 107(1); Income Tax Act 1961; Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947; Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984; Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 20 and 33; Medical Council Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 - Regulation 5(2); Medical University Act - Sections 5(5); Minimum

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC677

Vice-Chancellor Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli-620 024 Member3. Thiru. K. Parthasarathi Former Law Secretary 30, Ranganathan Street Triplicane, Chennai-5. (Phone No. 28549595, 28414486) Member4' Secretary to Government … Bachelor of Dental Surgery.(2) in Engineering institution, the first year of,(i) Bachelor of Engineering;(ii)Bachelor of Technology; and(iii)Bachelor of Architecture.And includes any other professional educational courses at undergraduate and postgraduate level, as may be notified by the Government … yet to be amended. Therefore, the State Government enacted the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Admission in Professional Courses Act, 2006, where by the Common Entrance Test for the State Board students was abolished. The students belonging to … medium and under-privileged students, while the urban, English medium and socially forward sections of students stand to benefit.Theoretically it is possible, without a CET, to

Manoj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN177

University, Jodhpur on 05.10.2004.6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for his registration as an Architect under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972) vide his application dt. 03.12.2004 to the Indian Council of … not dwell on this issue any further.20. This takes us to notice relevant provisions of the Act of 1972. Section 2 is the definition clause and it defines recognised qualification under Sub-clause (d) as under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means … both the learned Counsel the Division Bench passed the following order on 30.08.2007:It is agreed by the learned Advocates appearing in this matter that the