Advanced Search Results
Dattaprasad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Karnataka State Chie ...
Karnataka
Jun-30-2008
Right to Information
Right to information Act, 2005 - Sections 2; Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 127A; Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1985 - Sections 2(12); Kerala Co-operative Societies Act; Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226
AIR2009Kant1; ILR2008KAR4105; 2009(1)KarLJ641; 2008(4)KCCR2357
to declare that the petitioner-Society is not a public authority under the provisions of the Right to information Act, 2005 (in short 'the Act'), and the Government Notification dated 22.9.2005 at Annexure-'B' issued by respondent No. 2-Registrar of … the Parliament;c) by any other law made by State Legislature;d) by Notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government and includes any-(i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed;(ii) non-Government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by … dated 30.10.2006 (Annexure-D) intimated the Chairman of the Society stating that under Section 2(h)(d) of the Act all Co-operative Societies are public authorities. The respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLarsen and Toubro Limited and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-12-2006
Sales Tax
Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 2(28), 2(45), 4, 4(7), 13, 13(1) and 80; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 104; Sale of Goods Act; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Indian Contracts Act, 1872 - Sections 182; Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 - Rule 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4) and 17(5); Constitution of India - Article 14, 19(1), 226, 246(3), 265, 286, 366 and 366(29A); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956
[2006]148STC616(AP)
India, 1950 declaring that Section 4(7), Explanation VI to Section 2(28) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, Rules 17(1)(a) and 17(1)(c) read with Rule 17(1)(e) made thereunder are repugnant to Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution … honourable court in the interests of justice be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 declaring that Section 4(7), Explanation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMalwa Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Sunanda Sangwan and Others
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Sep-20-2013
MRTP
petitioner is Tata Motors Ltd., which is manufacturer of the vehicle in question and has been made OP No. 2 in the complaint. This single order shall dispose of both the revision petitions and a copy of the … (ii) œTata Motors Ltd. versus Ashok Kesharilal Saraf?, [FA No. 524 of 2005 decided on 12.01.2009] (iii) œTata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and Ors. … of the complaint, OR provide the vehicle in absolute defect-free condition to the complainant, duly certified by an appropriate technical authority. In fact, in the circumstances of this case, it was the duty of the dealer and … revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 01.10.2012 passed by the Haryana State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Gyanchand Vohra Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Dec-22-2005
Criminal
Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 1 to 4, 5, 5(1), 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 9(4), 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 24, 25, 29, 50 and 58(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 2(2), 3, 4, 4(2), 6, 9, 24, 25, 26, 36, 39, 154 to 176, 190, 190(1), 193, 195, 197, 197(1), 200 to 203, 204, 340 and 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 143, 147, 149, 166, 182, 191, 192, 193, 195, 196, 218 and 323; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 29, 29(1) and 50; Terrorists and Dangerous Activities Act; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1990; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 14(1), 20A(1) and 20A(2); narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Prevention of
2006CriLJ1270; 2006(3)MhLj163
10.1.2005 rendered by the Designated Court and has prayed for quashing of the private complaint filed by respondent No. 2. The learned Judge, after going through a copy of the complaint and annexure thereto, has directed the Commissioner … triable either by court of sessions or by special court it shall have the power to transfer to appropriate court viz. the Magistrate and in such eventuality cognizance shall be deemed to have been taken as provided … has the result of virtually destroying the safeguards provided under the MCOC Act. The majority view reads several things into the Act which are not … alleging commission of offences under the MCOC Act and order investigation under section 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code when section 23 of the MCOC Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTapal Timmappa and Sons a Partnership Firm Mineral Dealers Rep. by Its ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-31-2007
Commercial
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 10, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 13, 17A, 17(4) and 30; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Forest Department under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 384, 420, 426 and 448; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 7A(1), 15(1), 21(2), 22 to 40, 54, 58, 59, 59(1), 60 and 63A
2007(6)ALD517; 2007(6)ALT259
under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. pursuant to which the Ananthapur I-Town Police Station registered the Crime in FIR No. 2 of 2007 dated 5-1-2007 for offences under Sections 384, 379, 420, 426 and 448 of IPC against the … respect of the status of the applications pursuant to the notification dated 12-7-2004 under the Right to Information Act, 2005. In the meanwhile, a press statement was made by the concerned Minister of Government of A.P. stating that … Court of the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Ananthapur against all the concerned for appropriate action in accordance with law. The complaint was referred to the police
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)
Supreme Court of India
Apr-10-2008
Constitution
Constitution of India (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005 - Article 15(5); ;Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 2(24), 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 13 and 55; ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;Civil Rights Act, 1964; ; Constitution of India (86th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Madras Provincial and Subordinate Services Rule, 1942; Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 5 and 13AA; ;Constitution of India - Articles 3(4), 12 to 35, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 51A, 51A(3), 109, 117, 136, 143(1), 162, 226, 227, 292, 323A2D, 323B3D, 325, 330, 332, 334, 337, 329A(4), 334, 335, 337, 340, 341, 341(1), 342, 358, 359, 366(24), 366(25), 368, 368(2) and 371D(5); Reciprocal Insurance A
2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534; [2008] 4 SCR 1
Article 15. The new Clause (5) shall enable the Parliament as well as the State Legislatures to make appropriate laws for the purposes mentioned above.12. After the above Constitution (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005, the Parliament passed The … efficacy and propriety of what the government has done in this regard. 2. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, who presided over the Congress Expert Committee emphasized before … the fact that any reservation or preference shall not lead to reverse discrimination. The Constitution (Ninety- Third) Amendment Act, 2005 and the enactment of Act 5 of 2007 giving reservation to Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Scheduled Castes (SCs) … in independent India have voiced disagreement with the proposition that the disadvantaged sections of the population deserve and need 'special help'. But there has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd Ibrar Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Oct-05-2017
Land Acquisition
: Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Binod Singh, S.C. (L&C) For the Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate --------- 10/05.10.2017 Heard Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and … 414/429 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4(d)/ 4([k)/5 of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act 2005. A further prayer has been made with respect to the quashing of the letter dated 04.09.2013 pursuant to … seizure or to confiscate the vehicle as the power vests upon the appropriate authority in terms of Section 10 and 2(j) of the Jharkhand Bovine
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Swapnalatha Vs. Chief Engineer, (Mechanical), I and Cad (Pw) Depart ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-18-2008
Service
Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rule 20, 20(1) and 20(2); Andhra Pradesh administrative Tribunal Practice Rules, 1995 - Rule 37
2008(2)ALD703; 2008(2)ALT65
passed by this Tribunal in OA. No. 1918 of 2005, it is open for her to file an appropriate application in accordance with the rules. MA is dismissed accordingly.8. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the said M.A., … for Services-II, appearing for the respondents.2. This Writ of Certiorari is filed seeking to quash the order, dated 23.08.2007, in M.A. No. 1185 of 2007 in OA No. 1918 of 2005, passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, … subsequent to the date of reserving the matter for order and the actual pronouncement of the order i.e., between 30.11.2005 and 17.04.2006, the mother of … may apply to the Tribunal for execution in the manner prescribed in Section 27 of the Act. The Tribunal may after notice to the authority
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDisabled Right Group Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2017
Land Acquisition
‘Disabilities Act, 1995’) which now stands repealed and is replaced by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Disabilities Act, 2016’). The first issue related to the 2 non-implementation of 3% … Rajive Raturi v. Union of India & Ors. (Civil Appeal No.243 of 2005 with Anr.), this very Bench has given detailed directions for making appropriate … State Commissioner to enquire as to whether these educational institutions have fulfilled the aforesaid obligation. Needless to mention, appropriate consequential action against those educational institutions, as provided under Section 89 of the Disabilities Act, 2016 as well
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnoop and Others Vs. Vani Shree
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-05-2014
Land Acquisition
No.209-2 dated 11.01.2013 along with Form No.1 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short 'the Act') and notice dated 16.07.2013 vide which petitioners have been summoned. Brief facts for disposal … I proceed to deal with the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties, it would be appropriate to reproduce relevant Sections of the Act, which read as under: - “Domestic relationship”., “domestic violence”. and “shared
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »