Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: appropriation railways act 2005 section 3 · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.082 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 2006

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-20-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 141, 150 and 153; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 153A, 164, 302, 307 and 436; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 32; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5(2), 5(5) and 11; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; The Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Parent Act - Sections 119; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 226; Statutory Investigation into Railway Accidents Rules, 1998 - Rules 2(6) and 4

Reported in : (2006)2GLR952

read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 141, 150 and 153 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Later on, the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 were also invoked and after filing … dated 17.1.2005 was given wide publicity, Special Civil Application No. 1103 of 2005 came to be filed in January 2005 for challenging the constitution of … of Gujarat made a statement on the floor of the Legislative Assembly that a Commission of Inquiry under Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the CoI Act) will be appointed to … on the stay application :-. for the time being it will be appropriate to pass an order that if a proper application is made before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2006

Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn. and anr. Vs. Jabar Singh and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N, 10, 25F, 25K, 25L, 25N, 25N(1), 25N(7), 38, 74 and 75; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules, 1976; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(12); Central Excises Act, 1944; Industrial Disputes Act, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Act, 1974 - Sections 14, 14(1), 15 and 15(2); General Clauses Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136 and 226

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR1]; (2007)IILLJ95SC; 2007(3)MhLj354; 2006(13)SCALE558; (2007)2SCC112; [2007]2SCL423(SC); 2007(2)SLJ423(SC);

in the year 1995. The writ petitions were filed in the year 2005 and the High Court mechanically decided all these cases in the light … 25N, retrenchment order as well as award are illegal and non est.9. The High Court observed that the appropriate Government by framing the Rules known as the Industrial Disputes (Uttar Pradesh) Rules, 1976 have made Section 25N … of field staff but only in accordance with the provisions of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act.4. The predecessor Corporation of the appellant made its best endeavor to accommodate the surplus daily rate workers but … AR. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Leave granted.2. A bunch of 38 appeals were filed by the State of Uttaranchal Forest Development. Corporation against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2005

L. Nagi Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 16, 16(2), 16(3), 24, 28, 28(1), 28(3), 31(3), 33, 34, 34(2), 34(3), 75 and 81; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 31; Indian Contract Act; Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2005(6)ALT325; 2005(3)ARBLR607(AP)

Matched in: Citation 2005(6)ALT325; 2005(3)ARBLR607(AP)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 03 2009

Bakshi Steels Ltd. a Registered Company Under the Companies Act Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-03-2009

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act - Sections 19, 20, 22, 23(1), 23(2) and 39(1); Indian Railways Act - Sections 148, 184 and 187; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19G, 21, 265 and 285

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj55

at bar.2. Petitioner herein is a manufacturer of metallic castings, which are, inter alia, used as inputs by Railways in the manufacturing of cement concrete railway sleepers.3. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have placed with petitioner an … Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Aurangabad and Anr. : AIR 2005 SC 760.By Respondent No. 1 :Municipal Commissioner of Dum Dum Municipality and … goods. [Section 22].[2] The goods were inspected before delivery to the transporter. [Section 20].[3] Goods have been unconditionally appropriated to the contract by the seller with the assent of the buyer. [Section 23(1)].[4] Goods are delivered by … facts as pleaded and the effect of provisions of Sale of Goods Act, petitioner has urged that Railway is the owner of 'MIC inserts' ,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2016

United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Sobha Amarsingh Ra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-19-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

to its just decision and to resolve the issue to some extent. 3. As these are the common questions of law raised in these three … challenged the Awards only on two counts. In the first place, it is submitted that, while deciding the appropriate multiplier, the Tribunal has considered age of the deceased and not the age of the claimants, which was … just and reasonable amount of compensation which the Claims Tribunal constituted under Section 165 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short called as, M.V. Act ) can award? ii. Which are the relevant parameters to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2021

Mr. Yashihirao Horinouchi Vs. The Deputy Director Of Factories

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-06-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

reserved judgment of even Russell, L.J.as if it were an Act of Parliament.” And, in Herrington v. British Railways Board [(1972) 2 WLR537[sub nom British Railway Board v. Herrington, (1972) 1 All ER749(HL)].]. Lord Morris said : … into forklift movement area and when reversing of the forklift was in 3 progress meets with an accident which resulted in an injury of his … the Apex Court in the case of SUNIL BHARTI MITTAL2 (supra) has held as follows:60. It may be appropriate at this stage to notice the observations made by MacNaghten, J.in Director of Public Prosecutions v. Kent and … WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN2CC.NO.757/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2021

In Re Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-29-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

guidelines issued by the Central Government, the orders issued by the National Executive Committee under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, policies and decisions taken by the concerned States. The States and Union 3 Territories claimed to be following … The Union of India may also issue necessary instructions to Ministry of Railways to take necessary and adequate measures to cater the need of migrant … by not later than 31.07.2021. (iii) Coverage of Rural and Urban population under National Food Security Act, 2013.39. Section 3 of the National Food Security Act, 2013 provides for Right to receive foodgrains at subsidised prices by persons … vigilance and supervision of actions of their officers and staff and take appropriate action where required. We also have no doubt that most of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2007

Prakash Pandurang Sawant Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-23-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(8), 10, 15, 18(1), 25F and 25G; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 3 and 19; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 38B; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes (Banking and Insurance Companies) Act, 1949 - Sections 4; Bombay Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules 1959; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules 1946; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR200; 2007(5)BomCR823; [2007(114)FLR675]

company. Banking companies are defined in Section 2(b) to inter alia include a corresponding new bank constituted under Section 3 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970. Parliament also enacted the Industrial Disputes (Banking … position is amplified in several judgments of the Supreme Court and at this stage, it would be perhaps appropriate to advert to two of the recent judgments on the subject. In Managing Director, Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 1956

Firm L. Hazari Mal Kuthiala Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Circle, Am ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-04-1956

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 1, 23 and 34; Stamp Act, 1899; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Constitution of India - Article 265; Patiala State Income-tax Act, 2001 - Sections 5(5) and 34; Pepsu Administration Ordinance; Kapurthala Income-tax Act - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1957P& H5; [1956]30ITR500(P& H)

of Pepsu promulgated ah Ordinance called the Patiala and East Punjab States Union Administration Ordinance No. 1 of 2005. Section 3 of the said Ordinance declares that as soon as the administration of any coveranting state has been taken … The petitioner challenges the validity of the notice issued to him and asks for the issue of an appropriate writ restraining the respondent from taking any action against him.3. The first point for consideration in the present … Special Circle, Ambala Cantonment, to issue a notice under Section 34, Income-tax Act requiring the petitioner to file a return of his total income for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2006

Sporting Pastime India Limited and K.K. Shivakumar Vs. Kasthuri and So ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-28-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 45, 100, 397, 398, 402 and 403; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(3) and 16; Foreign Exchange and Management Act

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR99(Madras); II(2007)BC263; [2007]141CompCas111(Mad); 2006(4)CTC377; (2006)4MLJ1112; [2006]70SCL158(Mad)

the Company Petition have filed C.A. Nos. 154, 155 and 160 of 2005 before the Additional Principal Bench of the Company Law Board ('CLB') under … on entering into the agreement. If, in any proceedings, the maintainability itself is being seriously questioned, it is appropriate that the Court should first consider and decide the question of maintainability, especially when it would go to … Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai, under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') alleging acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of Sporting Pastime (India) Limited ('SPIL'), … Limited ('KSL') before the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai, under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 ('the … Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai, under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Indian Companies

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial