Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: arbitration act 1940 sections 30 · Page 1 of about 4,217 results (0.122 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 1997

Shiv Lal Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-07-1997

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 14(2), 29, 30, 33 and 39; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 119

Reported in : AIR1997Raj93; 1997(2)WLC203; 1997(1)WLN56

A.S. Godara, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 39(i)(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and decree dated 6-5-1988 passed by the learned District … served on the appellant on 21-2-1981 and he filed his objections against the award purporting to be under Sections 30/33 (by implication) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, on 3-4-1981 and not before. There was no application under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1991

State of Orissa Vs. Shanti Devi and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-22-1991

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 29, 30 and 39(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Interest Act, 1839

Reported in : AIR1992Ori144

orders since Mahabir Prasad Agarwalla was dead by then. Those miscellaneous appeals preferred under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') were heard together as a common question of law was raised … the objections raised by the respondent before the trial court under Section 30 of the Act stand rejected. The trial court shall now consider the … This Court in the aforesaid judgment dated 23-12-1987 held that when the appointment of the Arbitrator was under Sections of the Act, he had jurisdiction to decide the question of limitation. When the Arbitrator on the facts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2001

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Gouri Construction Company and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-30-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 29, 30 and 33

Reported in : 2002(3)WLN139; 2002(3)WLN139

No. 1-A/97, an application was filed by the Union of India under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and the appellant-Union of India submitted objections against the award dated 25.7.1996 and prayed that the award may

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 01 1971

Union of India Vs. Baldev Dutt and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-01-1971

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi811

objection is whether the arbitrator misconducted himself and the proceedings within the meaning of section 30(a) of the Arbitration Act, 1940. No misconduct against the arbitrator personally has been alleged. What is seen. from the arbitration proceedings is that … as per the contract under section 6 of the Evidence Act and the admissions of the parties under sections 17 and 18 thereof. Secondly, the Executive Engineer representing the Government informed the arbitrator on 13-6-1968 that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1999

Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Vs. Anushree Constructors and C ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-11-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1 (3), 9, 21, 34, 34 (2) and (3), 36, 75, 81 and 85 (1) and (2); Arbitration Act (old), 1940 - Sections 30; Arbitration (Amendment) Act - 1980; Institutes of Technology Act, 1961; Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance, 1996; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 43; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3493

the parties hereto. The submission shall be deemed to be submission to arbitration under the meaning of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or any statutory modification re-enactment thereof for the time being in force.'3. The agreement containing aforequoted arbitration clause … writ petition is devoid of merits and deserves to be dismissed. Arbitration - proceedings under new Act - Sections 1 (3), 9 (ii) (4), 21, 34, 85(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 30 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1992

international Airports Authority of India Vs. Noor Mohammed and Sons

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-05-1992

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 30; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR155

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. This petition has been filed under section 30 of The Arbitration Act, 1940 to set aside the Award dated 6th June 1989 made and published by one Ramarao, sole arbitrator.2. The … S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. This petition has been filed under section 30 of The Arbitration Act, 1940 to set aside the Award dated 6th June 1989 made and published

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1999

Antyakula Eswara Rao Vs. Gudla Kumaraswamy and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-1999

Subject : ArbitrationFamily

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 30, 31(2), 32, 33, 34 and 35; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1); Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(15); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 158

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD740; 1999(6)ALT644

For proper appreciation of the case, it is necessary to refer to some of the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (No.X of 1940) (hereinafter called the 'Act'). Section 14 deals with the filing of the award which reads … in Section 32 that a suit on the original cause of action would be barred, the scheme of Sections 30, 31(2) and 32 would be that a suit on the original cause of action would be barred because

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2004

Airports Authority of India Vs. Sea Hawk Cargo Carriers P.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2004

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 30

Reported in : 2004(74)DRJ735

from the date of award till payment, a rule of the Court is upheld. Contract - agreement - Sections 2 and 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940 - appeal against judgment dismissing objection under Section 30 - appellant … 5th December, 2002 in Suit No.1112A/96 and is No.11711/96 which dismissed the objections under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940(hereinafter referred to as the `Act') has been preferred by the International Airport Authority of India(in short the IAAI).

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1999

Ghaziabad Development Authority, Ghaziabad and Others Vs. S.K. Gupta a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-01-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 21, 32 (1), 34, 34 (2), 35, 36, 75, 81, 85 (1) and (2); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 14, 14 (2), 15, 16, 17, 20, 30, 33 and 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 158; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 119

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1037

the revisionists did not file any objection against the awards under Sections 15, 16 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. It further appears that after expiry of the time for filing objections, the opposite parties filed two execution … for setting aside the award under Section 33 of the old Act on the grounds mentioned in Section 30 of the old Act. Such application could be moved within the period of limitation provided under Indian Limitation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1999

State of Rajasthan Vs. Nav Bharat Construction Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-10-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16(1), 29, 30 and 33

Reported in : AIR2000Raj180

1. The State has preferred this misc. appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short 'the Act') challenging the judgement and decree dt. 16-7-1996 passed by the District Judge Jhalawar, whereby … 29-5-1995 till payment. Against application dt. 30-5-1995 of the Company, the State raised objections besides submitted application Under Sections 30 & 33 of the Act on 3-7-1995 praying therein for setting aside the Award (sic) on 9-11-1995 the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial