Advanced Search Results

Manoj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN177

University, Jodhpur on 05.10.2004.6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for his registration as an Architect under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972) vide his application dt. 03.12.2004 to the Indian Council of … by way of demand of justice.7. The notice dt. 19.09.2005 was responded by reply dt. 30.09.2005. Relying on Section 21 of the Act of 1972, it was stated that:In order to declare a particular B.Arch qualification as recognized … not dwell on this issue any further.20. This takes us to notice relevant provisions of the Act of 1972. Section 2 is the definition clause and it defines recognised qualification under Sub-clause (d) as under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated 8th … shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under:

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 30, 30(1), 35 and 45; Architects Act (Professional Misconduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulations 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 78; Right to Information Act (RTI); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rule 35(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

as the Conduct Regulations. These have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972. Nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the notice for hearing have respondent … Without going into those technical objections, we may consider the averments therein. In terms of the mandate under Section 21 of the Architects Act, the Council has framed Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983, by which

Radhey Shyam Rastogi Vs. Ashish Kumar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21 and 21(1); Uttar Pradeseh Urban Buildings (Regulation of letting Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 17

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3624(SC); 2008(12)SCALE131; (2008)10SCC225; 2008AIRSCW6923; 2008(5)LH(SC)3255

before the prescribed authority under Section 21(1)(b) of the UP Urban Buildings (Regulation of letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (in short, 'the Act'), inter alia, on the grounds that the building was in a dilapidated condition and … without obtaining any order or direction from the prescribed authority, had filed a report obtained from a private architect who, in his report, indicated that the disputed premises was in a dilapidated and dangerous condition. Finally, on

Kum. Khayti Girish Purnima Kulkarni Vs. College of Architecture and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Regulation 4 of the Minimum Standard of Architecture Education Regulation, 1983 as ultra vires Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972 (for short, `the Act of 1972') and to quash and set aside the same. 3. Briefly stated, the … satisfy the qualitative requirement prescribed by the Council of Architecture. By virtue of the enabling provisions contained in section 21 r/w section 45(2) of the Act of 1972, the Council of Architecture has framed the Minimum Standards of

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency (Nta) Department of High Ed ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of powers conferred by clauses (e), (g), (h), and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section 45 read with Section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972 (20 of 1972), the Council of Architecture, with the approval of the Central … to the effect: NOTIFICATION "COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE New Delhi, The 12th February, 2019 (STATUTORY AUTHORITY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972) F. No.CA/12/2019/Regulations.-In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (e), (g), (h), and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … Statutory Body that is empowered to do so. He submitted that on a reading of the Notification dated 21.8.2018, issued by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India (MHRD) on the subject of conducting Joint

Kulwanti Rai JaIn Vs. District Judge, Moradabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1992 - Sections 21(1) and (2), 21(1A) and 34(8); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rules 17 and 17(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2215

the affidavit of architect that Rule 17 of U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 has been complied with. It is stated in paragraph 7 of the counter-affidavit that Sri Tripathi who has … of the learned counsel for the parties. It is necessary to quote the relevant provisions of the Act. Section 21 is quoted hereinbelow :'21. Proceedings for release of building under occupation of tenant.--(1) The prescribed authority may, on … affidavit, he has also filed a report of Sri Vijin Gupta an Architect along with the photograph which is dated 7.4.1992 and is annexed as

Council Of Architecture Vs. The Academic Society Of Architects (tasa)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Regulations was that the Regulations required the prior approval of the Central Government under Section 45 of The Architects Act, 1972, (in short referred to as ‘the Act’) before they are implemented and that no such prior approval was … that no such prior approval was obtained before issuing the impugned communications.3. The appellant herein took umbrage under Section 21 of the Act. The appellant also questioned the locus standi of the 1st respondent to challenge the impugned

State Bank of India Vs. Kundan Singh

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR2008Utr53

assessed the market value of the premises to be 5.28 lacs. Both the reports prepared by the two architects were supported by affidavit. The learned Prescribed Authority did not accept the market value as determined by the … moved by the landlord under Section 21(8) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent & Eviction) Act, 1972 (for short the Act) and fixed the rent of the disputed building @ Rs. 7,000/- per month. The