Advanced Search Results

Apsrtc Vs. Burri Sulochana and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110-D, 168 and 173; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 473; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 76; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rules 1 and 22; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39 and 41

Reported in : 2001ACJ1222; 1999(6)ALD439; 1999(6)ALT808

Company v. James Chadwick and Brothers, : [1953]4SCR1028 , while considering Section 76 of the Trades Marks Act, 1940, where a right of appeal lies … objection given under Section 39 of the Act, it can not be read into Section 41 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.16. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants has taken objection that the cross-objections are not maintainable under … claimants are not maintainable on the ground that the Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 473 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 do not contemplate filing of cross-objections. Section 173 of the

Jai Glass and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the West Bengal State Electricit ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 20, 30, 33 and 41; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 19(4), 24, 24(2), 26(6), 36(2), 44(3), 45(3), 52 and 57; ;Electricity Supply Act, 1946 - Section 76; ;Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Section 76; ;Electricity Rules

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT343(HC)

Soumitra Sen, J. 1. This is an application under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or Setting aside of an award dated 29th/30the March, 1995. passed by the Deputy Eletrical Inspector, West Bengal. … 24(2) and 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 read with section 76 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948.3. According to the petitioner all the … the Electricity Act provides that in the absence of any provisions contrary to the said Act or any rule made thereunder an appeal shall lie of an Electrical Inspector. There is no other provision contained in the

Maheshwari Brothers Ltd. Vs. National Highways Authority of India

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 5, 9, 14(2), 36, 98 and 99; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 and 141 - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 41, Rules 4, 22, 33 - Order 47, Rule 1; ;Evidence Act; ;Trade Marks Act - Section 76; ;Saurashtra Land Reforms Act - Section 63; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34, 39 and 41; ;Quarter Sessions Act, 1849 - Section 1; ;Betting, Gaming and Lotteries Act, 1963; ;Representation of People Act - Section 116A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 136, 215, 226 and 329; ;Companies Act 1956 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 10F, 37 and 37(2); ;Indian Contract Act - Section 28

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR64(Cal),(2006)3CALLT154(HC)

Counsel for NHAI, the question was whether an award based upon an oral submission can be enforced under Arbitration Act, 1940. The Court held that Section 14(2) of the Act can only be read as referring to awards based … Sewing, preferred an appeal to the High Court of Bombay under Section 76 of the Trade Marks Act. Justice Shah of Bombay High Court allowed … held that once an appeal had reached the High Court it has to be determined according to the rules of practice and procedure of that Court and in accordance with the charter under which the Court is

The Secretary To Govt. Of Kerala . Vs. James Varghese .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

January, 1981. (2) Words and expressions used but not defined in this Act and defined in (a) the Arbitration Act, 1940 (Central Act 10 of 1940); or (b) the Arbitration and Conciliation. Act, 1996 (Central Act 26 of 1996), … taking into 13 account the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (for short “UNCITRAL”) Model Law and Rules. The 1996 Act was enacted with the clear intention of harmonizing concepts on arbitration and conciliation of different … made by civil court, for the purpose of making the award a 76 “Rule of Court”, so as to make it enforceable, cannot arise. What

Steel Authority of India Vs. Engineering Construction Services

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21, 23 30, 33 and 34

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT442(HC)

A. Lala, J. 1. This is an application under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, made by the petitioner challenging the validity of the Award passed by the learned Arbitrator, a retired Judge … such arbitration shall be final and conclusive and the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 and the rules thereunder and all Statutory modifications thereof shall govern all such Arbitration Proceedings and shall be deemed to apply … Agreement provides as follows :--'Provisions for settlement of disputes by Arbitration : 76. All questions, disputes or difference of any kind, whatsoever, arising out of

Avtar NaraIn Behal Vs. Subhash Chander Behal

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 4; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 4, 5(2), 10, 10(1) and 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 10; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39 and 39(1); Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 76; Government of India Act, 1915; Guardians and Wards Act - Sections 25, 47 and 48; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 140; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10-E, 10-F, 397, 398 and 483; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 4, 4(1), 35A, 47, 91, 92, 95, 96, 100A, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 115 and 622 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT140

against the judgment of a single Judge exercising appellate jurisdiction under Section 76 of the Trade Marks Act, 1940. Holding that such an appeal was … or by any law for the time being in force, from no other order:(a) to (f) (Omitted by Arbitration Act, 1940;)(ff) an order under Section 35A;[(ffa) an order under Section 91 or Section 92 refusing leave to institute a … any person except where such arrest or detention is in execution of a decree;(i) any order made under rules from which an appeal is expressly allowed by rules:Provided that no appeal shall lie against any order specified

Tommorrowland Limited vs Real Growth Financial Services Ltd Now Rgf Ca ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022 … procurement of shares viz 1,06,42,000 (exhibit PW1/54), the amount comes to Rs. 76.30 per defaulting share approximately. However, keeping in view the fact that the

Tommorrowland Limited vs Essar Capital Ltd. Now Known as Vajresh Consu ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022 … procurement of shares viz 1,06,42,000 (exhibit PW1/54), the amount comes to Rs. 76.30 per defaulting share approximately. However, keeping in view the fact that the

Tommorrowland Limited vs Pressman Advertising Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022 … procurement of shares viz 1,06,42,000 (exhibit PW1/54), the amount comes to Rs. 76.30 per defaulting share approximately. However, keeping in view the fact that the

Tommorrowland Limited vs Hemdev Securities India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022 … procurement of shares viz 1,06,42,000 (exhibit PW1/54), the amount comes to Rs. 76.30 per defaulting share approximately. However, keeping in view the fact that the