Advanced Search Results

Patel PravIn Kumar Somnath and ors. Vs. Gujarat State Land Development ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 1(4), 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 13, 18, 22 and 30; ;Contract Labour Act - Sections 7, 10 and 12

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ916Guj

apprentices and therefore they were mere trainees and not workers and they were governed by the provisions of Apprentices Act, 1961 or at least the spirit underlying the Act would apply to the relations between the parties. On completion … provisions of any law with respect to labour shall not apply to or in relation to such apprentice.' Section 22 of the Act, inter alia, provides that it shall be obligatory on the part of the employer to

Sanjay Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections (1), 2, 20, 22 and 22(2)

Reported in : 54(1994)DLT403

this Court. 6. The case of the petitioners is that they are governed by the provisions of the Apprentices Act, 1961, and in accordance with S. 22(2) thereof, the respondents were bound to offer suitable employment to the petitioners … respondents to undergo 'apprenticeship training', as defined under Cls. (aa) and (aaa) of S. 2 of the Act. Section 22 of the Act provides as under : '22. Offer and acceptance of employment. - (1) It shall not

Bindhu Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 22

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR410]

the select list. According to the petitioner, since she has undergone apprenticeship training under the provisions of the Apprentices Act, 1961 (Act 52 of 1961) and also the Apprenticeship Rules, 1991, she should have been appointed to the post. … preference would be granted to such apprentices as and when such posts to be filled up. As per Section 22 of the Apprentices Act it is not obligatory on the part of the employer who had imparted training

N. Krishnamurthy Vs. Executive Director, Bhel Trichy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 21 and 22

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ1084Mad

prayer of the appellant in the writ petition and even as per that, under Sec. 22 of the Apprentices Act, 1961, the appellant cannot ask for directions regarding employment under the respondents 1 and 2. Further, in this case, … W.M.P. 17051 of 1992) referred to the direction prayed for by the appellant in the writ petition and Section 22 of the Apprentices Act as well as Clause 5 of the contract of Apprenticeship and found that it

Gujarat Electricity Board Vs. Ballkhan D. Joya

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 18 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR933]; (2000)2GLR1522; (2000)IILLJ1116Guj

and the respondent being in agreement, the respondent was appointed as an Apprentice Trainee for training under the Apprentices Act, 1961, for the purpose of undergoing training as Apprentice Lineman. In this context the letter of appointment dated February … contended that he could not have been terminated without notice, and without due compliance with the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act on the ground that he was a 'workman' within the meaning of … Y.B. Bhatt, J.1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India though styled as one under Articles 14

A. Suresh Babu Vs. Apseb, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 19, 21 and 22; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 6-B, 7, 8(3), 10 and 10(3); Regulation 1 of APSEB Service Regulations Part-II

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD590; 1998(1)ALT121

apprentice training9. Sri Surender Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner has taken me to the provisions of the Apprentices Act, 1961 particularly with reference to provisions under Sections 9, 19, 21 and 22 and the relevant rules under 6-B, … petitioner has taken me to the provisions of the Apprentices Act, 1961 particularly with reference to provisions under Sections 9, 19, 21 and 22 and the relevant rules under 6-B, 8(3) and 10(3) & (7) of the

M. Ramani and Others Vs. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the written examination. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 226 Apprentices Act 1961 Section 22, Section 22(1) Appointment Necessity of written examination Whether Petitioners who were trained Apprentices in TANGEDCO-TNEB, who were either

G. Ravi Kumar Vs. the Chairman and Dg of Ordnance Factory Board and an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 22(1) and 22(2); Tamil Nadu Medical Subordinate Service Rules - Rule 16; Tamil Nadu Medical Subordinate Service Regulations

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR80]

it was argued that If there was employment guarantee for the traind apprentices, then Section 22(2) of the Apprentices Act, 1961 will come into operation and the same reads as follows:22. Offer and acceptance of employment.- (1) It shall

M. Bhuvaneswari Vs. the Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Madras Nurses and Midwives Act, 1926 - Sections 11(2); Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 22(2); Madras Nurses and Midwives Rules - Sections 11(2); Tamil Nadu Medical Subordinate Service Rules - Rule - 16; Service Regulation; Madras Medical Code - Sections 2(3) - Rule 225; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 19(1), 21 and 309

Reported in : (2006)2MLJ787

the post for Apprenticeship training in preference to others is justified in view of Section 22(2) of the Apprentices Act, 1961. However, the said view was not affirmed by the Honourable Supreme Court in the matter of giving preference

Rajveer Singh Vs. Judge, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25H

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ143Raj; 1996WLC(Raj)UC280

This case relates to absorbing a person in employment after Apprentice Training. Referring to Section 22(2) of the Apprentices Act, 1961 it was held that on occurrence of vacancy a reciprocal binding is created under Section 22(2) of the