Advanced Search Results

Kopargaon Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Vs. Deputy Commissi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 12 and 12(5); Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulations) Act, 1963; Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulations) Rules, 1967; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966; West Bengal Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Rules, 1968; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR159; 2007(6)MhLj233

relevant facts, may be summarised as follows:(a) Kopargaon Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee is the petitioner with whom respondent No. 3 was working as 'Accountant'. The managing committee of the petitioner is governed and regulated by the provisions of … Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. reported in AIR 2005 SCW 5785. In the matter of ANZ (supra) the Apex Court held … 1991.(c) The respondent No. 3 allegedly had tendered his resignation voluntarily on 26th August, 1982. It was accepted by the managing committee of the petitioner. … a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution should not be entertained against an order of the appropriate Government, making a reference under Section 10 of the Act, as the parties would get opportunity to lead

Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Vs. the State Information Commissioner,hri B ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005. - Section 2 (h)

of Maharashtra or from the Central Government will have to be treated as public authority as defined in Section 2 (h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 because such colleges directly or indirectly receive the grants-in-aid from … it i.e. petitioner No.2 were neither directly nor indirectly funded by the appropriate Government. Since petitioner No.2 in that case admittedly is unaided College and … receiving grants-in-aid were directed to appoint Public Information Officers in order to comply with the Right to Information Act, 2005.3. In support of the writ petition, learned Counsel for the petitioners argued that the petitioners are a Education

Cedric D'Silva Vs. Union of India (UOi) through the Under Secretary to ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(5), 10, 10(1) and 12(5); Aircraft Act; Aircraft Rules, 1937 - Rule 141 and 141B; FDTL and Roistering Rules, 2003

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR70; (2007)109BOMLR2397; [2008(116)FLR247]; (2008)ILLJ483Bom

before respondent No. 3 and stated their respective case. Respondent No. 3 thereafter submitted a failure report. The Appropriate Government considering the failure report of 28th February, 2005 was pleased to communicate its decision as under:Capt. Cedric … 2006the services of the petitioner came to be terminated. The Petitioner thereafter initiated proceedings in conciliation before Respondent No. 3. The petitioner and Respondent No. 4, appeared before respondent No. 3 and stated their respective case. Respondent No. … not being a workman in terms of Section 2(s) of the ID Act, in view of the duties assigned to him, no ID subsists.The petitioner

Malwa Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Sunanda Sangwan and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

stood proved. It is against this order that the present revision petitions have been made by the OPs. 3. At the time of hearing before us, learned counsel for the petitioner Malwa Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. submitted that … (ii) œTata Motors Ltd. versus Ashok Kesharilal Saraf?, [FA No. 524 of 2005 decided on 12.01.2009] (iii) œTata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and Ors. … of the complaint, OR provide the vehicle in absolute defect-free condition to the complainant, duly certified by an appropriate technical authority. In fact, in the circumstances of this case, it was the duty of the dealer and … revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 01.10.2012 passed by the Haryana State … two revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the

Ashok Gyanchand Vohra Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 1 to 4, 5, 5(1), 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 9(4), 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 24, 25, 29, 50 and 58(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 2(2), 3, 4, 4(2), 6, 9, 24, 25, 26, 36, 39, 154 to 176, 190, 190(1), 193, 195, 197, 197(1), 200 to 203, 204, 340 and 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 143, 147, 149, 166, 182, 191, 192, 193, 195, 196, 218 and 323; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 29, 29(1) and 50; Terrorists and Dangerous Activities Act; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1990; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 14(1), 20A(1) and 20A(2); narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Prevention of

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1270; 2006(3)MhLj163

dated 4.5.2005, directing investigation under section 156(3) of the Code passed on the private complaint lodged by respondent No. 3, is under challenge. For the selfsame reasons, which we have recorded in the aforesaid sub-paragraph (i), the impugned … or by special court it shall have the power to transfer to appropriate court viz. the Magistrate and in such eventuality cognizance shall be deemed … the MCOC Act creates a complete procedure for conduct of investigation and trial of offences created by it.20. Section 2(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, hereinafter referred to as 'Code' defines what the complaint is. According to

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005 - Article 15(5); ;Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 2(24), 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 13 and 55; ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;Civil Rights Act, 1964; ; Constitution of India (86th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Madras Provincial and Subordinate Services Rule, 1942; Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 5 and 13AA; ;Constitution of India - Articles 3(4), 12 to 35, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 51A, 51A(3), 109, 117, 136, 143(1), 162, 226, 227, 292, 323A2D, 323B3D, 325, 330, 332, 334, 337, 329A(4), 334, 335, 337, 340, 341, 341(1), 342, 358, 359, 366(24), 366(25), 368, 368(2) and 371D(5); Reciprocal Insurance A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534; [2008] 4 SCR 1

the fact that any reservation or preference shall not lead to reverse discrimination. The Constitution (Ninety- Third) Amendment Act, 2005 and the enactment of Act 5 of 2007 giving reservation to Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Scheduled Castes (SCs) … shall enable the Parliament as well as the State Legislatures to make appropriate laws for the purposes mentioned above.12. After the above Constitution (Ninety-Third Amendment) … most written constitutions. It is the starting point of all other liberties. 35. Equality has also been enshrined in various international instruments, such as the … per cent seats shall be reserved for the Other Backward Classes.14. 'Central Educational Institution' has been defined under Section 2(d) of the Act as follows:2(d) 'Central Educational Institution' means -(i) a university established or incorporated by or under

Narendra Kumar Singh vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

offences which arise from commercial, financial, mercantile, partnership or similar transactions with an essentially civil flavour may in appropriate situations fall for quashing where parties have settled the dispute. Crl.M.C.3235/2019 Page 2 of 3 16.9. In such … person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.221/2008, under Sections 67 of IT Act, 2005 and charge sheet filed under Sections 65 & 67 of IT Act and Section 201 IPC and charge

J. Kumaradasan Nair and anr. Vs. Iric Sohan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2(1), 5, 14 and 14(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 21, Rule 103

Reported in : AIR2009SC1333; 2009(4)AWC3923(SC); 2009(2)SCALE544; (2009)12SCC175; 2009(2)LC913(SC):2009AIRSCW1921:2009(2)LHSC1206:2009(2)Scale544:2009(2)JT707:2009(3)KCCRSN154.; [2009] 3 SCR 238

on or about 3.10.2005 which was marked as AS No. 301 of 2005. The said appeal was held to be not maintainable by the learned … Second Appeal deserves to be disposed of without prejudice to the rights of the appellants to move for appropriate reliefs by way of revision or otherwise, if so advised. In the result, I dispose of this appeal … cents of property with trees, building, well and a bunk (mobile hut) and all appurtenants thereto in Survey 365 described in Pandara Otti Partition Deed (marked Vol-II Plan)', situated in Chengazhassery Village, Trivandrum.The said decree was put … J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation and/or application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (for short, `the Act') is in question in this appeal. It

Pravara Medical Trust and Another Vs. The Union of India, through the ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Right to Information

that the deemed universities are “public authorities” under the provisions of Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and are bound to observe provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005. 3. It is the contention of … (c) by any other law made by State Legislature; (d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii) non-Government organisation substantially financed, directly or

M. Yella Reddy and anr. Vs. the Government of India Rep. by Its Deputy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 3A, 3A(1) to 3A(93), 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3G, 3H, 3J, 3G, 3G(5) and 3H; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 6; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 4, 11 and 18

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD696; 2008(4)ALT132

that when a request was made by the writ petitioners under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 to furnish the information, different particulars had been furnished by the self-same authority and in view of the … to which such application is made, shall transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately about such transfer: Provided that the transfer of … action of the 1st respondent in issuing the Gazette Notification under Section 3A(1) of the National Highways Act, 1956 (for the purpose of convenience, in … and the same was further extended for a further limited period on 27-12-2007.2. Counter affidavit is filed by R.3.3. The Writ Petition is filed for