Advanced Search Results

Management of Nettur Technical Training Foundation, Bangalore Vs. S. M ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 1, 2(27) & (30), 6, 7(5), 8, 35, 57, 58, 94, 96(3) 102 and 144; Apprentices Act, 1961; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; University of Agricultural Sciences Act, 1963; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Dentists Act, 1948; Pharmacy Act, 1948; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993; Karnataka Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners' Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1961; Karnataka Homeopathic Practitioners' Act, 1961

Reported in : 2001(1)KarLJ116

training would not amount to an educational institution within the meaning of the Act. Even under the Apprentice's Act, 1961, the petitioner and the other employers are obliged to train certain persons in the training centres as well … involved in manufacturing activities. What is given here is only jobtraining. As rightly contended that even in the Apprentices Act, 1961training is given to various persons. But such an Act cannot be broughtwithin the purview of the Education … in M.A. No. 36 of 1996, dated 25-10-1996 allowing the application under Section 96(3)(c) of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, and granting stay of an

Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs.surinder Mohan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the issue which would require discussion/decision in the present case and also of the applicability of the Apprentices Act, 1961, and this detailed order dated 19.9.2016 reads as under:-"Order dated 19.9.2016 “1. This regular second appeal filed under … be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This regular second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit. The … suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff and held that the termination order dated 27.11.1969 issued by the appellant/defendant terminating the Apprenticeship Contract of the respondent/plaintiff was

N. Ravindra Murthy S/O. Sri N. Rama Murthy Vs. Shri Veerabhadra Swamy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Sections 2(13), 2(29), 3, 3(1), 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 15, 17, 23(1), 29, 29(1), 29(2), 29(3), 29(5), 29(6), 30, 35 to 38, 38(1), 39, 39(1), 39(2), 41, 57, 57(1), 57(2), 65, 69, 69(1), 69(3), 70(1), 72, 96, 153, 153(1), 155 and 155(2); Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966 - Sections 27(5); Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 2001; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 2002; Apprentices Act, 1961; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 77; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD372; 2008(3)ALT287; (2008)IIILLJ712AP

Co. AIR 1976 SC 66, another Division Bench of Supreme Court considered question whether an apprentice taken under Apprentices Act, 1961, is 'an employee' under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The agreement executed by apprentice provided that on satisfactory … and Endowments Act, 1987 (the Act, for brevity) regulates administration and governance of religious institutions in the State. Section 153 of the Act empowers GoAP to make Rules for carrying out all or any purpose of the … (Control and Appeal) Rules, 1977 (hereafter, EOs Disciplinary Rules) made under Section 27(5) of Act No. 17 of 1966 were holding the field. These are

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

disposed of by common order.2. The main question involved in these appeals is what is the scope of Apprentices Act, 1961 vis a vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, … 26. Section 16 deals with the employer's liability for compensation for injury. 27. Section 18 deals with the Apprentices are trainees and not workers which … intended to give effect to these objectives.' Now we shall examine the necessary provisions of the Act. 5. Section 2 deals with the definition. Section 2(aa) defines 'apprentice' which means a person who is undergoing apprenticeship training

Virender Singh Vs. Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd., Through the Manag ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25F; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 4(1), 4(4), 5, 7, 18, 22, 22(1), 33(2) and 33C(2); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR1159]; (2005)IILLJ856P& H; (2005)139PLR830

the said order is in violation of the Certified Standing Orders pf the respondent-Corporation, by virtue of which Apprentices Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) would apply to the trainee. The petitioner then places reliance … order dated 17.5.2001. It is his positive case that no retrenchment compensation in accordance with the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act was paid to him. The petitioner further avers that in a writ … the respondent Corporation against 139 posts which were sanctioned vide letter dated 27.1.1998. Yet another similar writ petition No. 4374 of 1998 was filed in

Rama Kant Dwivedi Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal (i) and a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(3) and 6N; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(8); Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2526; [2005(104)FLR6]; (2004)2UPLBEC1969

for decision in this writ petition is that if an apprentice has been appointed under the provisions of Apprentices Act, 1961, then he cannot be treated as workman and after the completion of the training period he is not … as a trainee and he did not come within the purview of 'workman' and, therefore, the provisions of Section 6N of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') are not applicable

Chairman-cum-managing Director, Fertilizer Corporation of India Limite ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(1), 7(4), 7(7), 13, 18 and 103; Payment of Gratuity (Central) Rules - Rules 10(2) and 17; Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) and 2(22); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1965; Payment of Wages Act; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Labour Law; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1547

under a statutory obligation. In that case, the apex court considered the term 'apprentice' under the scheme, vis-a-vis Apprentices Act 1961. The court also considered the definition of workman as contained in Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

Ballkhan Doskhan Joya Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 4(5) and 18; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25-F; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 227; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR914]; (2001)3GLR2666

ground that the contract of apprenticeship sent to the Apprenticeship Adviser in accordance with Section 4(5) of the Apprentices Act, 1961 has not been registered. The employee then approached the Labour Court under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes … was then inducted as an Apprentice Lineman on 19-2-1981 and his services were informally terminated or discontinued on 27-11-1981 on the ground that the contract of apprenticeship sent to the Apprenticeship Adviser in accordance with Section 4(5)

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Management of Hotel Highway L ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1991(2)KarLJ296; (1999)IIILLJ243Kant

prior to the amendment, the law was to exempt an apprentice but he must satisfy the definition of apprenticeship as is found in Apprentice Act, 1961. Where, therefore, the object of the Act itself was to restrict … was to exempt an apprentice but he must satisfy the definition of apprenticeship as is found in Apprentice Act, 1961. Where, therefore, the object of the Act itself was to restrict the employees only to such cases, it … and quashed the demand by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Karnataka as against 27 trainees undergoing training with the management of Hotel Highway Limited.3. In this … Management of Hotel Highway Limited, Mysore, are employees within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for

Kartik Ramachandran R. Vs. P.O., Labour Court and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 4(4), 10(1), 12(5) and 25F; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1972; Apprentices Act, 1961

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR100]; (2006)IILLJ160Del

concerned, the petitioner is covered under such definition. My attention has been drawn to the provisions of the Apprentices Act, 1961. Section 2(aa) of the Act defines an 'apprentice' to mean a person who is undergoing apprenticeship training in pursuance … petitioner submits that he satisfactorily completed his training period. However, the same was extended vide letter dated December 27, 1990 up to January 30, 1991. Even though the petitioner was representing and was working diligently, on February