Advanced Search Results

L. Nagi Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 16, 16(2), 16(3), 24, 28, 28(1), 28(3), 31(3), 33, 34, 34(2), 34(3), 75 and 81; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 31; Indian Contract Act; Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2005(6)ALT325; 2005(3)ARBLR607(AP)

Matched in: Citation 2005(6)ALT325; 2005(3)ARBLR607(AP)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 141, 150 and 153; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 153A, 164, 302, 307 and 436; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 32; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5(2), 5(5) and 11; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; The Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Parent Act - Sections 119; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 226; Statutory Investigation into Railway Accidents Rules, 1998 - Rules 2(6) and 4

Reported in : (2006)2GLR952

read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 141, 150 and 153 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Later on, the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 were also invoked and after filing … passed the following order on 19.12.2005 on the stay application :-. for the time being it will be appropriate to pass an order that if a proper application is made before respondent No. 6 (i.e. the Committee) … injuries. Criminal complaints came to be filed being CR Nos. 9 and 10 of 2002 at Godhra Railway Police Station on 27.2.2002 itself, for the

Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn. and anr. Vs. Jabar Singh and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N, 10, 25F, 25K, 25L, 25N, 25N(1), 25N(7), 38, 74 and 75; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules, 1976; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(12); Central Excises Act, 1944; Industrial Disputes Act, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Act, 1974 - Sections 14, 14(1), 15 and 15(2); General Clauses Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136 and 226

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR1]; (2007)IILLJ95SC; 2007(3)MhLj354; 2006(13)SCALE558; (2007)2SCC112; [2007]2SCL423(SC); 2007(2)SLJ423(SC);

in the year 1995. The writ petitions were filed in the year 2005 and the High Court mechanically decided all these cases in the light … AR. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Leave granted.2. A bunch of 38 appeals were filed by the State … 25N, retrenchment order as well as award are illegal and non est.9. The High Court observed that the appropriate Government by framing the Rules known as the Industrial Disputes (Uttar Pradesh) Rules, 1976 have made Section 25N … of field staff but only in accordance with the provisions of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act.4. The predecessor Corporation of the appellant made its best endeavor to accommodate the surplus daily rate workers but

inder Kumar Verma and anr Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Arbitration

Clause 64 of the general conditions of the contract and proceeded to hold that the General Manager Northern Railways was competent to appoint arbitrator. Accordingly, direction was issued to the General Manager to 2 appoint arbitrator/arbitrators for … failed to do so within the prescribed period and, before filing of application by the petitioner. It is appropriate to mention that in the petition AA no. 38/2005 several claims were raised and the petitioner requested that … petition under Section 11 of the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997 prays for appointment of Arbitrator by this Court for adjudicating the … M. Kumar, Chief Justice Date:19. 02.2013 : : M. M. Kumar, CJ 1.The instant petition under Section 11 of the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and

Johny J. Vilangadan Vs. General Manager, Southern Railway and Another

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

Department shall be considered of equal status to the officers in SA grade of other departments of the Railways for the purpose of appointment of arbitrators." 2. The arbitration clauses in the model agreement were modified and … applicant. 4. Thereafter, the applicant filed Arbitration Request Nos.4 to 10 of 2005 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which were disposed … no dispute. Once, the respondents have lost right to make appointment of Arbitrator, this Court would consider it appropriate to make appointment of a former Judge of this Court as Arbitrator. It is urged by the learned … to 47 of 2004 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The respondents raised a contention that the said Arbitration Requests were premature. … claims, which were received by the respondents on 11.6.2004. According to the applicant, the works were completed

State of West Bengal Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Developer of a Special Economic Zone notified under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, shall be deemed to be a licensee for the purpose of this clause, with effect from the date … inconsistent with the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989 that will not have any effect. Instead, insofar as the Corporation is concerned what was provided for … April, 2004 to 31st March, 2006.5. At this stage, it may be appropriate to take note of the contents of the tariff order dated 3rd

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Limited Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Developer of a Special Economic Zone notified under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, shall be deemed to be a licensee for the purpose of this clause, with effect from the date … inconsistent with the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989 that will not have any effect. Instead, insofar as the Corporation is concerned what was provided for … April, 2004 to 31st March, 2006.5. At this stage, it may be appropriate to take note of the contents of the tariff order dated 3rd

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Developer of a Special Economic Zone notified under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, shall be deemed to be a licensee for the purpose of this clause, with effect from the date … inconsistent with the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989 that will not have any effect. Instead, insofar as the Corporation is concerned what was provided for … April, 2004 to 31st March, 2006.5. At this stage, it may be appropriate to take note of the contents of the tariff order dated 3rd

Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap versus the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1041

[State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu, (2005) 11 SCC 600 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 1715] , does not lay down the correct legal position. … [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1041 : 2025 INSC 116 Chandrabhan Sudam … (b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the electronic record was produced by a computer; (c) dealing with any … the appellant - Impugned judgment set aside and the appellant is acquitted - Penal Code, 1860 - Evidence Act, 1872. [Paras 49, 51, 70, 72, 75, 77, 81, 90, 104, 120, 121, 123, 124] Case Law Cited … appellant. The Trial Court convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 364, 366, 376(2)(m), 376A, 392 read with Section 397 and 201

State of Jharkhand Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Developer of a Special Economic Zone notified under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, shall be deemed to be a licensee for the purpose of this clause, with effect from the date … inconsistent with the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989 that will not have any effect. Instead, insofar as the Corporation is concerned what was provided for … April, 2004 to 31st March, 2006.5. At this stage, it may be appropriate to take note of the contents of the tariff order dated 3rd