Advanced Search Results

Muhammedkutty.K.P, vs the District Collector,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

DIVISION OFFICER, KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION, ERANHIPPALAM, WAYANAD ROAD, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673020. 3 THE THAHASILDHAR, KOZHIKODE TALUK, WAYANAD RD, CIVIL STATION, ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN - … the 2nd respondent, the authorized officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and … a copy of this judgment and thereupon, the 2nd respondent, the authorizedofficer shall take up Ext.P3 application and appropriate orders thereon shall be passed in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date

Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3 and 4; ;Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971; ;Unlawful Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2004; ;Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 2(1) and 15; ;Unlawful Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 141, 245, 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 254, 254(1) and 254(2)

enumerated, in paras 29 and 30, is as follows:29. In addition, Mr. Manoj Goel Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 submitted that Section 2(d), (e) and (f) and Sections 3 and 4 of the MCOCA are constitutionally invalid … of the present appeal. A further amendment was made to the UAPA, namely, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2008 and so the matter was again listed for hearing in order to ascertain the impact, if any, of … before the Constitution Bench in the earlier case, it would not be appropriate to shut out the petitioner from raising the plea by recourse to … herein.4. The appellants herein challenged before the High Court of Bombay, the constitutional validity of that part of Section 2(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 ('MCOCA' hereinafter) which refers to 'insurgency'.5. Before we proceed

M/s. Arihant Construction Vs. Subhash Kesharmal Barlota and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 and learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 finally with consent. 2. Respondent No.1 (original Plaintiff hereafter referred as "Plaintiff") has filed Regular Civil Suit No.41 … the impugned order is illegal or suffers from material irregularity? 7. Looking to the controversy, it would be appropriate to consider the Suit as has been brought. (A). Copy of the plaint is available at Exhibit A … in view of Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 ("the Act" in brief). In view of the question of jurisdiction … case of KalyanDombivli Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner vs. Prakash Mutha, reported in 2008(3) Bom.C.R. 720. In that matter the plaintiff and other persons had raised

Chandran, vs the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, ALATHUR,OFFICE OF THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, ALATHUR,PALAKKAD DISTRICT, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING 3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ALATHUR VILLAGE,ALATHUR, PALAKAKD DISTRICT, SMT.DEEPA.V, G.P THIS WRIT PETITION … the 1st respondent or the authorizedWP(C) NO. 9719 OF 2025 3officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 … the 1st respondent or the authorized officer as referred to above shall take up Ext.P4 application and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of … said land stood reclaimed even prior to the implementation of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act,2008. Therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4application in Form 5 on 29.11.2024. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is

Safia, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petitioner to the 2nd respondent or the authorizedWPC.No.8136/25 3 officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 … DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679 322. 3 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, POOKALATHUR, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676 123. 4 … not included in the Data Bank prepared for the purpose of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, the same is described as ‘Nilam’ in the revenue records. In such circumstances, for classifying the property in … months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Upon receipt of the said report, appropriate orders on Ext.P3 application shall be passed by the 2nd respondent or the authorized officer as referred above

Ameer Bency, vs the Revenue Divisional Officer, Perinthalmanna,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petitioner to the 1st respondent or the authorized officer underWPC.No.11456/25 3 Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 … not included in the Data Bank prepared for the purpose of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, the same is described as ‘Nilam’ in the revenue records. In such circumstances, for classifying the property in … months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Upon receipt of the said report, appropriate orders on Ext.P2 application shall be passed by the 1st respondent or the authorized officer as referred above … MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO.11456 OF 2025 PETITIONER: AMEER BENCY, AGED 35 YEARS,

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Sh. Vinod Kumar Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

had been passed in chambers without notice or information to the ex-management. By CONT. CAS. (CRL.) 8/2011 Page 3 that order sale proclamation had been issued for 29.5.2008. The applicant came to know of the same upon … in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like perjury, pre-varication and motivated falsehoods have to be appropriately dealt with, without which it would not be possible for any court to administer justice in the true … started to incur losses. This eventually led to the suspension of manufacturing activities from October, 1983.3. Subsequent changes in the export policy did not assist … was made to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under Section 15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, which was … “the company”), a private limited company incorporated on 24th October, 1969, (though subsequently converted into a Public

Khuran Sunnath Society and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Law, i.e., Shariat Law has been given statutory recognition by the Shariat Act. It is useful to quote Section 2 of the Act which is as W.P(C) No.31299 of 2008 -:10. :- follows: "2. Application of Personal Law … Personal Law in Muslim Succession in several cases is resulting in great injustice, it is high time that appropriate actions are taken in the matter." Pleadings of the petitioner as noted above clearly indicate that petitioners are … THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE2D DAY OF JULY201511TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 31299 OF2008(S) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------- 1. KHURAN SUNNATH SOCIETY & OTHERS ITS CENTRAL

Khuran Sunnath Society and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Law, i.e., Shariat Law has been given statutory recognition by the Shariat Act. It is useful to quote Section 2 of the Act which is as W.P(C) No.31299 of 2008 -:10. :- follows: "2. Application of Personal Law … Personal Law in Muslim Succession in several cases is resulting in great injustice, it is high time that appropriate actions are taken in the matter." Pleadings of the petitioner as noted above clearly indicate that petitioners are … THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE2D DAY OF JULY201511TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 31299 OF2008(S) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------- 1. KHURAN SUNNATH SOCIETY & OTHERS ITS CENTRAL

Khuran Sunnath Society and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Law, i.e., Shariat Law has been given statutory recognition by the Shariat Act. It is useful to quote Section 2 of the Act which is as W.P(C) No.31299 of 2008 -:10. :- follows: "2. Application of Personal Law … Personal Law in Muslim Succession in several cases is resulting in great injustice, it is high time that appropriate actions are taken in the matter." Pleadings of the petitioner as noted above clearly indicate that petitioners are … THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE2D DAY OF JULY201511TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 31299 OF2008(S) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------- 1. KHURAN SUNNATH SOCIETY & OTHERS ITS CENTRAL