Advanced Search Results

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … As per the regulations framed by the Council of Architecture, there are 12 papers in each academic year, out of which 4 papers are theory

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … marks in 10+2 CBSE Examination conducted for the Academic Year 2017-2018, which comes to 64.4% marks in the 12th Standard examination. Intending to pursue the five year Bachelor of Architecture Degree Course, the appellant submitted an application

Sanjay Gupta Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Its Chief Secretary

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

intent and purport, they are in the construction business.971. The profession of the architects are governed by the Architects Act, 1972. It is expected that they would not commit any professional misconduct. Their ability and competence is not in … Mrinal Events and Expositions who are being represented as Respondents 10 to 12 herein. For the sake of convenience, Respondents 10-12 are being collectively referred … They enjoyed great clout with the concerned authorities.481. They have singularly failed to comply with the provisions of Section 54 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and Rule 47A of the Indian Electricity Rules, 1956.482. The Organizers had

Utpal Bose and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 414, 414(3) and 599;; Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1977 - Section 378;; Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 23, 25, 27, 29, 44, 44(2), 47 and 123;; Constitution of India - Article 246;; Bidhan Nagar Building Rules - Rule 50;; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 502

Reported in : AIR1991Cal48

was an upsurge of under-qualified persons describing themselves as architects and resulting in unsafe work of construction. The Architects Act, 1972 was engrafted in the Statute Book to provide for the registration of architects so as to eradicate the … so as to eradicate the unqualified and under-qualified persons taking upon the responsibility in that regard as architects.2. Section 25 of the Act of 1972 provides that a person shall be entitled, on payment of a fee

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope

Sudhir Vohra vs.registrar of Companies and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

the Architects Act, 1972. That being the WP (C) No.934/2012& conn. Page 12 of 46 position and with this clarification, we dispose of these appeals”. … first writ petition bearing No.W.P.(C) No.934/2012 has been preferred by Mr. Sudhir Vohra, an architect registered under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), mainly seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Registrar … rendered by those to whom the Act applies. He submits that the expression „architect‟ has been defined under Section 2(a) of the Act to mean a person whose name is for the time being entered into the

Ranjan Lakule Vs. Council of Architecture India Habitant Centre and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 30, 30(1), 35 and 45; Architects Act (Professional Misconduct) Regulations, 1989 - Regulations 1(2), 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations Act, 1983; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 78; Right to Information Act (RTI); Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Rule 35(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR479

as the Conduct Regulations. These have been framed pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 45 of the Architects Act, 1972. Nowhere in the complaint or in the show-cause notice issued or in the notice for hearing have respondent

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii)

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii)

Rajinder Kumar vs.council of Architecture & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

public notice whereby it was stated that the Council has been receiving complaints regarding the violation of the Architects Act, 1972 (hereafter ‗the Act‘) by foreign architects, consulting firms and others by way of hiring foreign architects to provide … 1972. Issued in public interest. Dated :16. 02.2015 New Delhi‖ Offg. Registrar 12. A plain reading of the aforesaid public notice indicates that the Council … by way of hiring foreign architects to provide architectural services, without following the due procedure in terms of Section 37 of the Act. The said public notice further stated that several Indian architects have been working as