Advanced Search Results
Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-13-2008
ArbitrationElectricity
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 11, 11(5) and 11(6); Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulation) Act, 2003; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 79, 79(1), 86(1), 94(2), 158, 173, 174 and 175; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Mimansa Rules; State Grid Code; Constitution of India - Article 14; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996
AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169
Gujarat High Court dated 15.6.2006 which was passed on a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter in short 'the 1996 Act'). By that judgment the High Court has appointed Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. … the learned Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court dated 15.6.2006 which was passed on a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter in short 'the 1996 Act'). By that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S. Rani Construction Pv ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2000
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8
2000(7)SCALE211; (2000)2SCC388; [2000]Supp4SCR278; 2001(1)LC367(SC)
order dated 4-7-97 of the learned Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on the preliminary issues is a Judicial order and, on facts, is liable to be set aside under … has submitted that the order dated 4-7-97 of the learned Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on the preliminary issues is a Judicial order and, on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPratap Electrical and Co. Vs. Asea Brawn Boveri Ltd. (Abb)
Jharkhand
Feb-09-2005
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 11, 11(6) and 42
AIR2005Jhar95; 2005(2)BLJR943; [2005(2)JCR127(Jhr)]
whether the ouster clause contained in the agreement will oust the jurisdiction of the Court conferred by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.14. Section 42 of the Act of 1996 defines the jurisdiction for applications under the Act. Section 42 reads … M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In the instant application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the petitioner has prayed for appointment … 226 is maintainable further observed :'8. However, we must notice that in view of Section 16, read with Sections 12 and 13 of the Act, as interpreted by the Constitution Bench of this Court in Konkan Rly.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Grid Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. Vs. M/S. Indian Charge Chrome Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
May-13-1998
ArbitrationElectricity
Orissa Electricity Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 37(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 11; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2 and 24; Reform Act, 1995 - Sections 3, 14(1) and 33; Electricity (Supply), Act, 1948
1998IVAD(SC)488; AIR1998SC1761; 1998(1)ARBLR589(SC); 86(1998)CLT392(SC); JT1998(4)SC43; 1998(3)SCALE539; (1998)5SCC438; [1998]3SCR375
make any payment. But on the contrary on 30.4.97 ICCL filed a petition Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'Arbitration Act') in the Court of District Judge, Puri which was numbered as Arbitration Case No. … the ICCL filed a petition before the Orissa High Court Under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act being MJC No. 229/97 for appointment of an … Court set aside and respondent asked to pay arrears in installments.HELD See paras 14, 20 and 21. - Sections 3 &4: [Dr.Arijit Pasayat & Asok Kumar Ganguly, JJ] Dowry death-Death of wife by burn injuries Accused husband
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDabur India Ltd. Vs. Bsi Ltd.
Delhi
May-26-2000
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8 and 11
2000(56)DRJ497
S.N. Kapoor, J.1. The petitioner has filed an application under Section 8 read with Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called 'the Act' for short). The applicant company clams its registered office at 8/3, Asaf Ali Road, … S.N. Kapoor, J.1. The petitioner has filed an application under Section 8 read with Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called 'the Act' for short).
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhava Hytech Engineers Private Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-07-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)
2003(3)ALD60; 2003(3)ALT16; 2003(2)ARBLR417(AP)
ORDERDevender Gupta, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal to enter upon reference and resolve the disputes arising out of letter … the only conclusion would be is that the ghee would not fall within ambit of the definitions aforesaid. Sections 4 & 3: [V.V.S. Rao, N.V. Ramana & P.S. Narayana, JJ] Declaration of notified area Held, It is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBuilder and Associates Vs. Riico
Rajasthan
Oct-09-2003
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 16
AIR2004Raj81; 2004(2)WLC552
he was compelled to file this application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1996.3. Initially, the counsel for the non-applicant resisted the claim for referring the dispute to the arbitrator … was compelled to file this application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1996.3. Initially, the counsel for the non-applicant resisted the claim for referring the dispute to the arbitrator on two … was compelled to file this application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1996.3. Initially, the counsel for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Sudarshan Chopra and ors. Vs. Vijay Kumar Chopra and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-24-2002
ArbitrationCompany
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 5, 7, 8, 11(6), 11(7), 37, 39, 54 and 57; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 397 and 398; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2003]117CompCas660(P& H)
on 24.08.1999, sought permission of the Company Law Board to move an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Arbitration Act 1996') for reference (of the controversy raised by the respondents in Company … appellants, filed Company Petition No. 76 of 1999 before the Company Law Board, Principal Bench, New Delhi, under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 praying for relief on account of alleged oppression/mismanagement at the … cannot blur a distinction when dealing with the finer points of law'.' 11.2 Various illustrations in this behalf as noticed in the aforesaid judgment were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.T. Patil and Sons Belgaum (Construction) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Konkan Railwa ...
Mumbai
Dec-05-1997
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 10 and 20
1998(2)ALLMR107; 1998(4)BomCR111; (1998)1BOMLR744
of Contract. As the respondents failed to appoint Arbitrators, this application is filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Arbitration Act') for referring the dispute to arbitration as provided under the said … provisions of General Conditions of Contract. As the respondents failed to appoint Arbitrators, this application is filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Arbitration Act') for referring the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitation Infowares Limited Vs. Equinox Corporation
Supreme Court of India
Apr-20-2009
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(2), 11, 11(5) and 34; Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2009(3)AWC2683(SC); JT2009(8)SC316; (2009)7SCC220; 2009(5)LC2066(SC); MANU/SC/0836/2009
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This is an application under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applicant M/s Citation Infowares Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act carrying on business in … agreement - Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti (Exh. CJI) appointed as the sole Arbitrator - Application allowed - Sections 11 (5) & (9) & 2(2): [V.S. Sirpurkar] Appointment of arbitrator - International commercial agreement governed by laws of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »