Advanced Search Results

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

disposed of by common order.2. The main question involved in these appeals is what is the scope of Apprentices Act, 1961 vis a vis the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Boilers Act, … deals with practical and basic training of apprentices. 20. Section 10 deals with the related instruction of apprentices.21. Section 11 deals with the obligations of employers which is relevant for our purpose which reads as under:-'11. Obligations of

M. Bhuvaneswari Vs. the Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Madras Nurses and Midwives Act, 1926 - Sections 11(2); Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 22(2); Madras Nurses and Midwives Rules - Sections 11(2); Tamil Nadu Medical Subordinate Service Rules - Rule - 16; Service Regulation; Madras Medical Code - Sections 2(3) - Rule 225; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 19(1), 21 and 309

Reported in : (2006)2MLJ787

the post for Apprenticeship training in preference to others is justified in view of Section 22(2) of the Apprentices Act, 1961. However, the said view was not affirmed by the Honourable Supreme Court in the matter of giving preference … an institution approved by the State government under Rule 37 of the Rules made under Sub-section 2 of Section 11 of the Madras Nurses and Midwives Act, 1926 with qualification prescribed for registration as Nurses and Maternity Assistants

New India Assurance Company Limited Represented by the Divisional Mana ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 11, 149, 149(2), 149(7), 163A, 165, 166, 168, 168(3) and 174; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304(A); Civil Practice Rules

Reported in : (2008)8MLJ732

the Certificate of Proficiency, dated 31.08.2000, awarded to the deceased Avudaiappan for having undergone Apprenticeship Training under the Apprentices Act, 1961 at Spic Electronic and Systems Limited, Maraimalainagar from 28.09.1998 to 27.09.1999 in the field of Electronics and Communication … on 20.11.1982 and the same was not renewed within 30 days of expiry of licence, as required under Section 11 of the Act and that there was no driving licence at the time of the accident and therefore,

Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs Moulana Hospital

Court : Kerala

connection with the work of establishment ;(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.”13. Category of employees who would be covered … whether the staff is permanent or a trainee, contractual or bonded etc. for, as per the definition of Section 2(f) 'employee' means an employee employed directly or indirectly in any establishment including the apprentice but not apprentice … 19TH MAGHA, 1945 WA NO. 469 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/10/2022 IN WP(C)NO.14016/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1

Employees Provident Fund Organization, vs Lisie Hospital,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

connection with the work of establishment ;(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.”13. Category of employees who would be covered … whether the staff is permanent or a trainee, contractual or bonded etc. for, as per the definition of Section 2(f) 'employee' means an employee employed directly or indirectly in any establishment including the apprentice but not apprentice … 19TH MAGHA, 1945 WA NO. 469 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/10/2022 IN WP(C)NO.14016/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1

Employees Provident Fund Organization vs Malabar Hospitals (P) Ltd.

Court : Kerala

connection with the work of establishment ;(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.”13. Category of employees who would be covered … whether the staff is permanent or a trainee, contractual or bonded etc. for, as per the definition of Section 2(f) 'employee' means an employee employed directly or indirectly in any establishment including the apprentice but not apprentice … 19TH MAGHA, 1945 WA NO. 469 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/10/2022 IN WP(C)NO.14016/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1

Employees Provident Fund Organization, vs Malabar Hospitals (P) Ltd.,

Court : Kerala

connection with the work of establishment ;(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.”13. Category of employees who would be covered … whether the staff is permanent or a trainee, contractual or bonded etc. for, as per the definition of Section 2(f) 'employee' means an employee employed directly or indirectly in any establishment including the apprentice but not apprentice … 19TH MAGHA, 1945 WA NO. 469 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/10/2022 IN WP(C)NO.14016/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1

M/S Indo American Hospital vs Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Kerala

connection with the work of establishment ;(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.”13. Category of employees who would be covered … whether the staff is permanent or a trainee, contractual or bonded etc. for, as per the definition of Section 2(f) 'employee' means an employee employed directly or indirectly in any establishment including the apprentice but not apprentice … 19TH MAGHA, 1945 WA NO. 469 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/10/2022 IN WP(C)NO.14016/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II, vs Holy Cross Hospital,

Court : Kerala

connection with the work of establishment ;(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.”13. Category of employees who would be covered … whether the staff is permanent or a trainee, contractual or bonded etc. for, as per the definition of Section 2(f) 'employee' means an employee employed directly or indirectly in any establishment including the apprentice but not apprentice … 19TH MAGHA, 1945 WA NO. 469 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/10/2022 IN WP(C)NO.14016/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs Sivagiri Sree Narayana Med ...

Court : Kerala

connection with the work of establishment ;(ii) engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the Apprentices Act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment.”13. Category of employees who would be covered … whether the staff is permanent or a trainee, contractual or bonded etc. for, as per the definition of Section 2(f) 'employee' means an employee employed directly or indirectly in any establishment including the apprentice but not apprentice … 19TH MAGHA, 1945 WA NO. 469 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11/10/2022 IN WP(C)NO.14016/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3: 1