Advanced Search Results

Rajashree Bokade and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 3 and 23(3); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10; Nagpur University Act, 1974 - Sections 39 and 40; Minimum Standard of Architectural Education Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj571

regulations committed by them. Noorder as to costs. Constitution - renewal - Sections 3 and 23 (3) of Architects Act, 1972, Section 10 of All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, Sections 39 and 40 of Nagpur University Act, 1974,

All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Council of Architecture ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Section 3(3)(b); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2(g), 10; Council of Architecture Rules, 1973 - Section 35

1. A short but interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of Section 3 (3) (b) of the Architects Act, 1972 (AA) arises for consideration in this writ petition. 2. The Petitioner, All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), … areas as the central government may, in consultation with the council by notification in the Official Gazette declare. Section 10 of the AICTE Act 1987 states that it shall be the duty of the Council (AICTE) to "take

Ishan S. Darekar and Others Vs. University of Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

shall be of 2 academic years/ 4 semesters including one year of practical training. (5) Registration under the Architects Act, 1972, is acceptable only after successful completion of both the stages." 4. The relevant University Rule reads as under: … AICTE Act and Parliament never meant that the provisions of the Architects Act stand pro tanto repealed by section 10 of the AICTE Act. We, therefore, hold that the provisions of the Architects Act are not impliedly repealed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors. Vs. Ram Kumar Bhardwaj and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 2(25)

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT283

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) The respondents are registered as architects under the Architects Act, 1972 and practice assuch in the Union Territory of Delhi. They filed two writ petitionschallenging the power of the … thereforee, to see for such provisions in thebye-laws. Bye-laws 6, 9 and 10(2) of the Building Bye-laws. 1959refer to the licensed architects as being persons … licensed under theprovisions of this Act as an architect, draughtsman,engineer, plumber, surveyor and town planner'.Since the definition of section 2(25) contemplates that a licensedarchitect or a licensed draughtsman is to be a person who is licensedunder the

Mukesh Kumar Manhar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 23, 23(1), 24, 24(2), 25, 35, 35(2), 37 and 37(1); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2); Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1969; Madhya Pradesh Public Works Engineering (Gazetted) Service Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT270; 2006(1)MPLJ238

stood a chance of being promoted as Assistant Architects.4. Petitioners submits that having regard to the provision of Architects Act, 1972, only persons possessing a degree in Architecture (or Diplomas recognised as equivalent and enumerated in the Schedule to … without prescribing the qualification of 'Registered Architect', is repugnant to the provisions of a central enactment, that is Section 37(1) and Section 35(2) of the Architects Act, 1972.7. It is also equally well settled that the scope

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … impracticable for such a large body to meet for each appeal. The Legislature is aware of this difficulty. Section 10(1) of the Act, thereforee, provides that the council may constitute committees for such general or special purposes as

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5752019 IN THE MATTER OF: PRATEEK SINGHAL Reserved on:17. 10.2019 Date of decision:31. 10.2019 Through : Mr. R.M. Sinha and Mr. P.M. Sinha, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL

Indian Institute of Architects vs.national Building Construction Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … months or with fine not exceeding one thousand rupees or with both." 10. A plain reading of Sections 36 and 37 would show that the

Indian Institute of Archetects vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

has been assailed in the present petition primarily on the following grounds: (i) NIT is in violation of Architects Act, 1972 and the Regulations framed thereunder. Having invited tenders for providing "comprehensive architectural services", NBCC should not have allowed … engineering consultants also to submit bids along with architects. The said action of NBCC is in violation of Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Architects Act, 1972. W.P.(C) No.8635/2016 & 9702/2016 Page 2 of 11 (ii) … months or with fine not exceeding one thousand rupees or with both." 10. A plain reading of Sections 36 and 37 would show that the

Chief Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax Vs. M/s Safari Ret ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

from any of the following, namely:- (i) an architect registered with the Council of Architecture constituted under the Architects Act, 1972; or (ii) a chartered engineer registered with the Institution of Engineers (India); or (iii) a licensed surveyor of … to the said immovable property; (e) goods or services or both on which tax has been paid under Section 10; (f) goods or services or both received by a non-resident taxable person except on goods imported by him;