Advanced Search Results

Electrical Mfg.Co.Ltd. Vs. Power Grid Corpn. of India Ltd. and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

to both the parties. 26.6.2 The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 or any statutory modification thereof. The venue of arbitration shall be New Delhi, India. 26.7 The decision of … High Court of Delhi.” On 20.4.1993, fourth meeting of the Arbitral Tribunal was held at 10.30 a.m. as scheduled. The relevant minutes of the meeting were as under:- “It was noted that the minutes of the third … 24.08.92 Regd. Office: Hemkunt Chambers, 10th Floor, 89, Nehru Place, New Delhi-110 019 (Tel. 646 3390 91-92 Grams:‘ NATGRID’” Since there was no follow up

State of U.P. and Others. Vs. Combined Chemicals Company Private Limit ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20

decision, it served a notice upon the appellants and then filed a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short, `the Act') for appointment of an Arbitrator to decide the dispute relating to supply of 200 … Pradesh, I accept your tender/quotation referred to above for the supply of stores as per details given in Schedule `A' hereafter subject to the terms and conditions specified in the tender notice/enquiry referred to above and in … quarterly rest.(c) Staff workmen of the claimant remained idle for the period 01.10.85 to 30.9.1988 when the Unit was declared sick and financial institution agreed

Mugeem Ahmad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 2008(2)ARBLR509(Delhi); 2008(100)DRJ76

entitled for the balance payment and is awarded accordingly.9. In the objections filed under Section 30/33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, learned Additional District Judge before whom objections were filed has taken a contrary view.10. Learned Trial Judge has … rate is specified hereunder, then the contractor shall carry out the work at the rate entered in the schedule of rates of the district but if the schedule does not contain any rate for such work, then

Kei Industries Ltd. Vs. D.V.B. (Since Renamed And#8220;delhi Power Sup ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to secure the performance of the contract. Subsequent thereto, the appellant filed an application under Section 41 of Arbitration Act, 1940 before a learned Single Judge of this Court seeking injunction to restrain the respondent from encashing the bank … for establishing Letter of Credit by DESU against supplies? Ans: Yes, but in accordance with the approved dispatch schedule. …. QUE.108: Do you agree that KEI wrote number of letters to DESU for establishing Letter of Credits … was constrained to suspend further supply. That thereafter, vide letter dated November 01, 1995 the respondent illegally cancelled the contract between the parties and sought

M/s Larsen Air Conditioning And Refrigeration Company Vs. Union Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Since the Arbitration Act, 1940 has been repealed by way of Section 85 of the 1996 Act, the Schedule to the Arbitration Act, including the State amendment, also stands repealed. The only exception is provided in sub-section … Court held that it could not be said that the proceedings (in the present case) were under the Arbitration Act, 1940, and therefore, the rate of interest granted should not be 18%. The High Court referred to this court’s

Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board and anr. Vs. V.N.V. Constru ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(2), 14(2), 17, 20, 28, 30, 31, 33, 37 and 37(3); Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board Act, 1970 - Sections 17 and 56; Limitation Act, 1908; Limitation Act (Amendment), 1963 - Sections 18; O.S. Rules - Order 43 Rules 1, 2, 6 and 7

Reported in : 2008(4)ARBLR604(Madras)

in Transfer OP No. 450 of 2006 under Sections 30 and 33 read with Section 31 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and Order 43 Rules 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the O.S. Rules to set aside the said … of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners that the award was passed beyond the period prescribed under Schedule I to the Act, namely, four months from the date of entering into the reference, as rightly contended … contractor filed claim statement on 27.06.1986 seeking an award with interest from 01.06.1986. The arbitrator passed an award in favour of the contractor. The petition

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. V.M. Kuriakose and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17, 39 and 39(1)

Reported in : 2005(1)ARBLR133(Kerala)

132/88 of Sub-Court, Kollam. Arbitration O.P. 132/88 was filed by the claimant under Section 17 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 for passing judgment and decree in accordance with the arbitration award passed by the sole arbitrator on 29.09.1998 … 39 of the Act and also seeking to set aside the award dated 26.09.1998 paying Court fee under Schedule II, Article 4 of the Kerala Court Fees Act. No appeal has been preferred against the order dated

Tirumala Educational Trust, Tirumala Hil Vs. Tirumala Tirupati Devasth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

parties to the lis to refer the parties to the arbitration and if so u/s. 34 of the Act, 1940 or u/s. 8 of the Act, 1996? ii. If so, there is disentitlement in now seeking to refer … in 1999 by raising the plea of arbitration clause to refer and not referred u/s. 34 of old arbitration Act that was applicable by then as stated in the present petition rejoinder, either before filing the counter in … the O.A. to declare the respondent as the encroacher of the petition schedule property (property) within the meaning of sub-section (1) of Section 83 of … of the respondent as follows: In the corresponding lease deed No.2478/1975 dated 01-08-1975, which was executed in respect of the lease originally entered into from

M/S Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

from the respondent and hence the respondent again made another interlocutory application under Section 41 read with second schedule to the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 and prayed for status quo in the case. The appellant resisted the … bills in respect of other contracts.35) The respondent, therefore, filed an application under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act 1940 in Delhi High Court against the appellant for filing the arbitration agreement. The respondent also made an application

Al. Ramanathan Amutha and Co. Vs. the Government of India Represented ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3(A)(1), 3C, 3I, 16 and 17; National Highways Authorities Rules, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 17, 19(1), 136, 227 and 300A

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ888

Constitution Bench of this Court was considering the question whether it is obligatory for an arbitrator under the Arbitration Act, 1940 to give reasons for the award. It was argued that the requirement of giving reasons for the decision … Congress, a competent authority to adopt the standards and designs of roads as per Clause 10(1) of the Schedule to the National Highways Authorities Rules, 1957, the minimum radius at the curve point near his Fuel Station … 17.09.2004 in response to which the first respondent, vide his letter dated 01.12.2004, citing certain reasons, has stated that the petitioner's land is very much