Advanced Search Results

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency, Department of High Educati ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

examination. Reference was made to the powers of the Council of Architecture, prescribed in Section 45(2)(h) of the Architects Act, 1972 to contend that the Council alone is entitled to formulate regulations for conducting professional examinations, prescribing qualifications of … ST, OBC and PwD candidates will be required to produce original certificate as per prescribed formats given in Appendix-7, issued by the competent authority at the time of Seat Allocation Process as well as at the time … AT NEW DELHI LPA5752019 IN THE MATTER OF: PRATEEK SINGHAL Reserved on:17. 10.2019 Date of decision:31. 10.2019 Through : Mr. R.M. Sinha and Mr. P.M.

Present: Mr. G.N.Malik Advocate Vs. Munit Kumar and Others ...Petition ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

5 years degree course, as per the instructions of the Council of Architecture, which is incorporated under the Architects Act, 1972. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of record, it is apparent that respondent no.1 … and norms of AICTE being an un-approved institution. It is further averred that as per AICTE norms under Appendix-I of Approval Process Hand Book 2013-14, eligibility criteria for admission in 5 years Architecture programme directly is “Passed

institute of Town Planners, India Vs. Council of Architecture and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 COA to operate within the framework of The Architects Act, 1972..2. Notice of the petition was issued and on the application of the petitioner for interim relief, vide

Om Prikash Mittal Vs. Council of Architecture and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi223; ILR1983Delhi197

petition is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Architects Act, 1972 - Sections 25(b), 35 & 37--Order refusing registration to the petitioner whether discriminatory and vocative of the Constitution--Whether … of annexure P. 6 the petitioner has produced the duty chart of the junior engineers, as mentioned in appendix Xvi of the Central Public Works Department. The duty chart shows that the main functions of a junior … challenged the order of the Council of Architecture passed on October 9, 1979, refusing the registration to the petitioner as an Architect, under Section 25(b)

New Woodlands Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Mr. Chandrakant T. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 26, Rule 8; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act; ;Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 2(25), 82, 83(1), 84(1), 84(3), 93(3), 93(4), 93(5), 96(3), 96(4), 96(5), 103I, 103I(2), 103I(5), 103I(6) and 103I(7)

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR74

A letter addressed by this architect to the Repair Board was placed on record. Mr. Rao from these architects was examined and he stated that there were only 8 tenants at that time. Thereafter the Petitioners examined … case is that his family stayed over there until May 1998 from 1972 onwards.19. Mr. Sunil Shah was examined as one of the tenants and … a view to accommodate the old tenants/occupiers and under clause 13 of Appendix III to DCR 33(7) no new tenancy created after 13th June 1996 … Respondent No. 2 -Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) (constituted under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976) in favour of Respondent No. 7. This N.O.C. permits Respondent No. 7 to demolish his old four … H.L. Gokhale, J.1. The 1st Petitioner herein is a cooperative housing society having

Shri Dan Singh Bawa and ors. Vs. Ndmc and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 13(2), 189, 193(1), 193(2), 194, 336(3), 336(4) and 337(4)

Reported in : 2005(81)DRJ473

3. The four impugned letters dated 28.8.1973, 19.12.1973, 22.12.1973 and 23.1.1974 read as under:-(i) Letter dated 28.8.1973 'CHIEF ARCHITECT'S UNITNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEETOWN HALL: NEW DELHINO.CA/2963-64/BP Dated: 28.8.73Shri Dan Singh Bawa,Marshall House,Hanuman Road,New Delhi.Sub: Revalidation of plans … Cement was a control item under Delhi Cement (Licensing and Control) Order 1972. Petitioners were getting a quota fixed under said order till 1981 when … modified to maximum FAR of 150 and maximum ground coverage of 25%.In Appendix 'Q' of the building bye-laws for Delhi any violation of provision of … the parties who could have put to better use their time, money and energy in a more useful activity. As the facts would unfold, a simple issue has snow-balled into a complex issue. Petition filed in the

Atul Kapur Vs. Arun Kapur and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Overseas Bank, namely (1) Doc.No.2732 of 1961, dated 6.11.1961, (2) Doc.No.1983 of 1972, dated 31.3.1972 and (3) Doc.No.2917, dated 09.06.1972, and (b) to dismiss the … be necessary beyond such as are exemplified in the forms in the Appendix, particulars (with dates and items if necessary) shall be stated in the … 25.07.2002 (Ex.P-8) enclosing regularisation fee, etc., for the construction. Ex.P-9, dated 13.07.2001 is the letter addressed by the Architect to M/s.L and T and Ex.P-10 series are the letter addressed by the Architect to the first defendant, … the file of the Sub-Registrar, Periamet, is sham and nominal, is without consideration and never intended to be acted upon to transfer the title of the property of the plaintiff in favour of the defendants and is

General Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Nandlal Engineering Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 5, 13, 30 and 33; General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956; Interest Act, 1978

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR311; 2002(1)BomCR619; 2002(1)MhLj183

the computation of the Contract sum shall be deemed to have been accepted by the parties hereto. 16. Architects decisions :16.1 ..........16.2 DecisionThe Architect shall within a reasonable time make decisions on all claims of the owner … stated :--The petitioners herein are the Government Company established under section 9 of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 having its registered Office at 170-J, Tata Road, Churchgate, Mumbai 400020 ('the petitioner' for short).3. The respondents are … or has been delayed beyond the date for completion stated in the appendix to these conditions or beyond any extended time previously fixed under this

Maharani Deepinder Kaur and ors. Vs. U.T. Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 8A and 10(4)

Reported in : (1996)114PLR598

dated 14-12-1976, a set of sketch plans in eight sheets with an appendix giving summary of the points to be resolved was sent. The Chief … Rules, the plans for the construction of the hotel at the site were to be sanctioned by Chief Architect, U.T. Chandigarh according to Architectural Control Sheets meant for public buildings. Petitioners have alleged that the architectural control … the site was to be made in accordance with the provisions of Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (for short, the Act) including the Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Buildings) Rules, 1960 (for short, the … the Constitution of India, prayer made is for quashing of order dated 11-5-1993 (Annexure P-46) whereby it has been conveyed by the Estate Officer, U.T.

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M.L. Dalmiya and Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13 and 30

Reported in : AIR1977Cal266,81CWN168

pipe on ball side) with cement brick work (1:4) shapad to required size and 1-8 projection as per Architect's drawing plastered complete with cement plaster ( 1:3).EachRs. 223/- (Rupees two hundred tewnty three only).81.81Cement brick work on … parties and oral and documentary evidence, published his award on September 25, 1972 for which extension of time was duly obtained. The award was purported … substituted items be paid to theclaim. ants at the rates shown in Appendix 'A' enclosed with the award. Thesaid Appendix 'A' is made a part … Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. The respondent, M. L. Dalmiya & Co. Ltd., an existing company under the Companies Act, 1956 hereinafter referred to as the Company, was employed by the Union of India, the appellant before us,