Advanced Search Results

Government of Kerala Vs. Som Datt Builders Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 13, 16, 28, 30, 31, 31(3), 34, 34(2), 75 and 81

Reported in : AIR2003Ker61

side addressed their arguments with ability and assisted the Court in determining the scope and ambit of the Arbitration Act, 1996. We may at the out set point, out, before we examine the legality or otherwise of the … law relating to conciliation and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The new Act has repealed the Arbitration Act. 1940, the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 and the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 and

Capp International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sidco

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : [2003]114CompCas545(Ker); 2003(1)KLT387; [2003]46SCL68(Ker)

for filing written statement.4. Defendant later filed I.A. No. 3701 of 1990 under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act for stay of all further proceedings in the suit in view of Clause 16 of Ext. B4 agreement. … are of the view, the matter must be examined in the facts and circumstances of each case. The Arbitration Act, 1940 as well as the new Arbitration Act, 19% provides for resolution of disputes through conciliation. The Apex

Ct. A. Ct. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. Ct. A. Ct. Subramanian Chettiar an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ArbitrationFamily

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17, 21, 25, 23, 30 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 - Order 6, Rule 7 - Order 8, Rule 9 - Order 20, Rule 18 - Order 23, Rule 3 - Order 32, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 5; International Law; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1953Mad492; (1952)2MLJ524

the award filed I. A. No. 18 of i945 to set it aside under Sections 30 and 31, Arbitration Act. They complained that the agreement dated 18-7-1944 to refer to arbitration was brought about by coercion and undue … Mr. K. Bhashyam Aiyangar the learned counsel for the respondents raised a further contention that under Section 21, Arbitration Act, the power of the Court to refer matters in a suit to arbitration could be exercised only so

Tulip Hotels Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1 to 43, 62, 62(1), 62(2), 62(3), 62(4), 63 and 77; Arbitrationand Conciliation Rules; Constitution of India - Article 243O; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 54; Contract Act - Sections 55, 73 and 74; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 22C(1); Arbitration Act, 1940; Company's Act, 1956; Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act - Sections 122, 122(1), 122(2), 162 and 175

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj73

in terms of Section 62 of Indian Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as 1996 Act or Arbitration Act. This Court then left present Applicants i.e. M/s Tulip free to invoke said proceedings and all other contentions … shown as share application money in accounts of TWHL is accepted by TWHL. Provisions of Section 77 of Arbitration Act are pointed out to show that bar mentioned therein does not apply to Section 9 Arbitration Act proceedings.

Snehadeep Structures Private Limited Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Indus ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationSICA

Acts : Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Undertakings Act, 1993 - Sections 4, 6(1), 6(2), 7 and 19; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 11, 17, 31(7), 34, 34(2), 36, 37, 37(1), 37(2) and 37(3); Arbitration Act, 1940; Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 - Sections 19; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 182 and 182(2); Industrial Tribunals (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sections 19(1); Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act; Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Undertakings (Amendment) Act, 1998; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 4, 96, 109, 110 and 115; Crimin

Reported in : JT2010(1)SC70; 2010(1)SCALE108; (2010)3SCC34; 2010(2)LC688(SC)

appellant-company preferred an Arbitration Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the 'Arbitration Act') before the High Court of Bombay. The High Court appointed a former Judge of the High Court Mr. … Rs. 78,19,540.73 to the Appellant company. 5. Aggrieved, the Corporation filed an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act before the High Court of Bombay for setting aside the award which came to be numbered as Arbitration

Angle Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ashok Manchanda and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

same status and effect as if it is an arbitral award by virtue of Section 74 of the Arbitration Act, 1996. It would thus be enforceable under Section 36 of the enactment of 1996. On the other hand, … under Section 89 of the CPC. Such reference would be dealt with in accordance with Section 64 of Arbitration Act. The settlement, if any, shall be governed by Section 74 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and would

Sanyukt Nirmata Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)400; 1997(1)ARBLR583(Delhi); 66(1997)DLT776; 1997(41)DRJ527

99,783.00 till date of decree/payment were awarded. (6) The petitioner filed an application under section 14 of the Arbitration Act (for Short Act) on 23rd July, 1992; the award and the proceedings were filed in the Court, notice … and not Rs. 15.150.00 . This mistake can be corrected by this Court under Section 15 of the Arbitration Act, and is so corrected. No fault can be found with this also. (42) Claim No.31; Claimant has claimed

Ashok Leyland Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : CommercialArbitration

Acts : Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 30 and 33; Constitution of India - Article 299

Reported in : 2003(1)ARBLR83(Delhi); 101(2002)DLT65

Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. This application filed under Section 14 and 17 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 seeks to make the award dated 30th August, 1996 given by Shri R.L. Meena, Additional Secretary, Law, … the dismissal of the objections filed by the respondent UOI under Sections 30 and 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 to the said award.2. The claimant/plaintiff averred as under:- (a) The dispute involved in the present petition

M.L. Mahajan Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 1999IAD(Delhi)354; 76(1998)DLT701

There shall be no order as to costs. Arbitration - counter claims - Sections 30 and 33 of Arbitration Act, 1940 - arbitrator's award granting compensation to petitioner objected - respondent who failed to rescind contract at relevant

Delkon India Private Limited Vs. Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)644; 1997(2)ARBLR628(Delhi); [1998]93CompCas106(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT491; 1997(43)DRJ567

D.K. Jain, J. (1) This is an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeking to restrain the respondent M/s. Bharat Heavy