Advanced Search Results

Akshaya JaIn Vs. Airports Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1086; 2000(3)ARBLR563(Delhi); 87(2000)DLT330; 2000(55)DRJ183; 2000(3)RAJ256

was also informed by the petitioner that the Council of Architecture which is a statutory body under the Architects Act, 1972 was involved in selecting the best design in the competition for the project of Civil Aviation Training Centre. … ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an arbitration petition, on behalf of the petitioner, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') seeking the appointment of an

Utpal Bose and Others Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 414, 414(3) and 599;; Calcutta Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1977 - Section 378;; Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 23, 25, 27, 29, 44, 44(2), 47 and 123;; Constitution of India - Article 246;; Bidhan Nagar Building Rules - Rule 50;; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 502

Reported in : AIR1991Cal48

was an upsurge of under-qualified persons describing themselves as architects and resulting in unsafe work of construction. The Architects Act, 1972 was engrafted in the Statute Book to provide for the registration of architects so as to eradicate the … so as to eradicate the unqualified and under-qualified persons taking upon the responsibility in that regard as architects.2. Section 25 of the Act of 1972 provides that a person shall be entitled, on payment of a fee

Manoj Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN177

University, Jodhpur on 05.10.2004.6. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for his registration as an Architect under the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972) vide his application dt. 03.12.2004 to the Indian Council of … not dwell on this issue any further.20. This takes us to notice relevant provisions of the Act of 1972. Section 2 is the definition clause and it defines recognised qualification under Sub-clause (d) as under:(d) 'recognised qualification' means … or institutions for imparting education in medicine. Before its amendment in 1993 w.e.f. 27.08.1992 the Act provided under Section 11 for recognition of medical qualification granted by Universities or Medical Institutions. It provided that medical qualification granted by

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]116TAXMAN418(Bom)

under article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners who are Associations of tax practitioners, Chartered Accountants and architects challenge the constitutional validity of section 116 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998. The Act envisages service … India, petitioners who are Associations of tax practitioners, Chartered Accountants and architects challenge the constitutional validity of section 116 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998. The Act envisages service tax at the rate of 5 per

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … percentile of successful candidates in their respective Class XII (or equivalent) examination of respective stream and LPA5752019 Page 11 of 28 in the Class XII Board. (ii) The candidate has secured minimum 75% (for GEN or OBC-NCL)

Sharan Desai M.arch Usa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

04-01-2021, seeking nomination as a Member of the Council representing the Government of Karnataka, in terms of the Architects Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). On 23-06-2021, when the petitioner did not receive any reply … for short) was also promulgated on 20-02-1973. Chapter-II of the Act deals with Constitution of Council of Architecture. Section 3 thereof, reads as follows: “3. Constitution of Council of Architecture.-(1) The Central Government shall, by notification in … MINISTRY OF EDUCATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY302C, SHASTRI BHAWAN NEW DELHI - 110 001.4. THE COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE (COA) REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR - SECRETARY

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … rules framed by the respondent-university override regulation 2(3) of the Minimum Standards of Architectural Education, 2008 prescribed under section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision dated … the standards prescribed by the Regulations made by the Council of Architecture. 11. On a harmonious reading of the aforesaid Rules, it is clear that

Hari Datt Vashist and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 337(1)

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi28

behalf of the Corporation that on November 9, 1972, a communication was sent to the petitioners and their architects requiring them to supply certain information and make corrections in the notice and on the failure of the … regard to request for sanction sought vide the petitioners communication of January 11, 1973, the plans enclosed with that communication would also be deemed to … true meaning and correct interpretation as well as the application of certain provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, for short the Act. (2) The petitions were filed in the following circumstances : Amin Chand, grandfather … a layout plan in respect of the land which was sanctioned under section 313 of the Act by the Standing Committee of the Corporation in