Advanced Search Results

Manoj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN177

University, Jodhpur on 05.10.2004.6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for his registration as an Architect under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972) vide his application dt. 03.12.2004 to the Indian Council of … not dwell on this issue any further.20. This takes us to notice relevant provisions of the Act of 1972. Section 2 is the definition clause and it defines recognised qualification under Sub-clause (d) as under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means … Jai Narain Vyas University, the Registrar had necessary authority to decline to register the candidate in terms of Section 26(2) read with Section 21 of the Act.14. Learned Counsel also stressed that though under Entry 32 in the

Akshaya JaIn Vs. Airports Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1086; 2000(3)ARBLR563(Delhi); 87(2000)DLT330; 2000(55)DRJ183; 2000(3)RAJ256

was also informed by the petitioner that the Council of Architecture which is a statutory body under the Architects Act, 1972 was involved in selecting the best design in the competition for the project of Civil Aviation Training Centre. … ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an arbitration petition, on behalf of the petitioner, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') seeking the appointment of … were given to the petitioner. Finally the petitioner issued a letter dated 26.5.1999 calling upon the respondent to clear the dues of the petitioner within

institute of Town Planners, India Vs. Council of Architecture and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 COA to operate within the framework of The Architects Act, 1972..2. Notice of the petition was issued and on the application of the petitioner for interim relief, vide … (MHRD). The counsels have been heard..3. The petitioner, in the year 1951, was incorporated as a company under Section 26 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 (equivalent of Section 25 of W.P.(C) No.8653/2008 Page 2 of 21 the

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … rendered by those to whom the Act applies. He submits that the expression „architect‟ has been defined under Section 2(a) of the Act to mean a person whose name is for the time being entered into the … Mishra, Adv. &Ms.Jomol, Adv. for R-4. + W.P.(C) 1435/2014 & C.M. Nos.2977/2014, 26660/2017, 32491/2017 & 37116/2017 BDP DESIGN ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … No.1 to the Indian Trade Promotion Organization (ITPO)/respondent No.2 by letter dated 26.02.2014 for engaging the services of foreign architects for the Pragati Maidan Redevelopment

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … No.1 to the Indian Trade Promotion Organization (ITPO)/respondent No.2 by letter dated 26.02.2014 for engaging the services of foreign architects for the Pragati Maidan Redevelopment

The Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction C ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

for engaging the services of foreign architects is in contravention of the provisions of Section 37(1) of the Architects Act, 1972. The petitioner, therefore, seeks a direction to the respondent No.4 to establish an institutionalized system and lay down … above W.P.(C) 4111/2017 Page 2 of 6 to is made contention. We found that in the letter dated 26.02.2014, it was made clear that the specific approval in terms of Section 37(1)(b) of the Act would be

Nirupa Puliyel vs.council of Architecture and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

passed by respondent no.1 rejecting the application filed by the petitioner seeking registration as an architect under the Architects Act,1972 (hereafter „the Act‟).2. The petitioner was awarded a “Degree of Master of Architecture” from the University of Edinburgh … returned to India after completing her training of six years in Architecture and applied to respondent no.1 under Section 26 of the Act for registration as an Architect. The said application was rejected by the impugned order on

Tata Housing Development Company Limited Vs. Aalok Jagga

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

area of Sukhna Lake has been declared as Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary under Section 26­A of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 by Chandigarh Administration vide Notification No.694­HII(4)98/4519 dated 6th March 1998 (copy enclosed). The Tata Housing Project falls in … sanctuaries, and preserve Sukhna Lake. The Conservator of Forests of Chandigarh has written a letter to the Chief Architect, UT of Chandigarh, for the inclusion of the area proposed as Wildlife Corridor along with the approval accorded

Sharan Desai M.arch Usa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

04-01-2021, seeking nomination as a Member of the Council representing the Government of Karnataka, in terms of the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). On 23-06-2021, when the petitioner did not receive any reply … for short) was also promulgated on 20-02-1973. Chapter-II of the Act deals with Constitution of Council of Architecture. Section 3 thereof, reads as follows: “3. Constitution of Council of Architecture.-(1) The Central Government shall, by notification in … who form the Council. The term of one Sri B.V.Satish ended on 26-08-2021, who was the representative in the Council from the State of Karnataka.