Advanced Search Results
Shiv Lal Vs. Food Corporation of India
Rajasthan
Jan-07-1997
Arbitration
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 14(2), 29, 30, 33 and 39; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 119
AIR1997Raj93; 1997(2)WLC203; 1997(1)WLN56
A.S. Godara, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 39(i)(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and decree dated 6-5-1988 passed by the learned District … served on the appellant on 21-2-1981 and he filed his objections against the award purporting to be under Sections 30/33 (by implication) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, on 3-4-1981 and not before. There was no application under … Depot, Chanderia for a period of two years beginning from 15-3-1974 to 14-3-1976. The appellant (Contractor) also submitted his tender and the same was accepted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFiltrex Consultatnts and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Sep-17-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 14(2) and 17; Limitation Act; Evidence Act - Sections 40, 41 and 42
2004IIAD(Delhi)102; 2003(3)ARBLR474(Delhi); 112(2004)DLT896; 2004(1)RAJ204
Trial Court on 17th November, 2003.13. The Trial Court file be sent back immediately. Arbitration - award - Sections 14, 14 (2) and 17 of Arbitration Act, 1940, Limitation Act and Sections 40, 41 and 42 of Evidence … original award and proceedings were admittedly not filed in the Court at Poonamallee. Under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the Arbitrator or the umpire at the request of any party to the arbitration agreement shall cause the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModern Neon Signs Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
Aug-25-1977
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2)
ILR1978Delhi568
filed the award in the Court. The petitioner has filed objections under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. In the objection petition, the petitioner has accepted the award in respect of the claims Nos. 1, 6 … as bal- The claim is justified for an ance payment due including the amount of amount of Rs. 1435.00 admit- the security deposit, ted by the respondent. 2. Claimant claims a sum of Rs. 15,167.00 as The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Anant Raj Agencies Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Delhi
Jul-01-1997
Arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14 and 14(2)
1997VAD(Delhi)599; 69(1997)DLT396; (1998)118PLR43
published his award on 26.3.96. 2. The petitioner filed a petition under Sections 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for filing the award and making the same a rule of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPatel Motibhai Naranbhai and Another Vs. Dinubhai Motibhai Patel and O ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-09-1996
ArbitrationLimitation
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2) and 17; Limitation Act, 1963 - Articles 119 and 137
1996IAD(SC)709; AIR1996SC997; 1996(1)ARBLR389(SC); (1997)1GLR445; JT1996(1)SC265; 1996(1)SCALE294; (1996)2SCC585; [1996]1SCR239
the Award was not filed in Court. Under the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, it was open to any of the parties to the arbitration to request the Arbitrator to file the … 5th October, 1994 are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Arbitration - time-barred - Sections 14 (2) and 17 of Arbitration Act, 1940 and Articles 119 and 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 - neither of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinshaw Manekji Petit Vs. G.B. Badkas and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-25-1968
Arbitration
Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 14(2), 17 and 46; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 299(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Defence of India Rules - Rules 9 and 13
AIR1969Bom151; (1968)70BOMLR632
1. This is an application under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, for an order directing the first Respondent, who was appointed an arbitrator under S. 19 of the Defence … to be construed as reference to the provincial Government24. The learned Advocate General submitted that the provisions of Sections 14(2), 15, 16 and 17 of the Arbitration Act are wholly inconsistent with, and therefore, excluded by, the provisions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCh. Ramalinga Reddy Vs. Superintending Engineer and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-02-1994
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections.14(1), 14(2), 30, 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 119(b)
(1999)9SCC610; [1994]Supp6SCR266
without any direction by court to do so, held, would not be effective for the said purpose - Arbitration Act, 1940, Sections. 14(1) And (2), 30 and 33 -- The award was made on 29-7-1985. Section 14(2) requires the court,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitc Ltd. Vs. Pradeep Anand and ors.
Delhi
Apr-22-1999
Arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 & 2; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14 and 28; Foreign Awards Act, 1961
1999IVAD(Delhi)240; 80(1999)DLT82
application has been moved on behalf of ITC Ltd. under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure and read with Section 41(b) of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 … read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure and read with Section 41(b) of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short 'the Arbitration Act'). By this application the petitioner seeks interim order of stay of any further … petitioner on 6.5.1998. The petitioner ITC Ltd. moved an application under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act in this Court on 22.5.1998 with a request
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.A. Mahboob Basha and K.A. Deen Mohamed Vs. K.A. Mohamed Ibrahim,
Chennai
Jun-09-2007
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30, 32 and 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 158
2008(1)ARBLR286(Madras); (2007)4MLJ1109
was prepared has since been stamped and the petitioners were asked to take appropriate steps under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940. Till today no copy of the award was sent to the petitioners by the arbitrators. 1st respondent filed … 16.4.1996 and the notice was served on the petitioners on 24.8.2000. The petitioners filed the above petition under Sections 30, 32 and 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, challenging the award dated 4.12.1994.4. The petitioners contend … the petitioners by the arbitrators. 1st respondent filed a petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, hereinafter called 'the Act', directing the arbitrators
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMilkfood Ltd. Vs. Gmc Ice Cream (P) Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-05-2004
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 2(2), 2(7), 3, 8(1), 8(2), 10, 11, 12, 17, 20, 20(1), 20(4), 30, 32, 33, 34, 37, 37(3), 37(5), 39, 39(2) and 48; Constitution of India - Article 136; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 3, 8, 17, 21, 22, 23(3), 24(1), 25, 26, 29, 31, 43, 43(1), 43(2), 47, 48, 49, 85, 85(1) and 85(2); ;Limitation Act, 1980 - Sections 34(3); Limitation Act, 1908; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules - Article 3; Arbitration (Protocol) and Convention Act, 1937; General Clauses Act - Sections 6; Interest Act, 1978
2004(5)ALLMR(SC)624; 2004(1)ARBLR613(SC); [2004]121CompCas581(SC); (2004)3CompLJ16(SC); 2004(4)CTC479; 110(2004)DLT778(SC); 2004(75)DRJ512; JT2004(4)SC393; (2004)3MLJ87(SC)
S.B. SINHA, J : Interpretation of certain provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short '1940 Act' and '1996 Act' respectively) is in question … in that view of the matter the 1940 Act shall be applicable in the instant case. Referring to Sections 21 and 85 of the 1996 Act, Mr. Salve would urge that there are well-known expressions in the … furtherance of the said direction, the appellant herein sent a notice on 14.9.1995 to the first respondent herein and its Managing Director appointing Shri H.L. … by a five-Judge Bench of the said Court in L.P.A. No.492 of 2002 holding that the said appeal was not maintainable. FACTUAL BACKGROUND : The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »