Advanced Search Results

Worldwide Knowledge Foundation vs Council of Architecture

Court : Kerala

conferred by clauses (e), (g),(h) and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section 45 read with Section 21 ofthe Architects Act, 1972, the 1 st respondent Council of Architecture, with the approval of the Central Government, made the minimum standards … Architectural Education Regulations,1983. Regulation 8 deals with standards of staff, equipment,accommodation, training and other facilities for technical education. Appendix-B of the Regulations deals with designation, pay scale, qualification, etc., required for faculty positions and Appendix-C deals with

Noble Educational Trust vs Counciil of Architecture

Court : Kerala

conferred by clauses (e), (g),(h) and (j) of sub-section (2) of Section 45 read with Section 21 ofthe Architects Act, 1972, the 1 st respondent Council of Architecture, with the approval of the Central Government, made the minimum standards … Architectural Education Regulations,1983. Regulation 8 deals with standards of staff, equipment,accommodation, training and other facilities for technical education. Appendix-B of the Regulations deals with designation, pay scale, qualification, etc., required for faculty positions and Appendix-C deals with

A.Dharmakeerthi vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

FLOOR AND REPLACEMENT WITH FLOOR SLAB BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED ANNEXURE-D TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE CONDITION OF ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE, NEW DELHI SPECIFYING ARCHITECTS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY ND EXCEPTS ANNEXURE E TRUE COPY … from Crime No.3/2009/SIU-1 of VACB, SIU-I, Thiruvananthapuram against the petitioner will stand quashed. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS Sbna JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-A CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CC 3/20 PENDING BEFORE THE SPL JUDGE VIGILANCE TRIVANDRUM … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS THURSDAY, THE

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … ST, OBC and PwD candidates will be required to produce original certificate as per prescribed formats given in Appendix-7, issued by the competent authority at the time of Seat Allocation Process as well as at the time … * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5752019 IN THE MATTER OF: PRATEEK SINGHAL

institute of Town Planners, India Vs. Council of Architecture and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 COA to operate within the framework of The Architects Act, 1972..2. Notice of the petition was issued and on the application of the petitioner for interim relief, vide … *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 + WP(C) NO.8653/2008 INSTITUTE OF TOWN

Irene Rose Justin, vs Chairman,

Court : Kerala

a five year course and as per the Regulations framed by the Council under Section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972, the stage of course shall be the first 3 academic years :-64-: or 6 semesters of institutional academic … petitions are :-69-: dismissed. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Sd/- T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE ami/ :-70-: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19885/2015 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF G.O(RT) NO.1128/2013/H.EDN DATED 10.6.2013 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE

Shamil T., vs Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Professional ...

Court : Kerala

a five year course and as per the Regulations framed by the Council under Section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972, the stage of course shall be the first 3 academic years :-64-: or 6 semesters of institutional academic … petitions are :-69-: dismissed. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Sd/- T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE ami/ :-70-: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19885/2015 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF G.O(RT) NO.1128/2013/H.EDN DATED 10.6.2013 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … of annexure P. 6 the petitioner has produced the duty chart of the junior engineers, as mentioned in appendix Xvi of the Central Public Works Department. The duty chart shows that the main functions of a junior … S.B. Wad, J. (1) In this petition, under Section 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the order of the Council of Architecture passed

Shri Dan Singh Bawa and ors. Vs. Ndmc and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 13(2), 189, 193(1), 193(2), 194, 336(3), 336(4) and 337(4)

Reported in : 2005(81)DRJ473

3. The four impugned letters dated 28.8.1973, 19.12.1973, 22.12.1973 and 23.1.1974 read as under:-(i) Letter dated 28.8.1973 'CHIEF ARCHITECT'S UNITNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEETOWN HALL: NEW DELHINO.CA/2963-64/BP Dated: 28.8.73Shri Dan Singh Bawa,Marshall House,Hanuman Road,New Delhi.Sub: Revalidation of plans … Cement was a control item under Delhi Cement (Licensing and Control) Order 1972. Petitioners were getting a quota fixed under said order till 1981 when … modified to maximum FAR of 150 and maximum ground coverage of 25%.In Appendix 'Q' of the building bye-laws for Delhi any violation of provision of … the parties who could have put to better use their time, money and energy in a more useful activity. As the facts would unfold, a simple issue has snow-balled into a complex issue. Petition filed in the … J.1. A stitch in time saves nine. Present case is a classic illustration of the proverb aforenoted.

Atul Kapur Vs. Arun Kapur and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Overseas Bank, namely (1) Doc.No.2732 of 1961, dated 6.11.1961, (2) Doc.No.1983 of 1972, dated 31.3.1972 and (3) Doc.No.2917, dated 09.06.1972, and (b) to dismiss the … be necessary beyond such as are exemplified in the forms in the Appendix, particulars (with dates and items if necessary) shall be stated in the … 25.07.2002 (Ex.P-8) enclosing regularisation fee, etc., for the construction. Ex.P-9, dated 13.07.2001 is the letter addressed by the Architect to M/s.L and T and Ex.P-10 series are the letter addressed by the Architect to the first defendant, … the file of the Sub-Registrar, Periamet, is sham and nominal, is without consideration and never intended to be acted upon to transfer the title of the property of the plaintiff in favour of the defendants and is … (Prayer: Plaint filed and numbered as Civil Suit under Order IV, Rule 1 of the