Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: architects act 1972 section 17 · Page 1 of about 258 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 04 2007

Manoj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-04-2007

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN177

University, Jodhpur on 05.10.2004.6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for his registration as an Architect under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972) vide his application dt. 03.12.2004 to the Indian Council of … and until the Schedule is amended in accordance with provisions of the Act of 1972 in terms of Section 17, any recognised qualification in terms of Section 2(d) of the Act is sufficient qualification for enrolment in the … not dwell on this issue any further.20. This takes us to notice relevant provisions of the Act of 1972. Section 2 is the definition clause and it defines recognised qualification under Sub-clause (d) as under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2005

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2015

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2015

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … June 2011, i.e. for the academic year June 2011 to May 2012. 17. Let us now consider whether it would be open to the University

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2010

Dharmarth Trust Jandk Jammu and ors.Vs. Dinesh Chander NandA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order VI Rule 17

is, for the time being, entered in the register of architects maintained under section 23 of the Architect Act, 1972 and also includes any person engaged in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, in rendering services in the … order dated 18.10.2007 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu in Civil Revision No. 177 of 2005 whereby the High Court dismissed the revision filed by the Dharmarth Trust (hereinafter referred to as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2012

institute of Town Planners, India Vs. Council of Architecture and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-04-2012

Subject : Education

of the Schedule is also of the Central Government, though again in consultation with the respondent No.1 COA. Section 17 of the Architects Act provides that possessing a recognized qualification shall be sufficient qualification for enrolment in the … direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 COA to operate within the framework of The Architects Act, 1972..2. Notice of the petition was issued and on the application of the petitioner for interim relief, vide

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2024

Chief Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax Vs. M/s Safari Ret ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2024

Subject : Service Tax

from any of the following, namely:- (i) an architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or (ii) a chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or (iii) a licensed surveyor of … issues which broadly arise in this group of matters concern clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of Civil Appeal No.2948 of 2023 etc. Page 1 of 91 the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1989

Utpal Bose and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-24-1989

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 414, 414(3) and 599;; Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1977 - Section 378;; Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 23, 25, 27, 29, 44, 44(2), 47 and 123;; Constitution of India - Article 246;; Bidhan Nagar Building Rules - Rule 50;; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 502

Reported in : AIR1991Cal48

was an upsurge of under-qualified persons describing themselves as architects and resulting in unsafe work of construction. The Architects Act, 1972 was engrafted in the Statute Book to provide for the registration of architects so as to eradicate the … so as to eradicate the unqualified and under-qualified persons taking upon the responsibility in that regard as architects.2. Section 25 of the Act of 1972 provides that a person shall be entitled, on payment of a fee … Corporation to disregard of any law for the time being in force.' 17. On the wake of the above provision and by reason of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2018

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2018

Subject : Education

first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … classified columns of the trade / professional directory and/or telephone directory/ website.” 17. Mr. Nath places specific reliance on Regulations 2(i), (xii), (xiii) and (xiv) … rendered by those to whom the Act applies. He submits that the expression „architect‟ has been defined under Section 2(a) of the Act to mean a person whose name is for the time being entered into the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2017

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2017

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2017

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2017

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial