Advanced Search Results

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope … profession of Architects and enactments dealing with Medical and Legal professions. Section 15(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 bars any person other than

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 30, 30(1), 35 and 45; Architects Act (Professional Misconduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulations 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 78; Right to Information Act (RTI); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rule 35(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

as the Conduct Regulations. These have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972. Nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the notice for hearing have respondent … published research work which can be considered equivalent to Ph.D. There was also requirement of work experience of 15 years in Teaching/Practice/Research out of which 5 years had to be at the level of Professor. Candidate who

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … stated that he had been in the architectural profession for the last 15 years and had designed and supervised a number of buildings including residential, … S.B. Wad, J. (1) In this petition, under Section 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the order of the Council of Architecture passed on October

Manoj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN177

University, Jodhpur on 05.10.2004.6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for his registration as an Architect under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972) vide his application dt. 03.12.2004 to the Indian Council of … not dwell on this issue any further.20. This takes us to notice relevant provisions of the Act of 1972. Section 2 is the definition clause and it defines recognised qualification under Sub-clause (d) as under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means … under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means any qualification in architecturefor the time being included in the schedule or notified under Section 15.21. Apparently under the Act the recognised qualification is either one which is included in the Schedule or is

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors. Vs. Ram Kumar Bhardwaj and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 2(25)

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT283

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) The respondents are registered as architects under the Architects Act, 1972 and practice assuch in the Union Territory of Delhi. They filed two writ petitionschallenging the power of the … licensed under theprovisions of this Act as an architect, draughtsman,engineer, plumber, surveyor and town planner'.Since the definition of section 2(25) contemplates that a licensedarchitect or a licensed draughtsman is to be a person who is licensedunder the … 1957. The resolution No. 724, dated 3-9-1974, andthe orders dated 2-4-1975 and 15-4-1975 were also apparently quashed by allowing the writ petitions as a whole.

Nirupa Puliyel vs.council of Architecture and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

passed by respondent no.1 rejecting the application filed by the petitioner seeking registration as an architect under the Architects Act,1972 (hereafter „the Act‟).2. The petitioner was awarded a “Degree of Master of Architecture” from the University of Edinburgh … United Kingdom (UK), as specified in Entry no.6 in notification dated 21.02.1973 issued by the Central Government under Section 15(1) of the Act.3. Thus, the controversy involved in the present petition is essentially limited to whether the degree

Premendra Raj Mehta and ors Vs. National Building Construction Corp. L ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Sharma, Advs for Council of Architecture CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Section 37(1) of the Architects Act, 1972 reads as under:37. Prohibition against use of title. (1) After the expiry of one year from the date … 1972 to which certain functions have been statutorily assigned under the provisions of the said Act. For instance, Section 15 of the Act provides for consultation with the Council before recognizing architectural qualification granted by the authorities in

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … of this work is Rs.1765 Crore as per scope given below: ……………………………." 15. We also do not find any substance in the contention that as

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … of this work is Rs.1765 Crore as per scope given below: ……………………………." 15. We also do not find any substance in the contention that as

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … of S.Y. B.Arch course should not be in more than four papers. 15. It is at this stage that Regulation 2 of the Minimum Standards