Advanced Search Results

Sharad Bansilal Vakil Vs. Suo Motu

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 5, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 17, 18, 18(1), 19, 19(1) and 20; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 170 and 202; Contempt of Courts (Gujarat High Court) Rules, 1984 - Rule 11; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 13B; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 215

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1707

Matched in: Citation (2006)2GLR1707

Mariappan Vs. A.R. Safiullah,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 23 and 53; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 12, 13(4), 43, 45(1), 48, 53, 104 and 108; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 11 and 26(1); Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Copyright Act, 1967; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2008(5)CTC97; LC2008(3)431; (2008)6MLJ1117; 2008(38)PTC341(Mad)

Matched in: Advocate Arvind P Datar Sr. Counsel for ;Sivam Sivanandaraj, Adv. in O.S.A. No. 263 of 2006, ;P.S. Raman, Sr. Counsel in O.S.A. 283 of 2006 P.S. Raman, Sr. Counsel for A.A.Mohan, Adv. in O.S.A. 263/2006 and ;Arvind P. Datar Sr. Counsel for ;Sivam Sivanandaraj, Adv. for 4th Respondent in O.S.A. No. 283/2006

Late Shri Laxmanraoji Motghare Charitable Trust and Another Vs. Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

1998 Act” for short), by taking recourse to its Section 38 and 2006 Rules framed thereunder. This Court issued notice on 11.02.2013. The respondent no.1 … the Academic Council finds that action of withdrawal or suspension or recognition is necessary, it can, by passing appropriate resolution and mentioning course of action proposed by it, recommend it to the Executive Council. Thus, the Academic … B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner no.1 a Public Trust and petitioner no.2 College run by … no.2 College under the provisions of Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1998 Act” for short), by taking

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Minati Das and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

After repeated requests by the respondent, petitioner deputed a surveyor on behalf of OP no. 1 and OP no. 2 “ Insurance Company and as per requirement the respondent submitted all relevant documents to the surveyor and investigator … In BalwantSingh Vs. Jagdish Singh and Ors., (Civil Appeal no. 1166 of 2006), decided by the Apex Court on 08.07.2010 it was held: œThe party … of Issues (b) and (c). The question of law raised is left open to be decided in an appropriate case. 32. In the light of the above discussion, the appeals fail and are dismissed on the ground … 2012 has been filed under section 21 (B) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 08.11.2011 passed by the Tripura State Consumer

Mahadeo and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Dep ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Apex Court has also clarified that as and when any dispute arises, same should be dealt with in appropriate forum in appropriate proceedings. 2013 (4)Mh.L.J. 612 (Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik Vs. Kalicharan s/o Ramdas Tripathi … B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner teachers seek salary as per the pay scale prescribed by State Government … 16 of Maharashtra Employees Of Private Schools [Regulation of Conditions of Service] Act 1977, (hereinafter referred to as "the 1977 Act" and "1981 Rules" framed … be followed even by the minority institute. Our attention is drawn to Section 16 of Maharashtra Employees Of Private Schools [Regulation of Conditions of Service]

Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Represented by Its Dean, Che ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

(29A) (b) of the Constitution of India and under Section 2(33) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Therefore, the impugned notice issued by the third respondent, relating to the assessment year 2011-2012, under the Tamil … issued by the third respondent. Thereafter, it is for the third respondent to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law. He had further submitted that till such orders are

M/S Garg Medical Hall Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2011(4)PunLR785; 2012(2)RCR(Civil)9

petitioner was keeping 9 types of narcotic drugs that had been seized at the time of inspection without appropriate purchase bills for the same. The contention by the State was that there had been no reply, though … issued on 17.10.2006; the second inspection on 10.05.2007 in respect of which, show cause notice was issued on 29.01.2008; and the third inspection had made on 02.12.2008, for which, a show cause notice was issued on 08.04.2009. … Pharmacist is before this Court, challenging the order cancelling his licence. This action follows three episodes of surprise checks made at the petitioner's shop. The … Sabo, he discharged the petitioner of the charges levied against him under Section 18-A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 read with Section 15

Dr. K.R. Mahesha S/O K.T. Raju and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Its ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Educational Institutions [Prohibition of capitation fees] Act, 1984; Post-graduate Medical and Dental Degree and Diploma Courses Rules, 2003 - Rule 11; Government Rule; Karnataka Educational Institutions [Prohibition of capitation fees] Rules, 1984;

Reported in : ILR2006KAR2752; 2006(6)KarLJ641

Matched in: Citation ILR2006KAR2752; 2006(6)KarLJ641

Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd. Vs. Tata Motors Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Tax (Appeals) on 29th April, 2004 is pending. 6. On 19th June, 2006, the Respondent issued a debit note demanding a sum of Rs. 39,61,764/- … herein succeed in availing 100% depreciation in respect of Assessment Year 2001-02 for the equipment and obtaining the appropriate refund from the income tax authorities, the Respondent shall forthwith refund to the Petitioner, the amount paid by … 1996 (in short ‘Arbitration Act, 1996’) the Petitioner (Original Respondent) seeks to challenge the award dated 9th August, 2011 made by the Learned Arbitrator by which claims made by the Respondent is allowed. Though both the parties … By this Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short ‘Arbitration Act,

Kwality Offset Printers vs Micro and Small Enterprises and Facilitatio ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

No. 2 before the Respondent No. 1 with liberty to pursue other appropriate legal proceedings including but not limited to a civil suit, summary suit … The prayer made in the instant writ petition is as under:<a. Direct that the Petitioner’s claim against Respondent No. 2 bearing Case No. DL/10/S/NDC/01213 filed before the Respondent No. 1 shall stand referred to arbitration under a sole … submits that the appropriate decision on application under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medicum Enterprises Development Act, 2006 [MSME Act] shall be taken by the concerned authority within a period of two weeks from today.3. His