Advanced Search Results

Edakkavil Karimbuvalappil Abdulkhader Haji Vs. Thalakkal Kunhammad and ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 28 and 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 22, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1986Ker3

(1) Whether the dismissal by court of an original petition by the Arbitrator under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to enlarge the time for making the Award, will amount to 'superseding an arbitration' and whether an appeal … be entitled to maintain, the suit, it is competent to the Court exercising its discretion under Order 1, Rule 10 to transpose a party defendant to the place of the plaintiff, such a parly being entitled to maintain

Subramanian (Minor) and ors. Vs. M.P. Vasudevan Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1950Mad488

result, the revision petition is allowed with costs. Civil - son's liability - Sections 14 and 41 of Arbitration Act, 1940 and Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - father incurred liability which sons want

G. Madhava Rao and Another Vs. Dr. G. Padma Rao and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

would barring any further action on the original cause of action in view of Section 32 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and the absence of any steps to avoid the award under Section 33 of the Act. Ex.B.10-agreement of … award will not be binding on them. The award was not properly stamped and was not made the rule of the court in accordance with the Arbitration Act, and is, hence, illegal, invalid and inoperative. The defendants

M/S. S.M. Kannappa Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore and Others Vs. Bhup ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 155, 28, 9, 18, Regulations 26, 27; Arbitration Act, 1940; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10(2), Section 469; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Section 111; Indian Companies Act, 1918 - Section 38; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 38, 29, 30, 31, 34, 34(3); Constitution Of India - Articles 136, 18, 1, 16, 19; Companies Act, 1960 - Section 155

raised certain disputes regarding its transfer, the dispute was referred to an arbitrator under the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The arbitrator passed an award on 20.8.1990 in favour of the first respondent. Consequent upon the award, an … not arise.10. During pendency of the petition, an application seeking impleadment was filed by PK under Order I rule 10 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure r/w Section 469 of the Act. In the application, PK claims

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nippon Steel Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30, 33, 34 and 39(1); Companies Act, 1956; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 5; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 786

Reported in : AIR2007SC327; 2006(4)ARBLR171(SC); 2007(1)AWC648(SC); 2007(4)BomCR233; [2006]134CompCas712(SC); JT2006(10)SC238; 2006(12)SCALE211; (2007)2SCC382

Matched in: Citation AIR2007SC327; 2006(4)ARBLR171(SC); 2007(1)AWC648(SC); 2007(4)BomCR233; [2006]134CompCas712(SC); JT2006(10)SC238; 2006(12)SCALE211; (2007)2SCC382

Chowgule Brothers and ors. Vs. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ContractLabour and Industrial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 10(2), 30, 37(1) and 37(3); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; ICA Rules - Rules 5, 5(1), 7, 16, 16(2), 22, 24 and 87(5)

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR423; 2006(3)ARBLR457(Bom); 2006(4)BomCR78

Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge allowing the Respondent's Petition under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 setting aside the majority award made by Respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 awarded a … or effect of the contract or the breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Rules of Arbitration of the Indian Council of Arbitration and the Award made in pursuance thereof shall be binding … tender submitted by the Appellant, Respondent No.1 issued a work order dated 10.1.1983. The contract involved clearing, forwarding and handling jobs of bulk bagged fertilizers

Banarsi Dass Vs. Om Parkash and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2) and 44; Arbitration Rules - Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1957P& H301

questions that arose for decision were. '1. Whether the rules framed by the High Court under Section 44, Arbitration Act, 1940, are inconsistent with the provisions of the Act and(2) Whether Article 173, Limitation Act, 1908, provides period of … of this Court in Ganga Ram v. Radha Kishan (S) AIR 1955 Punj. 145 (B) and also on Rule 10 of the Arbitration Rules framed by this Court under Section 44 of the Arbitration Act. The facts of

Thakkar Vithalbhai Hargovind and anr. Vs. Kachhia Jagjivan Motilal (De ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1969)10GLR288

our decision in this Letters Patent Appeal, it will be necessary to refer to certain provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (Act X of 1940). The title of the Act mentions that it is an Act to consolidate and … award in accordance with the arbitration. The view taken was that an award which was not made a rule of the Court, could not validly be set up by the defendants as a bar to the plaintiffs' … The relevant discussion is to be found in para. 19 at page 1083 of the report. This is what His Lordship has observed:(19) Before the

Mrs. Pushpa P. Mulchandani and ors. (All Petitioners Through Constitut ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 34(3), 43, 82 and 85(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24(1) and 141 - Order 1, Rule 10; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9, 14, 37(1) and 41- Order 1, Rule 8 - Rules 772 to 789; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 4 to 24, 29 and 33 - Articles 119 and 137; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Article 181; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 26-A; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 58 and 58(3)

Reported in : 2001(2)ARBLR284(Bom); 2001(1)BomCR592; (2001)1BOMLR169; 2000(4)MhLj819

was placed by Mr. Bulchandani on section 85(2)(b) of the 1996 Act to urge that even though the Arbitration Act, 1940 ('1940 Act') stood repealed by the 1996 Act, all rules made under the said enactment shall, to the … of a specific exception as to the application of the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, Order I Rule 10 of the Code would squarely apply to the proceedings before the Court under the 1996 Act and, consequently,

Stick Travels (P) Ltd. Vs. Ethiopian Airlines

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2001(58)DRJ119

in this present dispute centres upon the interpretation that is to be given to Section 10 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Ethiopian Airlines had appointed Messers Stic Travels (P) Ltd. (STIC) as their General Sales Agents (GSA) but this … In Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co., : [1985]1SCR432 it was stated that ordinarily, as a rule, an arbitrator had no authority to clothe himself with power to decide the question of his own jurisdiction