Advanced Search Results

Satyam Construction Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court : Orissa

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : 106(2008)CLT652; (2008)17VST42(Orissa)

under Section 42 of the Orissa Sales'Tax Act for the tax period from April 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006 vide annexure A and the demand notice of even date (annexure 2) on the ground that the … a registered dealer under the Act having the above TIN number. Now the question is, who is the appropriate assessing officer in respect of a registered dealer having TIN number under the Act. For this purpose, it

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Minati Das and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

respondent has been taking gas cylinder continuously for the purpose of his domestic use from respondent no. 5. 3. The respondent on 06.01.2003 took gas cylinder from OP no. 1 through spot delivery by the staff of … In BalwantSingh Vs. Jagdish Singh and Ors., (Civil Appeal no. 1166 of 2006), decided by the Apex Court on 08.07.2010 it was held: œThe party … of Issues (b) and (c). The question of law raised is left open to be decided in an appropriate case. 32. In the light of the above discussion, the appeals fail and are dismissed on the ground … 2012 has been filed under section 21 (B) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 08.11.2011 passed by the Tripura State Consumer

Tvl.Aswini Foundations Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

afresh, in accordance with Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, for passing an appropriate order.3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such an … is arbitrary and illegal, as it is contrary to Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Since, the period in question is from 1.4.2006 to 31.12.2006, a Self Assessment order ought to have been

State by Thilak Park Police Vs. Sujatha and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 238 to 250

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1693

deposit of title deeds - In view of Amendment Act No.7 of 2006 to Article 6 of Schedule respondent demanded 5% stamp duty on transaction … summons or the filing of false reports that witnesses are not traceable, the Trial Court shall forthwith take appropriate action against the persons responsible for this among other things by directing appropriate action against the erring officials … 1974) CHAPTER XIX - Sections 238 to 250 - Criminal Trial by Warrant Procedure. ;Criminal case under Section 326 1PC ended in acquittal due to the non-production of the material witnesses during Trial. The State appealed against … that witnesses are not traceable, the Trial Court shall forthwith take appropriate action against the persons responsible for this among other things by directing appropriate

M/S. K. Rajendran and Co, Namakkal and Another Vs. the Assistant Commi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

afresh, in accordance with Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and pass an appropriate order. 3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such … and to further direct the respondent to complete the assessment in accordance with section 87-A of the TNVAT Act 2006 which was given effect to from 18th June 2008 by section 4 of the Amendment Act No.49/2008) 1.

Jinsasan Distributors Rep. by Its Proprietrix, Leeladevi Vs. the Comme ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : 2013WLR190

by the petitioners herein under Section 19 of the TNVAT Act, 2006. 3. Section 2(24) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 defines "input tax" as follows: … one of the petitioners in this case is a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (for brevity, "the TNVAT Act, 2006") and they are engaged in purchase and sale of tax paid goods … respect of the said goods and if the registration certificate of the selling dealer is cancelled by the appropriate registering authority, such registered dealer, who has availed by way of input tax credit, shall pay the amount

Sivadas @ Balan vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

petitioners as per Section 3 of the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights Act 2006) and issue necessary papers recording their rights. ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ … representation.(ii) If such a representation isreceived, the competent authority among the respondents will consider the same and take appropriate steps in accordance to law. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11143/2011 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A

Mandapaka Narasinga Rao @ Narasinga Rao and Another Vs. State of Andhr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

a complaint with Tekkali Police Station and that the same was registered as F.I.R in Crime No.158 of 2006. After due investigation, police filed a final report on 04.12.2006 considering that the allegations were false and that … Section 323 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Act. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to permit the committal Court to proceed with the case and decide whether to commit the case to

Shetty Chandra Shekar and ors. Vs. Neeti Ramulu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 19, Rule 2 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD709; 2008(2)ALT463

and in this context, it would be relevant, if a reference is made to the provisions of Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which defines 'evidence' to mean and include all statements which the Court … petition in I.A. No. 54 of 2007 in I.A. No. 187 of 2006 in O.S. No. 62 of 2006, filed by the respondents under Order … C.P.C., which deals with the power of the Court to order attendance of deponent for cross-examination, would be appropriate, and the same reads as follows:2. Power to order attendance of deponent for cross-examination:(1) Upon any petition evidence

Kulbhushan Parasher Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B; Navy Act; Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5 and 11(2)

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3601; 142(2007)DLT167; 2007(96)DRJ439

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The applicant is accused of having committed offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Official Secrets Act, read with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC').2. According … Official Secrets Act. Six persons, including the applicant were arrested in April, 2006; an accused, Ravi Shankaran, who allegedly conspired with them, could not be … the severity of the offences and allegations, I am of the considered view that it would not be appropriate to grant bail to the applicant. In these circumstances, the application has to fail; it is accordingly dismissed.