Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: arbitration act 1940 repealed section 25 · Page 1 of about 455 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 21 2002

Wimco Ltd. and anr. Vs. Vikram Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-21-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 85(2); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 20

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC735

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been enforced from 25.1.1996 and the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, has been repealed. Therefore, the suit is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. On this plea, issue No. 5 … 142 of 1996 was filed by the respondent against the revisionists under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The revisionists contested the suit. One of the plea taken was that the suit was filed on 6.9.1996, … 142 of 1996 was filed by the respondent against the revisionists under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The revisionists contested the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2001

M/S. Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. Vs. Jindal Exports Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1(3), 46, 47, 48, 49, 50(1), 85(2) and 86(2); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14 and 17; Foreign Awards Act - Sections 2(7), 7, 8, 21, 47 and 48; Foreign Awards (Recognition & Enforcement) Act, 1961; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Constitution of India - Articles 123, 213 and 367(2)

Reported in : AIR2001SC2293; 2001(2)ARBLR1(SC); (2001)3CompLJ9(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC263; 2001(3)SCALE708; (2001)6SCC356; [2001]3SCR479; MANU/SC/0329/2001

contract for the sale and purchase contained an arbitration agreement. The arbitration proceedings commenced on 14.9.1995 under the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short the hold Act'). Award was given on 24.9.1997 by the time the Act had come into … foreign award under that Act. But before that right could be exercised the Foreign Awards Act had been repealed. It cannot, therefore, be said that any right had accrued to the party for him to claim to … erred in holding that since the arbitration proceedings were commenced prior to 25.1.1996, i.e., before the commencement of Act, the foreign Award dated 13.8.1996 could … the High Court against the respondent. The respondent filed an application under Section 151 CPC (E.A. 347 of 1998) seeking dismissal of the execution petition.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2018

Board of Control for Cricket in India Vs. Kochi Cricket Pvt Ltd and Et ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-2018

Subject : Arbitration

laid down in the original Section 34 of the 1996 Act, when contrasted with Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. According to the learned senior counsel, party autonomy must be respected, and this being the position, parties who … the 1996 Act, as expounded in Thyssen (supra), was because Section 85 repealed three enactments together, and not because it sought to refer to Court … referred to by counsel on both sides. Shri T. Satpathy (Dhenkanal) stated:“You have brought in an amendment to Section 25 (a) saying that this Act will not be retrospective. When the Bill for judges’ pension and salary could

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 08 1944

Nani Bala Saha W/O Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. Ram Gopal Saha and anr., M ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-08-1944

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : AIR1945Cal19

to be set aside on the ground of non-registration alone,' and (v) that in view of Section 19, Arbitration Act, 1940, the reference itself was liable to be superseded. 8. On these findings he not only refused to file … the Bombay High Court in Chiman Lal Girdhar v. Dahyabhai Nathubhai ('38) 25 A. I. R. 1938 Bom. 422. It is not necessary for us … she had adopted--that is to say, by applying under Schedule 2, Civil P. C, which had then been repealed--she misled the opposite parties and the Court. In these circumstances she cannot turn round and say that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1955

Saha and Co. Vs. Ishar Singh Kripal Singh and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-08-1955

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 15 to 17 and 30 to 33; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1956Cal321,60CWN471

legislative history on this branch of jurisprudence, the past decisions on the repealed Law and the decisions on the- new Arbitration Act, 1940 is of … certain Division Benches, we referred to the decision of a Full Bench the following questions:1 Does the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, distinguish between an application for setting aside an award and an application for the adjudgment of an award … of a Court' where there is no suit pending.The fourth chapter has five sections, from Section 21 to Section 25, and deals with 'Arbitration in suits'. Neither in chapter three, dealing with 'arbitration with the intervention of a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2005

Shin-etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. Vs. Aksh Optifibre Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 8, 8(1), 8(3), 44 to 52 and 85; Foreign Awards Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; High Court Ordinance - Sections 14; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 227; Foreign Awards (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : AIR2005SC3766; 2005(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2005(4)AWC3851(SC); [2005]127CompCas97(SC); 2005(4)CTC297; JT2005(7)SC426; (2005)4MLJ84(SC); (2005)7SCC234; 2005(2)LC1277(SC)

suggest in the context of Section 3 of the Foreign Awards Act, 1961 ('Foreign Awards Act') and the Arbitration Act, 1940, that the court must be fully satisfied that the arbitration agreement exists before granting stay of the proceedings. … decision unless the Court or the Court of Appeal gives leave. (Amended 25 of 1998 Section 2)(4) (Repealed 64 of 1989 Section 15)'36. Courts under … conditions required to be fulfilled for invoking Section 3 of the Foreign Awards Act, which incidentally has been repealed by the Act. What is of relevance is proposition No. 5, which the court states as follows:'(v) the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1998

M/S. Reshma Constructions Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 20, 26, 30 and 85; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 33, 34, 36 and 85; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; The Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961

Reported in : 1998(3)BomCR837; 1999(1)MhLj462

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called as 'the new Act') to the arbitration proceedings commenced under the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter called as 'the old Act') and which were pending for disposal at the time when the new … 1940 (X of 1940) and the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 (XLV of 1961) are hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal,- (a) the provisions of the said enactments shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings … an arbitrator within the prescribed time, the petitioner filed an application under section 20 of the old Act in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior … on 30-7-1996. Meanwhile, the new Act came into force with effect from 25-1-96. The arbitrator filed his award in the trial Court in terms of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2000

Punjab State Co-operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Shi ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-11-2000

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1, 8(3) and 34; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 46 and 47

Reported in : AIR2000P& H333

counsel appearing for plaintiff-respondent No. 1 submitted before me that in the present case, the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1940 Act') would apply. Reliance was placed on Shetty's Constructions Co. Pvt. Ltd. … be set-aside.7. The 1996 Act had come into force with effect from 25-1-1996 whereby the 1940 Act stood repealed. Since no proceedings under the 1940 Act were pending in this case at the time when the 1996 … decision could not be challenged except by way of an application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. Reliance has been placed on the law

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2008

Atul Singh and ors. Vs. Sunil Kumar Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-04-2008

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 7(4), 8, 8(1), 8(2) and 33; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR2008SC1016; 2008(1)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(1)AWC757(SC); 2008(56)BLJR778; 2008BusLR93(SC); 2008(2)CTC856; [2008(2)JCR39(SC)]; 2008(1)SCALE84; (2008)2SCC602; 2008(1)LC180(SC); 2008AIRSCW570; 2008(2)CivilLJ749; 2008(1)Supreme268; 2008(1)LH(SC)723; 2008(2)ICC142; 2008(2)KCCRSN83

Act, 1940. Thereafter, he filed an application on 28.2.2005 praying that as the Arbitration Act, 1940 had been repealed and the suit is of 1998, to avoid any confusion, his earlier petitions may be treated to have … aside on 3.11.2004. The defendant No. 3 thereafter moved an application on 25.11.2004 under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 praying that in view of the arbitration clause in the agreement dated 13.1.1989, the proceedings in the suit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2014

Asian Securities and Estates Lim Vs. Ms. Nausheen Riyaz and Oth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-22-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1940. Thereafter, he filed an application on 28.2. 2005 praying that as the Arbitration Act, 1940 had been repealed and the suit is of 1998, to avoid any confusion, his earlier petitions may be treated to have … part of the judgment, defendant No.3 had moved an application on 25.11. 2004 under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for staying the proceedings of the title suit and for referring the matter to arbitration. He filed a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial