Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Bhaskar Construction Co. and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 20(4)

of IAFW-2249 forming a part of the contract agreement and also under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The case of the petitioner is that, pursuant to the said letter … absence the office officiating as Engineer-in-Chief Army Headquarters, New Delhi whose decision shall be final, conclusive and binding.' 4. The respondent-opposite party started the work and completed the same on 31.12.1991. According to the petitioner, the final

The Union of India (Uoi) Owning the Central Railway Through the Genera ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9, 20 and 20(4); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 55 and 70

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR425

150 to 155 of 1987 are hereby allowed with costs. Arbitration - escalation - Sections 9, 20 and 20 (4) of Arbitration Act, 1940 and Sections 10, 55 and 70 of Contract Act, 1872 - respondent entered into … of the Arbitration Act, Shri Chandurkar, learned Counsel for the appellant, took me through the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Section 14 deals with award to be signed and filed. In the instant case there being no award,

Radical Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pharmaceutical Employees Co-op. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3 to 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(4) and 21; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 11(6); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 8, 8(1) and 8(2) - Article 137

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR171(Delhi); 137(2007)DLT709

Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. The respondents had set up … Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the … State of Rajasthan v. Mehta Chetan Dass Kishandass and AIR 1983 All 462 Sindh Construction Co. v. Union of India. The period of limitation prescribed

Food Corporation of India Vs. R.M. Pathare

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17, 20, 30 and 37(4); Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 787(5)

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR41; (1994)96BOMLR408

13th of December, 1979 the appellants filed Arbitration Petition No. 1932 of 1972 under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. In this petition the appellants have set out the loss suffered by them on account of the illegal … of 18% per annum from date of the Award till payment of realisation. (A) Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 & 37(4) - Reference to arbitration - Agreement prescribing period of limitation - Court can extend the time.;The

Ravindra Anant Deshmukh Vs. City and Industrial Development Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 20(4)

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR337; (1993)95BOMLR658

satisfied.7. In the result, the petition fails. Petition is accordingly dismissed with costs. Arbitration - sufficient cause - Sections 20 and 20 (4) of Arbitration Act, 1940 - petition filed under Section 20 for claiming certain amount from … D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. This is a petition under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The petition is numbered as a suit. The petition deserves to be dismissed in exercise of judicial discretion

Saha and Co. Vs. Ishar Singh Kripal Singh and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 15 to 17 and 30 to 33; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1956Cal321,60CWN471

certain Division Benches, we referred to the decision of a Full Bench the following questions:1 Does the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, distinguish between an application for setting aside an award and an application for the adjudgment of an award … award. It was not necessary to confer such right by Section 33.Other sections of the Act such as Sections 20 and 34 permit proceedings by the party who seeks to establish the existence and validity of arbitration agreement. … v. Societe Anonyme Sociente de Gestion D' Entreprises Coloniales' (1934) 150 LT 475 (G) was cited. There, the case of tho applicants who wanted the

Nbcc Vs. Am Rasool Constn. and Engineering Services (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9, 20, 22 and 33; Limitation Act; Indian Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)297; 2002(2)ARBLR183(Delhi); 97(2002)DLT498

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Short controversy in this petition under Section 33 of Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as Act) is as to the scope of arbitration agreement between the parties. Admittedly arbitration … dismissed. a) The case questioned when could objections as to the jurisdiction of arbitrator could be raised under Sections 33, 20, 2(a) and 39 of the Arbitration Act,1940 -It was ruled that the Court could be reached … respondent was only to provide labour for execution of the contract. Clause 4 of the general terms and conditions of the contract between the parties

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Sohan Lal Puglia

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 20(4)

Reported in : 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)147; 2003(3)ARBLR557(SC); 2003(10)SCALE318; (2004)1SCC768; 2004(1)LC293(SC)

an Arbitrator in terms thereof, an application was filed by the respondent herein under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and by reason of an order dated 7.4.97, the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur, appointed two … parties to appoint Arbitrators in consonance with the arbitration clause contained in the contract - Appeal allowed - Sections 12(a), (b), (j), 18 & 17:[Dr.Arijit Pasayat & Asok Kumar Ganguly,JJ] Jurisdiction of National Human Rights Commission Held,

M/S. Tribol Engineering Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11, 12, 20(4) 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 8, Rule 6A

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC385

'when an agreement is filed in Court and order of reference is made under Section 20(4) of the Arbitration Act,-1940, then the claim as a result of the order of reference is limited to a particular relief and … petition, prevents the same question being raised again and it has to be heard only to reject, because, Sections 5 and 11 of the Arbitration Act, empowers the Court to remove an Arbitrator who has misconducted himself

Mehta Teja Singh and Co. (Agencies) and Other Vs. Globe Motors Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 20(4); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 294, 297 and 314; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas883(Delhi)

J.1. This case is a good example of delay in litigation. An application under s. 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, was made by the petitioners, Mehta Teja Singh & Co. (Agencies), and its three partners, on 27th November, … and not otherwise (s. 297(4)). Sub-s. says : 'If consent is not accorded to any contract under this section, anything done in pursuance of the contract, shall be voidable at the option of the board.' 15. thereforee,