Advanced Search Results
Radhabari Tea Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Mridul Kumar Bhattacharjee and ors.
Guwahati
Dec-02-2009
Company
[2010]153CompCas579(Gauhati)
in the case of Clemens (supra), has been followed in Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Newman Industries Ltd. (No. 2) [1981] 1 Ch. D 257, Estmanco (Kilner House) Ltd. v. Great London Council [1982] 1 All ER 437 … Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, … of the shares. The plaintiff-respondent received the said communication on February 9, 2008. Having remained silent for sometime, the plaintiff-respondent on February 23, 2008, issued … received any positive response from its shareholders as regards purchase of the shares, passed a resolution to institute appropriate proceedings to get set aside the impugned order dated May 14, 2009, and authorised, in this regard, the … The appellant, a private limited company, was, originally, incorporated, under the Companies Act, 1930, and is, therefore, an 'existing company' within the meaning of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhavanti Mulji Shah and Kiran Mulji Shah Vs. Municipal Commissioner ...
Mumbai
Aug-20-2009
Civil
Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 88, 89, 89(1), 89(2), 90 and 165; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 51 and 51(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 188, 394 and 412A; Constitution of India - Article 226
2009(111)BomLR3666
No. 879. It is stated that one Mulji Shah, husband of Petitioner No. 1 and father of Petitioner No. 2, became the owner of Final Plot No. 879 of TPS-IV Mahim admeasuring 1305 sq. yards out of 3640 … Writ Petition, because the direction sought for removal of contravening structure was concerning the Petitioner. It would be appropriate to reproduce the order dated 14/2/2008 disposing off the said Writ Petition. The same reads thus:1. In this … Section 89 read with Section 165 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for the sake of brevity)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPix Transmissions Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai Nagpur
Sep-21-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226, 227, 141; Industrial Disputes Act,1947 - Section 2 (k); Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Section 2 (h), 4 (1), 25, 11 (1), 27, 3 rw 5; Industrial Disputes Act, - Section 18 (3), 10, 12 (4) and (5) ; Contract Act - Section 23
Reference registered as Reference (IDA) No. 1 of 2010 were stayed, but then petitioner/employer was directed to file appropriate Written Statement before the Authority raising all defences. Accordingly, Written Statement has been filed by the petitioner/employer. In … 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order of Reference dated 21.1.2010 passed by respondent no. 2 and referring the controversy to the Industrial Tribunal, Nagpur. The said Reference as reproduced in Schedule appended to … or dispute as defined in Section 2 (k) of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947. This Court issued notice in writ petition on 28th October 2010 and … pointed out that petitioner had also filed Writ Petition No. 3972 of 2008 and that writ petition has been admitted by learned single Judge on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Venture Global Engineering Llc Vs. Tech Mahindra Ltd &Amp; Anr Etc
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-2017
Arbitration
question 1 whether the proceedings initiated by VENTURE in OP No.390 of 2008 are barred by the principle of “issue estoppel”, I am unable to … appeals today, the Registry is directed to place the papers before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate further course of action. NEW DELHI NOVEMBER1 2017 …....................J.(J.CHELAMESWAR) …....................J.(ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA … Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s.)17753-17755 OF2017(Arising out of SLP(C) No(s). 29747-29749 of 2013) VENTURE GLOBAL ENGINEERING LLC Appellant(s) VERSUS TECH MAHINDRA LTD & ANR ETC. Respondent(s) CIVIL APPEAL NO(s.) … before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate further course of action. NEW DELHI NOVEMBER1 2017 …....................J.(J.CHELAMESWAR) …....................J.(ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE) IN THE SUPREME COURT … consequences thereof:“ARTICLE VIII EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section 8.01 Events of Default For the purposes of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShaji N.T. vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Sep-21-2023
paid regularly, as evident from Exts.P3 and P4. Though after the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (for short, the Act), came into force, petitioner's property was not included in the data bank, the entries … proceeded to consider the application and has, instead, directed the petitioner to apply under the Act, to obtain appropriate orders directing the change of of user.3. Sri.Thomas John Ambooken, learned counsel for thepetitioner contended that in view … KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 30TH BHADRA, WP(C) NO. 3233 OF 2021 … the KLU cannot be treated as illegal and that the requirement of Section 27A of the Act can only be in respect of a land … Ares of land in Re-survey No.19 of Block 10 of Eloor Village, Paravur Taluk. He alleges that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskObulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Sri B.V. Sri ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-26-2010
ConstitutionEnvironment
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2; ;Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; ;Pollution (Control) Act; ;Indian Forest Act, 1927; ;Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; ;Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(1A), 4A, 4A(1), 4A(3), 5 and 21; ;Mines Act, 1952; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 3(1); ;Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(1), 27(2), 27(5) and 50; ;Metalliferrous Mines Regulations, 1961 - Regulation 111(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 73, 162 and 246
2010(2)ALT672
iron ore per annum from lease No. 1; 1 million ton of iron ore per annum from Lease No. 2, and 1.2 million tons of iron ore per annum from Lease No. 3. Further, it is having all … dispose of such applications in conformity with the orders passed by the Court. Any application which cannot be appropriately disposed of by the Committee may be referred by it to the Court....'(ii) Further, Notification No. 2 No. … statutory clearances including the clearance under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, the clearance under Environment (Protection) Act and the clearance under Pollution (Control) … petitioner ended by an adverse order viz., in WA No. 1540 of 2008 vide Judgment dated 15.12.2008. In the said proceedings, BIOP filed an application
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDoherty (Fc) (Appellant) and Others Vs. Birmingham City Council (Respo ...
House of Lords
Jul-30-2008
Land Acquisition
favour of the reasoning of the minority. First, for the reasons that were discussed in R v Kansal (No 2) [2002] 2 AC 69, it is well settled that the power to overrule a recent decision of this … however, the making of a declaration has become unnecessary. Sections 325(3) and (4) of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 leave the choice of the commencement date for the relevant provisions to the Secretary of State. But there … when on 4 March 2004 the respondent served a notice to quit. Section 2 of the Caravan Sites Act 1968 provides that such a notice … LORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD My Lords, 1. The question in this case is whether a … been breached. It was based on the respondent’s judgment as to the appropriate use of the site for travellers. The appellant maintained in his defence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt.Rachna Bajal Vs. Rent Control and Deviction Officer City Magistrat ...
Allahabad
Feb-07-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). - Section 38 of Act read with Order XIV Rule 2; The U.P. Urban Buildings ( Regulation of Letting , Rent and Eviction ) Act 1972 - Section 2(1) (f), 16 (1) (b), 2 (1) (f), 18
Manish Kumar , learned counsel for opposite party no.1 , Sri P.S. Mehra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Murtaza H. Khan learned counsel for opposite parties no. 5 and 6. 2. By means of … the Act. A case has been registered as case no. 138 of 2008 (Smt. Amar Tripathi v. State of U.P.) before opposite party no.1. 8. … gone through the record. 16. In order to decide the controversy involved in the present case, it is appropriate to have a glance to relevant provisions, under the Rent Control Act which governs the field in question, … statement that premises in question belongs to society as such provisions under Section 2(1) (f) of the U.P. Urban Buildings ( Regulation of Letting ,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradeep Ram Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Supreme Court of India
Jul-01-2019
Electricity
the present controversy is as follows:- “(5) Any Court which has released a person on bail under sub- section (1) or sub- section (2), may, if it considers it necessary so to do, direct that such person be … of power conferred under sub-section 5 of Section 6 read with Section 8 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 suo-moto directing the National Investigation Agency to take up investigation of case F.I.R. No.02/2016, in which Sections 16, … granted earlier is cancelled by way of a positive order by the appropriate court…………………………..” 13. There are few decisions of Allahabad High Court also where
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
May-19-2011
Right to Information
petitioner was found guilty of Charge Nos. 1 and 2 under Navy Act Section 60(d), Charge Nos. 8 and 9 under Navy Act Section 54(2), … of Inquiry is sine qua non, in terms of Paragraphs 4 and 7(g)(h) of the Navy Order (Special) No. 2 of 2002 read with Regulation 197(2) of the Regulations for Navy Part II (Statutory) and Regulation 202 thereof, … the issue of failure to frame the proper charges as under: (SCC p. 558, para 10) â10. Sub section (1) of Section 464 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (âthe Code, for short) expressly provides that no … rival contentions raised by the counsel on both sides, it would be appropriate to quote the charges wherein the appellant was found guilty. They are:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »