Advanced Search Results
Competition Commission Of India Vs. State Of Mizoram
Supreme Court of India
Jan-19-2022
MRTP
State of Mizoram. The Legal Position:6. In order to appreciate the contours of the complaint, it may be appropriate to deal with some of the provisions of the Competition Act. The objective of the Competition Act is … - Solution Pvt. Ltd. (R5) 3. M/s. NV International - 10,000 - (R6) 4. Teesta Distributors 10,000 - 5,00,000 These four companies/partnerships were selected as distributors to operate the lotteries as per the Regulation Rules and the … pool.3. Respondent No.4 made a complaint to the CCI on 16.05.2012 under Sections 3 & 4 read with Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act and … (for short ‘appellant/CCI’) from respondent No.4 seeking investigation under the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the 1 ‘Competition Act’) in respect of State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Management of Best and Crompton Engineering Limited Vs. A.M.Sekar ...
Chennai
Jun-06-2011
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2-A(2), 17B, 25-N, 33
of the judgment of the Hon'ble First Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.1438 of 2008, etc. batch, dated 5.11.2008, it is informed that the employee in W.P.No.11860 of 2006 (G.Sumathi I.D.No.633 of 2002), the employee in W.P.No.11539 … establishment covered under Chapter VB of the Act and in the absence of any prior permission from the appropriate Government as required under Section 25N(1)(b) and 25N(7) of the Act, the retrenchment is illegal and when the … before the Labour Court (hereinafter referred to as the employee(s)) under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity, the Act) directing the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArif Noorul Hassan Rep. by Gpa Holder, Mehdi Ali and ors. Vs. State of ...
Andhra Pradesh
May-01-2007
Property
Urban Land Ceiling Regulation Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1), 20, 26, 27 and 28; Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 6(1), 7A(5), 8(1), 8(2), 8(6), 8(7), 10(3), 13, 14, 17, 87, 87A, 158 and 166B; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 - Sections 87; Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923; Urban Land Ceiling Act - Sections 26; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act - Sections 87; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - Sections 1; Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923; Income Tax Act - Sections 139(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Rule, 1982 - Rules 13 and 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 47 and 151 - Order 1, Rule 10(2); Code of Criminal Procedure
2007(5)ALT69
into further discussion on the merits of the case it would be appropriate to peruse certain relevant provisions of the act. Section 2 (d) of … to 27 are stated to be the legal heirs of the first petitioner, who died on 30-7-2006. Respondent No. 5 is V.R.K. Sastry and respondent No. 6 is the Kaushik Society.9. Heard Sri Mahmood Ali, learned Counsel appearing … by the respective applicants under Section 8(1) of the Act. Taking into consideration the definition as contemplated under Section 2(e) and (d) of the Act, both of which have to be read together and keeping the principles as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jawaharlal Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Jun-23-2006
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 243B, 243P, 243Q, 243Q(1), 243Q(2), 243S and 243ZF; Panchayat (Extension of Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996; Jhakrhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2001; Bihar Municipal Corporation Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(11A), 4,4(4), 390A and 388(1); Companies Act, 1956; Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951; The Bihar Municipal Corporation Act, 1978; Bihar and Orissa Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1995
AIR2006Jhar135; [2006(3)JCR525(Jhr)]
Matched in: Citation AIR2006Jhar135; [2006(3)JCR525(Jhr)]
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askl.n. Medical College & Research Centre and Anr vs.union of India, ...
Delhi
Jul-29-2019
Education
Central Educational Institution shall, with the prior approval of the appropriate authority as defined in clause (c) of section 2 of the Act, 2006, increase the number of seats over and above its annual permitted strength in each … granted annual renewals and approvals by the WP(C) 6827/2019 & 6828/2019 Page 5 of 86 Medical Council of India, which has since been superceded by … of national and strategic importance as specified in the Schedule to The Central Educational Institutions [Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 and minority educational institutions referred to in Article 30(1) of the Constitution are exempted from the operation of … academic calendar as per the schedule, for process of the grant of appropriate approval to the said colleges for grant of permission for opening of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasanthilal Aggarwal and anr. Vs. P.S. Bhamdari and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-21-2006
Property
Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 4 and 8; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 82 and 92; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 34
2007(3)ALD805; 2007(2)ALT566
mentioned in Clause (e) of Section 2 of the Act.12. It is appropriate here to quote the observations of the Apex Court in State of … a case of land grabbing.14. In N. Srinivasa Rao v. Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act 2006 (4) ALT 29 (SC) : 2006 (4) SCJ 328 the Apex Court held in para 46 thus:The attempts … to curb the activity of land grabbing by the unscrupulous elements and mafia. Clauses (d) and (e) of Section 2 of the Act seek to define the expressions 'land grabber' and 'land grabbing' respectively. They read as under:2(6) … facts lie in a narrow compass. The land in an extent of 570 square yards, the subject matter of LG.C. No. 115/1995 and the land
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. United White Metals Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jul-25-2014
MRTP
Appeal No.892 of 2006 was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court by judgment and order dated 5 March 2007. 4. The petitioners claim that out of 116 retrenched employees, 65 employees owing allegiance to BKKM … four employees i.e. Respondent Nos.4 to 7, who addressed a demand letter dated 13 January 2006 to the Appropriate Authority for themselves and purportedly on behalf of some 31 others, who are under cover by the two … The challenge in the two Petitions is directed against the Order dated 22 December 2006 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Labour, Mumbai, referring under … Commissioner of Labour, Mumbai, referring under Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ("said Act"), a dispute with the following terms of the reference:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAzizunissa Begum and anr. Vs. BasheeruddIn Babu Khan and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-19-2008
PropertyCivil
Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 4, 8, 8(2) and 8(6); Court of Wards Act; Inams Abolition Act, 1955 - Sections 9; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Income Tax Act, 1963; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 55(1); Limitation Act 1963 - Sections 14; Constitution of India - Article 226
2008(4)ALD292; 2008(4)ALT614
that the petitioners have to proceed against the respondents 1 and 2 for any alleged misdeeds in an appropriate forum, if so advised, and it is for the petitioners to find out how respondents 3 to 22 … ORDERG. Bhavani Prasad, J.1. The dismissal of LGC (SR) No. 4200 of 2006 at the stage of admission by the order dated 28-2-2007 of the … possession of the respondents cannot be termed as possession without lawful entitlement, and hence, the essential ingredients of Section 2 (d) and (e) of the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, are unavailable. While noting the unusuality of giving … site by execution of various documents in their favour. As per Section 55(1)(a) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the respondents 3 to 22
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharad Bansilal Vakil Vs. Suo Motu
Gujarat
Mar-31-2006
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 5, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 17, 18, 18(1), 19, 19(1) and 20; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 170 and 202; Contempt of Courts (Gujarat High Court) Rules, 1984 - Rule 11; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 13B; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 215
(2006)2GLR1707
Matched in: Citation (2006)2GLR1707
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrigger - Bai (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) (Appellant) ...
UK Supreme Court
Mar-28-2012
Land Acquisition
UKHL 20; [2006] 2 AC 572. It was modified by statutory intervention in the form of the Compensation Act 2006, section 3. Leaving aside exposures occurring within the ten or so years prior to diagnosability, the rule can now … contrast with Bolton MBC v Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 50, [2006] 1 WLR 1492 where public liability insurance was in issue. Employers' … of the word "sustain", taken in isolation and as defined in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary from an appropriate date (1965, 3rd ed), is, with respect to injury, "undergo, experience, have to submit to", or, possibly, "to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »