Advanced Search Results

Directorate General of Supplies and Disposal Vs. Machine Tools (India) ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 85; Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 2008(3)ARBLR90(Delhi); 151(2008)DLT646; (2008)152PLR56

D 68 (revised). Clause 24 therein contains arbitration clause. Sub-clause (VI) thereof reads as under:Subject as aforesaid, the Arbitration Act, 1940 and the rules thereunder and any statutory modifications thereof for the time being in force shall be deemed … therein contains arbitration clause. Sub-clause (VI) thereof reads as under:Subject as aforesaid, the Arbitration Act, 1940 and the rules thereunder and any statutory modifications thereof for the time being in force shall be deemed to apply to … by submitting that he took this plea in the written submissions dated 01.03.2002. He contended that the same was legal plea and could be taken

Goyal Buitumins India Vs. Jaipur Development Authority

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2007(1)WLN13

arbitration proceedings, the learned Arbitrator ought to have proceeded under the Act of 1996 instead of under the Arbitration Act; 1940 (henceforth to be referred to as 'the Act of 1940', for short). However, he failed to do so. … 5,54,065/- was granted to the appellant. While the appellant moved an application for making the said award a rule of the Court, the JDA filed its objection against the said award before the District Judge, Jaipur. After

Chowgule Brothers and ors. Vs. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ContractLabour and Industrial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 10(2), 30, 37(1) and 37(3); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; ICA Rules - Rules 5, 5(1), 7, 16, 16(2), 22, 24 and 87(5)

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR423; 2006(3)ARBLR457(Bom); 2006(4)BomCR78

Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge allowing the Respondent's Petition under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 setting aside the majority award made by Respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 awarded a … or effect of the contract or the breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Rules of Arbitration of the Indian Council of Arbitration and the Award made in pursuance thereof shall be binding

Bhawarlal Bhandari Vs. M/S. Universal Heavy Mechanical Lifting Enterpr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 137; Indian Arbitration Act, 1899 - Sections 14; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 119

Reported in : AIR1999SC246; 1999(1)ARBLR355(SC); (1999)1CALLT92(SC); JT1998(8)SC393; 1998(6)SCALE417; (1999)1SCC558; [1998]Supp3SCR331; 1999(1)LC215(SC)

respondent-judgment debtor on 10.4.1989, it did not file any objections to the award Under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. It also appears that the respondent did not choose to contest the proceedings. Ultimately, the court passed an … respondent-judgment debtor but thereafter it defaulted. It is pertinent to note that before the award was made the rule of the Court, the first instalment as per the award was paid by the respondent. It appears that

State of U.P. and Others. Vs. Combined Chemicals Company Private Limit ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20

decision, it served a notice upon the appellants and then filed a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short, `the Act') for appointment of an Arbitrator to decide the dispute relating to supply of 200 … by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as `the trial Court') acted in violation of the rules of natural justice by declining the appellants' prayer for adjournment and whether the award passed by the Arbitrator … quarterly rest.(c) Staff workmen of the claimant remained idle for the period 01.10.85 to 30.9.1988 when the Unit was declared sick and financial institution agreed

M.L. Mahajan Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14

Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)42; 1997(2)ARBLR430(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT734; 1997(43)DRJ73

C.M. Nayar, J.(1) The present petition is filed under Section - 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for issuance of direction to the arbitrator, respondent No. 2 herein, to file the award Along with the … as aforesaid the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or any statutory modification or re-enactment thereof and the rules made there under and for the time being in force shall apply to the arbitration, proceeding under this

Government of India Vs. Vedanta Limited (Formerly Cairn India Ltd.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Act, the Law of Arbitration in this country was substantially contained in three enactments namely (1) The Arbitration Act, 1940, (2) The Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 and (3) The Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961. … that : “Each Contracting State shall recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them in accordance with the rules of procedure of the territory where the award is relied upon, under the conditions laid down in the … approved by the Management Committee on 25.03.1998, and by the Government on 01.04.1999. By 1999-2000, the increased rate of production at 50,000 BOPD was achieved.

Allahabad Development Authority and anr. Vs. Vidyawati Construction Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9, 20, 21, 28, 30, 33 and 34; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3 - Schedule - Article 137

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2809; (2002)1UPLBEC300

dated 23.5.1997 as rule of Court and rejecting the objection of the appellants under Section 30/33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short the 'Act').2. The Allahabad Development Authority, Allahabad, appellant, framed a project for construction of multi-storied commercial

M/s. National Building Construction Corporation Limited Vs. New Delhi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the objections filed by the contractor against the award under Sections 14, 17, 28 and 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Here it was held that sum awarded towards compensation to rectify defects was fair and reasonable and the … claim No.2 for Rs.3,16,49,892.99. As is seen from the award at page 35 to 37, the Arbitrator had ruled that only a part of the entire amount as claimed was based on actual expenditure incurred. The last … years (e) Stipulated date of start: 02.09.1994 (f) Stipulated date of completion: 01.09.1997 (g) Claimants cleared out from the site: 31st July 2003 (h) Extension

Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board and anr. Vs. V.N.V. Constru ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(2), 14(2), 17, 20, 28, 30, 31, 33, 37 and 37(3); Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board Act, 1970 - Sections 17 and 56; Limitation Act, 1908; Limitation Act (Amendment), 1963 - Sections 18; O.S. Rules - Order 43 Rules 1, 2, 6 and 7

Reported in : 2008(4)ARBLR604(Madras)

in Transfer OP No. 450 of 2006 under Sections 30 and 33 read with Section 31 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and Order 43 Rules 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the O.S. Rules to set aside the said … 2006 under Sections 30 and 33 read with Section 31 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and Order 43 Rules 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the O.S. Rules to set aside the said award dated 07.11.2000 made … contractor filed claim statement on 27.06.1986 seeking an award with interest from 01.06.1986. The arbitrator passed an award in favour of the contractor. The petition