Advanced Search Results

Sanjoy Menon Rajan Vs. State of Sikkim and ors.

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 13B; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 406 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 3 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 and 482; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151; Constitution of India - Articles 142, 226 and 227; Hindu Marriage Rules - Rules 13 and 14

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2311

other hand, Mrs. Pema Choden, respondent No. 4, the mother of respondent No. 5, lodged an FIR on 31st March, 2005 with the Sadar Police Station at Gangtok making a false allegation that the petitioner had been … parties - and not to supplant it. It is conceived to meet situations which cannot be effectively and appropriately tackled by the existing provisions law. 14. The above makes it clear that the High Courts do not … that the FIR lodged by the respondent No. 4 and the consequent action taken up by the Police are illegal, untenable and absolutely unjustified insofar … by one Sanjoy Menon Rajan, a British citizen of Indian origin under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the First Information

Malwa Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Sunanda Sangwan and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

stood proved. It is against this order that the present revision petitions have been made by the OPs. 3. At the time of hearing before us, learned counsel for the petitioner Malwa Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. submitted that … (ii) œTata Motors Ltd. versus Ashok Kesharilal Saraf?, [FA No. 524 of 2005 decided on 12.01.2009] (iii) œTata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and Ors. … of the complaint, OR provide the vehicle in absolute defect-free condition to the complainant, duly certified by an appropriate technical authority. In fact, in the circumstances of this case, it was the duty of the dealer and … revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 01.10.2012 passed by the Haryana State

Mr. N.G. Karunakaran Vs. the Chairman, National Highways Authority of ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Mad248; (2005)2MLJ446

Matched in: Citation AIR2005Mad248; (2005)2MLJ446

Present: Mr. Harsh Bunger Advocate Vs. Sawar Deen Son of AamIn and Oth ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

be allowed to see the judgment ?. Yes 2. To be referred to the Reporters or No.?. Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Yes -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1. The 3rd … C.R.No.3762 of 2005 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA … regarding wrong entry in the jamabandi, it shall be left to the revenue authorities for consideration if an appropriate objection or petition is given invoking the relevant Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2013.09.04 11:16 I attest to the accuracy … by itself does not create any right and it merely records an act consistent with its user. I will not, therefore, take an objection relating … is no dispute that the Tribunal can decide. Section 6 of the 1995 Act in clause (1)

Jatavath Sali Vs. Mandal Parishad Development Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 2(1), 11B, 12 and 19(5); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2006(2)ALT217

Admission on 15-12-2005. The revision petitioner is questioning the order made in P.L.C. No. 285 of 2005, dated 3-9-2005 on the file of the Mandal Legal Services Committee, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. The order impugned reads as hereunder:Petitioner … in the matter, the better course would have been to give liberty to the petitioner to invoke the appropriate remedy, but closing the petition with such observation would cause prejudice to the rights of the petitioner,5. Heard … Committee aforesaid in view of Section 12(c) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, praying for referring the matter for settlement of amount under Water

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Sh. Rohtash Singh (Ex-driver)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Delhi Road Transport Act (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT374

having been sent to him repeatedly. It is urged that the respondent/workman slept over the matter and approached appropriate Government belatedly after a lapse of 14 years when the reference was made on 26.5.2004 to the Industrial … has held that the termination of service of the workman under Clause 14(10)(c) of the Delhi Road Transport Act (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as Regulations) without giving an opportunity of being … Tribunal but the respondent/workman had filed CM No. 4645/2007 on 28.3.2007 under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act for grant of the last drawn

Sudheesh Somanathan, vs Central Information Commission,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Right to Information

limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court.(ii) Declare there is no embargo as per Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005 to provide the mark list of all candidates in a public examination.(iii) To issue a Writ in nature … filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:-(i) To issue a Writ in nature of Mandamusor any other appropriate Writ, Order, or direction to the 3rd respondent to comply with the order of the 1st respondent dated … 7890 OF 2025 PETITIONER: SUDHEESH SOMANATHAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. SOMANATHAN NAIR, 343A, KALAVATH HOUSE, ERAVATHUR P.O., MALA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680734. BY ADVS. V.VISAL

Talwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 registered at Police Station A Division, Amritsar, and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of … the matrimonial home and she is having no objection if the FIR and consequential proceedings are quashed. In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even

Ang Auto Ltd. (Formerly Ang Exports Ltd.) and anr. Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the retrospective amendment should not be detrimental to any of the assessees.” 3. The said decision of the Gujarat High Court in Avani Exports (supra) … petition the petitioners have made the following prayers:(a) WP(C) 7669/2007 Declare the provisions of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005 insofar as it relates to the retrospective amendments of section 28 and 80 HHC of the Income Tax … reassessment proceedings. (g) Pass any other order(s) as this Hon‟ble Court may deem to be fit and more appropriate in order to grant interim relief to the petitioner. It would be evident from prayer (a) itself that

Bharat Enterprises and anr. Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the retrospective amendment should not be detrimental to any of the assessees.” 3. The said decision of the Gujarat High Court in Avani Exports (supra) … the petitioners have made the following prayers:- WP(C) 5240/2007 (a) Declare the provisions of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005 insofar as it relates to the retrospective amendments of section 28 and 80 HHC of the Income Tax … reassessment proceedings. (g) Pass any other order(s) as this Hon‟ble Court may deem to be fit and more appropriate in order to grant interim relief to the petitioner. It would be evident from prayer (a) itself that